Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
So let me get this straight, someone claims that evolution is not a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plans that is putting it in a bad light? Seriously?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So let me get this straight, someone claims that evolution is not a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plans that is putting it in a bad light? Seriously?By denying it at every term and claiming that an intelligent designer was necessary to create each individual branch of creatures? Correct me if I have your position wrong, but it's essentially that mutations and natural selection cannot produce the variation we see here, is it not? Really, I just picked two people at random who came to mind that I knew regularly posted against evolution. I could have mentioned MikeEnders or Justlookinla or Lifepsyop (haven't seen him around recently) just as easily. There are plenty of people here who go to bat for the creationist cause, even the young earth creationist cause; you may not have been the best example.
Evolution is intelligent design.So let me get this straight, someone claims that evolution is not a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plans that is putting it in a bad light? Seriously?
So let me get this straight, someone claims that evolution is not a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plans that is putting it in a bad light? Seriously?
Evolution is intelligent design.
Specifically: connect-the-dots.
It takes computers to keep everything straight.
And it takes software to make changes as necessary to make everything fit.
Ahhhhh, I see. Yes, we can never put the entire article up.
I'm thankful the KJB doesn't come with a copyright.
i'm only telling you what the moderation told me.The article is open access, thus there is no reason why you you should not be free to discuss it giving proper citation. In fact, you can download it for your own private use. What you did was copy and paste the entire article making it available outside of NCBI or designated sites to display it, which is forbidden and stated so on the NCBI site.
this quote is sourced from koonins book "the logic of chance"As for your comment about his quote on the origin of life research, I couldn't find any such statement.
i tried to discuss this with the moderator in question.I would suggest messaging the moderator who discussed this with you and ask for clarification, and cite my posts concerning this discussion if you like. I certainly don't know, but I think there may be a misunderstanding on what the moderator was conveying, but for sure, posting the entire article here was a really big no no. Good luck.
they told me i could not used quotes from the article, and they removed the post where i uploaded it.Christian Forums has told you can't upload it and told you to "leave Koonin out of it"?
I believe none of the evolutionary processes are mindless, unguided, or undirected without a plan or a goal.Waitaminute. Do you accept universal common ancestry, descent with modification, and natural selection.
So you did upload the entire thing? I don't however understand how this admin would tell you to leave Koonin out of it...strange.they told me i could not used quotes from the article, and they removed the post where i uploaded it.
they expressly said "to leave koonin out of it".
it isn't going to do the cadet any good though, because koonin isn't the only scientist that feels the way he does.
Yes, the source wasn't given?Also, with published pictures, graphs, etc., source citation must be given.
yes, because i was sick and tired of the cadet accusing me of "quote mining" and misrepresentation.So you did upload the entire thing?
well, he did.I don't however understand how this admin would tell you to leave Koonin out of it...strange.
yes, because i was sick and tired of the cadet accusing me of "quote mining" and misrepresentation.So you did upload the entire thing?
well, he did.I don't however understand how this admin would tell you to leave Koonin out of it...strange.
Let me give you an example. The Establishment of religion clause was designed to protect Religion from the Government. Yet the Supreme court interferes with our freedom of religion all the time. The ban prayer in school, they ban a open public display of the 10 commandment and other similar issues.
Even their is a problem with the constitution if they did follow it. This all represents man and man's law. Soon Jesus will return and for 1000 years the government shall be upon His shoulder. So God will once again be in control and it will no longer be man trying to run the show. I do not question that man wants to get it right, but only God is able to get the job done.
there were no names mentioned when the mods said my quoting of koonin was generating reports.
but by the tone of the PMs it was clear that it was YOU that was reporting the posts i made.
also, the moderation was under the impression that what i posted wasn't up to date research and what the current research revealed.
as you can see, keeping me from posting koonin, didn't help you and your cause at all.
i'm only telling you what the moderation told me.
the last i checked, "the origin at 150" is a premium article from NCBI
I see. Quote mining accusations are a common tactic. If it was the entire that would explain it being deleted. I am still unsure what to make of the other things involved.yes, because i was sick and tired of the cadet accusing me of "quote mining" and misrepresentation.
both the quote AND the upload was removed by CF staff.
well, he did.
they even said something about a "forum specific" ban, apparently banning me from this entire subforum.
why do you suppose that is?
i really can't help it if these scientists are saying painful things, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE HEARD.
Why do you think journalists misrepresent him?All I have asked is that you use primary articles written by Koonin instead of by journalists.
well, here's a shining example of the splendid double standard at work, right here at CF.
Yet no one protested for hundreds of years. Imagine that. [/QUOTE]Having a government employee compel children to partake in a religious ceremony is one of the clearest types of violations of the 1st Amendment that there is.
Now you are a part of forfilled prophecy.People have being saying that Jesus will return at any moment for 1,500 years now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?