Astrophile
Newbie
- Aug 30, 2013
- 2,338
- 1,559
- 77
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Widowed
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
For example?Over the years I have experienced numerous instances that defy the supposedly known laws of Physics, and even logic.
It's a mathematical shape created by knocking over stalks of grain. It's not inexplicable physics.
I think scientists have found more to them than just mathematical shapes and stalks of grain knocked to the ground ... don't you?
Some of the shapes aren't mathematical, so what.
A small number of scientists (physicist Eltjo Haselhoff, the late biophysicist William Levengood) have found differences between the crops inside the circles and outside them, citing this as evidence they were not man-made.
I am aware of the "circle nutters" and their "blown joint" claims, etc.
Did ... did you just call an MSc, PhD, FGP a 'circle nutter'?
What do you think?
The primordial atom is an antiquated and out dated concept.I think the majority of academia live in a teensy-weensy primeval atom called "the physical universe."
Sounds like a plan. Measure it or else.If they can't see it, feel it, touch it, smell it, hear it, or quantify it, it doesn't exist.
Crop circles don't require exotic physics, just a plan, some ropes, and a device to stomp down stalks. It's still impressive design and subterfuge, but it's not exotic.And anyone who says otherwise -- even their own -- become targets of name-calling and ridicule.
Yes.
Your post demonstrates that you're willing to ridicule your own people to save face; and keep Astrophile's legitimate question from being properly answered.
I looked him up after reading this post as I'd never heard of him. I have no problem underbussing him. None what so ever. I assume he's a better guitar player than I (FGP is apparently for "fine guitar player"), but he's lost the plot on physics if he's chasing "weird physics" in crop circles.But, hey.
If you're willing to thrown Eltjo Haselhoff under the bus to keep me from legitimately answering a good question, then so be it.
I looked him up after reading this post as I'd never heard of him. I have no problem underbussing him. None what so ever. I assume he's a better guitar player than I (FGP is apparently for "fine guitar player"), but he's lost the plot on physics if he's chasing "weird physics" in crop circles.
His "researchgate" profile reads:-- I know you better than this, Hans.
Show me your research skills and get the right person.
I didn't intend to have a Theological discussion. That is why I posted this thread in the Science forum.I asked you a question, or rather two questions.
The first is, are you inferring that the origin of the universe in the 'Big Bang' 13.8 billion years ago requires its creation by a sentient being of unknown nature, and nothing more than that?
The second is, are you saying that science proves that the creation story in Genesis 1 is true?
Creation requires a creator, so you are stllI didn't intend to have a Theological discussion. That is why I posted this thread in the Science forum.
What do you infer created the universe?
-- I know you better than this, Hans.
Show me your research skills and get the right person.
Author Benjamin Myers on the crop circle makers who 'blew people's minds'
A new novel follows the men who owned up to making crop circles - but some of the mystery remains.www.bbc.com Crop Circles Were Made by Supernatural Forces. Named Doug and Dave. (Published 2022)
Intricate patterns carved in fields across England in the 1980s were a viral phenomenon long before the internet fed us such prankster curiosities daily.www.nytimes.com Crop Circles: The Art of the Hoax
They may not be evidence of UFOs, ancient spirits or secret weapons, but there is something magical in their allurewww.smithsonianmag.com
Impressive credentials, don't you think?
Would you add "circle nutter" to them, as Hans did?
" thread hijack" is also a termSeems like those links show what I was saying...
(In case you can't tell, "circle nutters" was the term I used for the people who "investigate" circles for weird physics and paranormal activity and didn't find "Doug and Dave".)
" thread hijack" is also a term
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?