Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You and I BOTH know that those here who are at war with God's Ten Commandments will also agree that the term "Sabbath" as used in the Bible in the NT in that post - all refer to the seventh day of the week and not week-day 1. This is not because they all "read Ellen White" even though you have sought to "imagine for us" that Ellen White is to blame for all the problems of the BCF when it comes to point 7.
Baptist Confession of Faith
"From the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ this was the last day of the week, and from the resurrection of Christ it was changed to the first day of the week and called the Lord's Day. This is to be continued until the end of the world as the Christian Sabbath, the observation of the last day of the week having been abolished.
The Baptist Confession of Faith (1689)
Westminster Confession of Faith
"As it is the law of nature, that, in general, a due proportion of time be set apart for the worship of God; so, in His Word, by a positive, moral, and perpetual commandment binding all men in all ages, He has particularly appointed one day in seven, for a Sabbath, to be kept holy unto him:[34] which, from the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ, was the last day of the week: and, from the resurrection of Christ, was changed into the first day of the week,[35] which, in Scripture, is called the Lord's Day,[36] and is to be continued to the end of the world, as the Christian Sabbath.
Westminster Confession of Faith
Even in the Larry rant posts - the point is raised that point 7 in the list claims a "change" that the still binding, still applicable 4th commandment "Was changed to point to week-day-1".
You call it a "rant," but you know good and well that your entire deceitful...<obligatory rant deleted here>http://www.abaptistvoice.com/English/Articles/Miscelanous/WhyIAmABaptist.htm
Even in your own rant-style of posting you can't bring yourself to deny the point raised.
Originally Posted by LarryP2 CATHOLIC CATECHISM
2174 Jesus rose from the dead "on the first day of the week."104 Because it is the "first day," the day of Christ's Resurrection recalls the first creation. Because it is the "eighth day" following the sabbath,105 it symbolizes the new creation ushered in by Christ's Resurrection. For Christians it has become the first of all days, the first of all feasts, the Lord's Day (he kuriake hemera, dies dominica) Sunday:
Catechism of the Catholic Church - The third commandment
[FONT="]BobRyan said:You quote Catholic sources? They sure do love those SEVEN points from post #2
Wonderful! Me too!
===========================================
2056 The word "Decalogue" means literally "ten words."11 God revealed these "ten words" to his people on the holy mountain. They were written "with the finger of God,"12 unlike the other commandments written by Moses.13 They are pre-eminently the words of God. They are handed on to us in the books of Exodus 14 and Deuteronomy.15 Beginning with the Old Testament, the sacred books refer to the "ten words,"16 but it is in the New Covenant in Jesus Christ that their full meaning will be revealed.
2072 Since they express man's fundamental duties towards God and towards his neighbor, the Ten Commandments reveal, in their primordial content, grave obligations.They are fundamentally immutable, and they oblige always and everywhere. No one can dispense from them. the Ten Commandments are engraved by God in the human heart.
2063.... the words of the Decalogue remain likewise for us Christians. Far from being abolished, they have received amplification and development from the fact of the coming of the Lord in the flesh.26
2068 The Council of Trent teaches that the Ten Commandments are obligatory for Christiansand that the justified man is still bound to keep them;28 The Second Vatican Council confirms: "The bishops, successors of the apostles, receive from the Lord . . . the mission of teaching all peoples, and of preaching the Gospel to every creature, so that all men may attain salvation through faith, Baptism and the observance of the Commandments."29
(Application in James 2)
2069 The Decalogue forms a coherent whole. Each "word" refers to each of the others and to all of them; they reciprocally condition one another. the two tables shed light on one another; they form an organic unity. To transgress one commandment is to infringe all the others.30 One cannot honor another person without blessing God his Creator. One cannot adore God without loving all men, his creatures. the Decalogue brings man's religious and social life into unity.
Dies Domini pt 13 -
"the Sabbath ...is therefore rooted in the depths of God's plan. This is why unlike many other laws - it is not within the context of strictly cultic (Jewish) stipulations but within the Decalogue the "ten words" which represent the very pillars of moral life inscribed on the human heart!! In setting this commandment within the context of the basic structure of ethics, Israel and then the church declare that they consider it not just a matter of community religious discipline but a defining and indelible expression of our relationship to God, announced and expounded by biblical revelations.
The two views state their positions as “The Catholic church fully endorses the Sabbath commandment as edited by the Catholic Church" vs "the Catholic church fully endorsed the Sabbath commandment as worded by God at Sinai"
.
The Faith Explained (an RC commentary on the Baltimore catechism post Vatican ii) states on Page 242 that
====================begin short summary
changing the Lord's day to Sunday was in the power of the church since "in the gospels ..Jesus confers upon his church the power to make laws in his name".
page 243
"Nothing is said in the bible about the change of the Lord's day From Saturday to Sunday. We know of the change only from the tradition of the Church - a fact handed down to us...that is why we find so illogical the attitude of many Non-Catholics, who say that they will believe nothing unless they can find it in the bible and Yet will continue to keep Sunday as the Lord's day on the say-so of the Catholic church"
====================================== begin expanded quote
. (from "The Faith Explained" page 243.))
