Science Proves Creation

[HARK!]

True. Its chronic, communicable, and quite intractible.

Believe as you will; but you have no scientific proof for this assertion.

 

[Astrid]

Believe as you will; but you have no scientific proof for this assertion.

As if i am so dim as to rise to your bait

 

[AV1611VET]

Myopia is easily cured with corrective lenses.

Is that why we still have cancer?

 

[AV1611VET]

Is there a medical intervention for yec ?

When the Great Physician comes back, He is going to put an end to all of science's shortcomings.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Is that why we still have cancer?

What is this? Non-sequitur theater?

Cancer and corrective lenses have nothing to do with each other.

 

[Astrid]

What is this? Non-sequitur theater?

Cancer and corrective lenses have nothing to do with each other.

Anything is relevant to maximizing post count

 

[AV1611VET]

What is this? Non-sequitur theater?

Cancer and corrective lenses have nothing to do with each other.

Then science will stay myopic, won't it?

As long as there is a discovery to be made, science will never be omniscient.

I don't care how strong their corrective lenses are, they still can't cure cancer.

 

[AV1611VET]

Anything is relevant to maximizing post count

If you take my post count, subtract the number & game threads, subtract the number of times I've had to repeat myself, subtract the number of times I've had to explain myself, and three truths should stand out among the remaining posts:

1. GOD DID IT

2. SATAN DID IT

3. FALL DID IT

 

[Hans Blaster]

Then science will stay myopic, won't it?

As long as there is a discovery to be made, science will never be omniscient.

I don't care how strong their corrective lenses are, they still can't cure cancer.

Cancer isn't one disease. It won't have one cure. Many cancers are treatable with near perfect recovery rates.

Thyroid cancer: At stage 1 and 2, the five-year survival is 98–100%. Melanoma: At stage 1, the five-year survival is about 99%. Cervical cancer: The five-year relative survival rate for all localized stages is 92%. Hodgkin lymphoma: The five-year relative survival rate of about 92-95 % for stage 1 and 2.

There are other cancers that aren't as curable, yet, but medical science is still looking for solutions to those.

 

[AV1611VET]

There are other cancers that aren't as curable, yet, but medical science is still looking for solutions to those.

Totally missing the point, aren't you?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Totally missing the point, aren't you?

I get the point that you are repetitive, annoying, and anti-scientist. Is like your raisin debtor.

 

[AV1611VET]

Is like your raisin debtor.

My what?

You mean this?

MY RAISIN CHALLENGE

Or this?

MY RAISIN BREAD CHALLENGE

 

[Shemjaza]

Even though these photons cannot be brought to rest, and so the idea of rest mass doesn't really apply to them

An upper limit to the photon mass can be inferred through satellite measurements of planetary magnetic fields. The Charge Composition Explorer spacecraft was used to derive an upper limit of 6 × 10−16 eV with high certainty.

What is the mass of a photon?

That said, you mentioned speed. I would like to see your formula for speed in absence of time.

There are plenty of approximations, like v = x / t... but that is an approximation that doesn't hold true in all reference frames.

That's the problem absolute time doesn't exist even on a planetary scale let alone on the scale of a universe.

 

[Hans Blaster]

My what?

U didn't like my ood spellin' or pronunciatin' of the French for your special purpose here?

You mean this?

MY RAISIN CHALLENGE

Or this?

MY RAISIN BREAD CHALLENGE

Nope, but they do remind me that your challenges aren't very clever, or challenging.

 

[sjastro]

Totally missing the point, aren't you?

Since science is the root of all evil which is ultimately the point you are making then why are you sponging off its benefits such as making internet posts?

The processor in your computer or smartphone has its origins in a mathematical idea from the 1940s known as quantum electrodynamics which led to the development of the the transistor.
What makes your hypocrisy even worse is one of the inventors of the transistor who won the 1956 Nobel Prize for physics as a result was the white supremacist and eugenicist William Shockley.

How a racist genius created Silicon Valley by being an awful boss

I suggest you show some consistency in taking the moral high ground by stop posting as you are using a product invented by a racist.

 

[Astrid]

U didn't like my ood spellin' or pronunciatin' of the French for your special purpose here?

I was on the bus talking to a friend here, in
"Jack- French" ( pronounced how we thought
it looks) and ze French tourist indignantly corrected
us. Being naughty school i think our cantonese
response was probably rude.

 

[AV1611VET]

Since science is the root of all evil which is ultimately the point you are making then why are you sponging off its benefits such as making internet posts?

Thanks for the QED of Post 508:

If you take my post count, subtract the number & game threads, subtract the number of times I've had to repeat myself, subtract the number of times I've had to explain myself, and three truths should stand out among the remaining posts:

 

[sjastro]

Thanks for the QED of Post 508:

As usual my point isn't getting through.
You are just as bad as the science you continuously criticize by sponging off the technological benefits gained through science.

 

[AV1611VET]

As usual my point isn't getting through.
You are just as bad as the science you continuously criticize by sponging off the technological benefits gained through science.

It just appears that way, since I hold science to a Higher Standard than you do.

Used as God intended it, science is wonderful and a blessing.

Any other use -- such as for the love of money, or to get your name in lights, or to compare one nation's level of technology to another's, or whatever -- is not of God.

 

[Hans Blaster]

It just appears that way, since I hold science to a Higher Standard than you do.

You repeatedly demonstrate you have no real grasp of how and why science is done. Your standards are irrelevant.

Used as God intended it, science is wonderful and a blessing.

If the Bible is the "word of God" then there are no messages from god on how to use science or any mention of it.

Any other use -- such as for the love of money, or to get your name in lights, or to compare one nation's level of technology to another's, or whatever -- is not of God.

Science is no place to go for those who love money. Little fame is available and those who acquire some only get belittled by people like you.