- Mar 12, 2007
- 4,208
- 519
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Labor
If we look at the US gun laws, contrasting causes want to leave people unprotected at home, except for police work and well tested license holders. Texans dislike like this from their traditions. Others want to save school children from attackers. How much does one give up to trust?
Then there are frozen embryos, some couples discard left over embryos. There is a balance between having children and discarding some when they are still embryos.
Then there is the rate of suicide among homosexual boys... and for them, large scale law changes are happening to make them feel better... so they live. But at the expense of some freedom of speech, and freedom of religion and enterprise.
Arguably it should not need to change the established, very good, of human rights and freedoms. It is like cutting and pasting a bit of communism into the democratic system and constitution. The Jehovah's Witnesses were given the right not to take blood transfusions. But a bulky part of society, is under threat of loss of freedoms and rights. To save a few people. Should we have to lose free speech or can it be done some other way as with the JWs?
Secular politicians don't think there is an afterlife...
How much are we expected to sacrifice for others? Are we really losing some because of secular politics?
Then there are frozen embryos, some couples discard left over embryos. There is a balance between having children and discarding some when they are still embryos.
Then there is the rate of suicide among homosexual boys... and for them, large scale law changes are happening to make them feel better... so they live. But at the expense of some freedom of speech, and freedom of religion and enterprise.
Arguably it should not need to change the established, very good, of human rights and freedoms. It is like cutting and pasting a bit of communism into the democratic system and constitution. The Jehovah's Witnesses were given the right not to take blood transfusions. But a bulky part of society, is under threat of loss of freedoms and rights. To save a few people. Should we have to lose free speech or can it be done some other way as with the JWs?
Secular politicians don't think there is an afterlife...
How much are we expected to sacrifice for others? Are we really losing some because of secular politics?