"we know that in the O.T it was the seventh day of the week - the Sabbath day - which was observed as the Lord's day. that was the law as God gave it...'remember to keep holy the Sabbath day.. the early Christian church determined as the Lord's day the first day of the week. That the church had the right to make such a law is evident...
The reason for changing the Lord's day from Saturday to Sunday lies in the fact that to the Christian church the first day of the week had been made double holy...
nothing is said in the bible about the change of the Lord's day from Saturday to Sunday..that is why we find so illogical the attitude of many non-Catholic who say they will believe nothing unless they can find it in the bible and yet will continue to keep Sunday as the Lord's day on the say-so of the Catholic church
[FONT="]====================end quote
[/FONT]
This is why the "Larry rant" does not work for ProgMonk.
in Christ,
Bob
In the NT the Sabbath is a day and not a commandment.Even in your own rant-style of posting you can't bring yourself to deny the point raised.
You yourself will admit that the term Sabbath used in the NT (and seen in Acts 13, 15, 17, 18...) refers to the seventh day of the week.
A point that does not fit with "The Change" language used in the BCF and WCF for the term "Sabbath" bent to apply to week-day-1 at the cross.
That is why you war against it -- in almost every post (and yet inexplicably) "as if" that helps ProgMonk's defense of the 4th commandment.
in Christ,
Bob
In the NT the Sabbath is a day and not a commandment.
Okay then, lets get some questions out of the way,
Were the Protestant Ministers and the Catholic Catechism that you frequently cite the Source for your Church’s doctrine of the Sabbath? ________YES___________NO
No - I have quoted only bible sources (And the BCF and WCF and other pro-Sunday sources obviously do not quote Ellen White to argue the Bible point that the 4th commandment is still applicable to the saints).Was Ellen G. White the source for your Church’s Sabbath Doctrine? ________YES___________NO
You dodged the question. In the NT is the term "Sabbath" a reference to "week day 1" or not?? This thread on the BCF claims it was bent to point to Week day 1 - by NT sources. (Staying on topic for a change )
Recall - the 7 point list of post 2 (in this case - the 7th point).
in Christ,
Bob
No, that's not what the argument is, the argument is The Lord's Day is the first day of the week .
BobRyan said:In section 22 of the BCF the argument is that the STill binding FOURTH commandment is "Changed" to point to week-day 1 (presumably by NT authors if the doctrine is to survive sola scriptura testing).
As we already saw with [FONT="]post #152
[/FONT]He has particularly appointed one day in seven for a Sabbath to be kept holy for Him. From the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ this was the last day of the week ("the seventh day is the Sabbath" Ex 20:11), and from the resurrection of Christ it (the 4th commandment - weekly Sabbath) was changed to the first day of the week
The Sabbath is kept holy to the Lord by those who, after the necessary preparation of their hearts and prior arranging of their common affairs, observe all day a holy rest from their own works
(Or did you also want to claim that the "Lord's Day was CHANGED" to week-day-1 ?? not just the 4th Commandment)
Okay then, lets get some questions out of the way,
BobRyan said:No - they simply prove that your own arguments against the TEN Commandments are flawed even by pro-Sunday source standards.
This part is incredibly obvious - so it is driving you to derail the subject.
that is the "easy part".
No - I have quoted only bible sources (And the BCF and WCF and other pro-Sunday sources obviously do not quote Ellen White to argue the Bible point that the 4th commandment is still applicable to the saints).LarryP2 said:Was Ellen G. White the source for your Churchs Sabbath Doctrine? ________YES___________NO
She herself was slow to accept this Bible doctrine as it was first presented by fellow Adventists. Many actual SDAs know that - as it turns out.
My aren't you being particularly slippery ...<factless rant deleted here to spare the readers>
...
Whereupon you repeat the questions while ignoring the answers.
hint: #196
I read the quotes to say the 1st day of the week is the Christian Sabbath. You say its the 7th day. And your so called Sunday sources support the 7th day. How?Here we find Larry unwittingly making the case for point 7 in the 7point list of post [FONT="]#2[/FONT]. (That the 4th commandment is not abolished but rather "bent")
Even in the Larry rant posts - the point is raised that point 7 in the list claims a "change" that the still binding, still applicable 4th commandment "Was changed to point to week-day-1".
Thus the 7 point list.
[FONT="]1. That the Sabbath Commandment is first given to mankind in Gen 2:1-3
2. That all mankind was obligated by the TEN commandments in the OT and to this very day.
3. That the seventh day as the Sabbath was Saturday the seventh day of the week from Gen 2:1-3 until NT times - including at the cross.
4. That the Ten Commandments are the moral Law of God
5. That the moral law of God is written on the heart under the New Covenant
6. that the Ten Commandments as the moral law of God are in no way opposed to grace and the Gospel.
7. That the Sabbath commandment can rightly be BENT by man-made-tradition to point to week-day-1 after the cross[FONT="].
Where even Larry cannot bring himself to imagine that the word "Sabbath" in the NT means "week day 1". An obvious point that we can see in Acts 13, Acts 15, Acts 17, Acts 18...
[/FONT][/FONT]
in Christ,
Bob
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?