Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
of course some people go deeper into sin than others, but all of us are evil and only made righteous by faith in Jesus Christ. fearful and unbelieveing is not the correct term. all in the lake of fire will be unbelievers, some excessively evil peoplewill be fearful, and some less evil people will have no fear. the determining factor is degree of wickedness. the more wicked the hoter the flames.Kimberlyann said:2ducklow,
You didn't answer the above question.
Matthew 10:15 Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.EchoPneuma said:None of that is in the bible.....
2ducklow said:Matthew 10:15 Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
it says day of judgement, lake of fire occurs at the day of judgement. as a preacher you should know that.EchoPneuma said:That says NOTHING about the Lake of Fire. You read into scripture what you want it to say.
and the bible ALSO says that even Sodom and Gomorrah will have their fortunes restored. Why do you continue to ignore that?
and your point is?Benoni said:Fire was first used in a sacrifice of Abel = where the sweat of the works of Cains was not significant or acceptable.
Sacrifices were always done using fire which is symbolic of our flesh must be burnt or purified in the presence of God.
The sweat of Cain was not sufficient and was not an acceptable offering unto God for sin. All flesh (self) must be burnt by the fire of God.
Sweat or works is not acceptable. The Priest in the Aaronic order could not wear wool; wool causes sweat.
I love the type of Moses who went up the mountain; when Moses came down; the glory of God made His face glow to where the children of Israel could not even look at His face.
Psalm 103:7
He made known his ways unto Moses, his acts unto the children of Israel.
Most of Gods people knows Gods acts; Moses knew God face to face and knew Gods ways. Jesus said I am the way; (not religion) I want to know God face to face; that is the only way you will know his ways.
2ducklow said:it says day of judgement, lake of fire occurs at the day of judgement. as a preacher you should know that.
already answered the restoration of sodom and gomorrah. quote the scripture and Ill comment again for your viewing pleasure.
sodom and gomorrha are judged at judgement day. evil wicked people, satan and demons and the false prophet and all those who take the mark of the beast are cast into the lake of fire on judgement day. the judgement of sodom will be less than the judgement of capernium. no addition to the word here.EchoPneuma said:So what? It still doesn't say anything in the verse about anyone going to the LOF. You are adding your own ideas to the text.
what question?EP said:Why don't you just answer the other question I asked earlier that you refused to answer.
because god is not love. love is not god, love is an attribute of God. love is a predicate nominative which means it acts like an adjective. as in the case of "the car is red." the car is not the color red. or" the house is blue," the house is not the color blue. or "love is kind" love is not equivalent to kind, love is more than kindness. kindness is an attribute of love. so the answer is that love is not equal to God but is rather an attribute of God . therefore love does notharm people by throwing them in the lake of fire, unless they are thown in by jealousy because they rejected god who loved them for the devil .EP said:If GOd IS love and love does no harm to anyone, then how can you say that God will harm millions of people for all of eternity in the LOF?
2ducklow said:sodom and gomorrha are judged at judgement day. evil wicked people, satan and demons and the false prophet and all those who take the mark of the beast are cast into the lake of fire on judgement day. the judgement of sodom will be less than the judgement of capernium. no addition to the word here.
because god is not love. love is not god,
love is an attribute of God. love is a predicate nominative which means it acts like an adjective. as in the case of "the car is red." the car is not the color red. or" the house is blue," the house is not the color blue. or "love is kind" love is not equivalent to kind, love is more than kindness. kindness is an attribute of love. so the answer is that love is not equal to God but is rather an attribute of God . therefore love does notharm people by throwing them in the lake of fire, unless they are thown in by jealousy because they rejected god who loved them for the devil .
What scripture?EchoPneuma said:And what about the scripture that says that Sodom and Gomorrah's fortunes will be RESTORED. How can they be restored if they are in the LOF for all eternity? They can't. So you are wrong.
there is no definite article before love which when 2 nouns are joined by the verb 'to be' or 'to become" and one noun doesn't have the definite article , that noun is a predicate nominative. a predicate nominative predicates something aboutthe subject which in this case is god. the car is red doesn't mean the car is the color red and god is love doesn't mean god is the emotion love. the verse immediately preceding 1 john 4.8 is verse 7EP said:1 John 4:8
Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.
Seems your doctrine is at odds with the bible. It says God IS love. His very essence is love. He doesn't HAVE it.....He IS it.
and love DOES NO HARM.
well thescripture above is in the bible and it backs up what I say.EP said:Blah blah blah.....all your own ideas and opinions...nothing backed up by the bible.
