Wow, really? it can't be more clear.You don't appear to have a point at all here - chaos can apply to whatever context you want... the contents of a box or the whole world.
Your logic is "illusive" when you insist that chaos-disorder applied as a description for the world can not ever be a description for anything else.
Please be serious or you will be seen as simply posting fluff.
why don't you try to Debunk what I said.
"What dont you understand about the fact that if you use the word Abyss in Rev 20 as meaning the word is in a state as in genesis 1, then you have to apply this same logic to Revelation 9:1-2, Lets see... is the earth with our form and void as in when the locusts come out of the Abyss?? How about the King that the locusts have over them, the Angel of the Abyss in verse 11???? What about the beast that ascends out of the Abyss in Rev 17:8. That goes for the rest of the times Abyssos is used in the new testament. You are doing a typical adventist stunt, you use the word only when it fits your doctrine. On top of that you are using the septuigint manuscript that adventist scream as being corrupted but when its convenient for them they choose to quote out of it. There is no way of getting around the fact, the bible is clear, Abyssos is the place the demons are and NOT the earth uninhabited. Scripture interprets scripture. As for Rev 19, why dont you read verse Rev 19:15,
" And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God."
Rev 12:5
And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron:and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
Rev 2:26-27
And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
Any many more...
Once again a typical adventist tactic, you use one verse while ignoring the rest of the verses/prophecies on the subject from the new and old testament.
If you look at ALL of the scriptures on the subject of Jesus's second coming and the period right after as described in the New and Old testament, there is NO WAY it lines up with the adventist understanding. If you dont think that the adventist church is infallible (or Ellen W.) , than if someone points out clear error to you, why are you fighting it?? TheAbyssos error is very clear. If you cant see that than i feel sorry for you, because how are you to receive further light from God when your cup is already full?
Upvote
0