Nope I have just shown that God does not equal love but rather that love is a deep and defining emotion of God. If I love you it doesn't mean I god you.EP said:THe bible says GOD IS LOVE....and that LOVE DOES NO HARM. You have just shown that you don't care what it says that you are going to concoct your own doctrines and definitions to line up with your beliefs.
Echo said:And what about the scripture that says that Sodom and Gomorrah's fortunes will be RESTORED. How can they be restored if they are in the LOF for all eternity? They can't. So you are wrong.![]()
duck said:What scripture?
Ok, now I remember, sodom and gomorrha are the descendants of lot who was from sodom and gomorrha. that would be amonnites and moabites.KA said:53 "When I bring back their captives, the captives of Sodom and her daughters, and the captives of Samaria and her daughters, then I will also bring back the captives of your captivity among them, 54 that you may bear your own shame and be disgraced by all that you did when you comforted them. 55 When your sisters, Sodom and her daughters, return to their former state, and Samaria and her daughters return to their former state, then you and your daughters will return to your former state.
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom23.v.liii.html. He here confirms again what we lately saw, that the Jews were doomed and devoted to final destruction, nor was it possible for them to escape any more than for Sodom to rise again and Samaria to be restored to her original dignity. The Jews foolishly corrupt this passage, since they think that restoration is promised to Israel and Sodom. But by Sodomites they mean the Moabites and Ammonites, the descendants of Lot who dwell at Sodom: but a child may see that this is trifling. There is no doubt that the Prophet here deprives the Jews of all hope of safety by reasoning upon an impossibility: as if he had said, you shall be safe when Sodom and Samaria are. We now understand the Prophet’s meaning. But the inquiry arises — how can he pronounce none of the Israelites safe, when their return home is so often promised? But we must bear in mind, what we saw elsewhere, and what it is often necessary to repeat, since many passages in the prophets would otherwise give rise to scruples. Therefore we have sometimes said, that the prophets speak of the people in two ways; for they sometimes regard the whole body of the nation promiscuously: but the Israelites were already alienated from God; afterwards the Jews also cut themselves off from him. Since therefore each people, considering them in a body and in the mass, to speak roughly, was outcast, it is not surprising if the prophets use this language — that no hope of mercy remained — since they had excluded themselves from God’s mercy. But afterwards they change their discourse to the remnant: for God always preserves a hidden seed, that the Church should not be utterly extinguished: for there must always be a Church in the world, but sometimes it is preserved miserably as it were in a sepulcher, since it is nowhere apparent. God, therefore, when he denounces final vengeance on the Jews, regards the body of the people, but then he promises that there shall be a small seed which he wishes to remain safe. Hence it is said in Isaiah, (Isaiah 8:16,) seal my law, bind up my testimony among my disciples; that is, address my disciples as if you were reading in a hidden corner any writing which you did not wish to be made public. Do you therefore collect my disciples together, that you may deliver to them my law and my testimony like a sealed letter. But now God cites to his tribunal those degenerate Jews who had nothing in common with Abraham, since they had made void and utterly abolished his covenant: Now, therefore, we see how the Jews perished together with Sodom and Samaria, and were never restored, that is, as far as relates to that. filth and dregs which were utterly unworthy of the honor of which they boasted. I will restore, therefore, their captivities; namely, the captivity of Sodom and of its cities, and the captivity of Samaria and its cities, and the captivity of thy captivities, that is, and the captivity of all thy land; I will restore you, says he, altogether; but he speaks ironically, and, as I have said, he shows that God’s taking pity upon the Jews was impossible.
Yes these verses are about believers. Who were saved by or through fire.
StudentoftheWord said:Hello everyone, I apologize to a few of my "CF Buddies" for my absense.
I see we have a good conversation going on. This is going to be surprising to some perhaps, but not everyone is going to be saved as one through fire. In fact, the fire is reserved for the more difficult cases. This is hard for some in the CU/UR understanding to see but there is very clear understanding I have concerning this hot (forgive the pun) issue.
The first is to seperate ourselves for the sake of discussion the many types of fires found in Scripture. It is very easy to say they are all the same (which I have seen Benoni say here in the past) but the reality is they are fire. Real life examples would be, a candle light fire is used for light, a stove fire is used for cooking, a torch weilder flame is for fusing metal, the rocket fire is for propelling a rocket into space, refiner's fire is used to purify metals, a garbage fire is to burn up refuge, etc. Yes they all contain fire, but their usage dictates what they are used for. So if I say my candle is a fire, is it the same fire that launches a rocket into space?
I propose that there are those who who are not saved by fire at all. Interestingly enough.![]()