Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Prior to the construction of major dams along its route, the Colorado River fed one of the largest desert estuaries in the world. Spread across the northernmost end of the Gulf of California, the Colorado River delta’s vast riparian, freshwater, brackish, and tidal wetlands once covered 7,810 km² (1,930,000 acres)
Easy answer right? Where did all that rock went? I am not refering to rivers on soils or plains but this picture that I kept refering to https://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/colorado-river_david-morgan_istock-1980.jpg
And I already showed you those are not the changes I am looking for. For now I give up asking you to produce more complex examples. I am just asking you that with this claim that "Cetaceans and their common ancestor had two more alanines in this sequence than all the other mammals examined", do you have repeatable veriable tests that show the above claim can happen in nature.
You have a silly cartoon T guyThis is a particularly silly error. The structure is a partially-eroded anticline:
You have a silly cartoon T guy
Luke 17:27
Ha, You really think you're old enough to tell me what I'm looking at ? You might think you can run over me like you try to do these others but I think you're funny ..You're looking at rock layers folded upward in the anticline. Here's how they work:
I notice in the shot that someone has dug out some material at the margins of the layers, to make them look more distinct. But they still look like rock layers, not beams of wood.
Creationist commentators, such as Andrew Snelling in the Creation Ministries International journal Creation, wrote that "there are no scientific principles employed" in the "so-called frequency generator" used by Wyatt's team. He called it a "gadget, which is generally advertised in treasure-hunting magazines, not scientific journals" with "brass welding rods being used in essence, as divining rods, similar to the use of a forked stick to search for water."[16]
Fasold asserted in his 1988 book that locals call one of the peaks near to the Durupinar site al Cudi (Turkish Cudi Dagi, Kurdish Çîyaye Cûdî) and linked this to the Mount Judi named in the Quran as the final resting place of Noah's Ark.[4] The assertion is controversial and not well supported by local toponymy.
After a few expeditions to the Durupınar site that included drilling and excavation in the 1990s, Fasold began to have doubts that the Durupınar formation was Noah's ark. He visited the site in September 1994 with Australian geologist Ian Plimer and concluded that the structure was not a boat.[15] He surmised that ancient peoples had erroneously believed the site was the ark.[15][17] In 1996, Fasold co-wrote a paper with geologist Lorence Collins titled "Bogus 'Noah's Ark' from Turkey Exposed as a Common Geologic Structure", which concluded that the boat-shaped formation was a natural stone formation that merely resembled a boat. The same paper pointed out that the "anchors" were local volcanic stone.[17] The abstract reads:
A natural rock structure near Dogubayazit, Turkey, has been misidentified as Noah's Ark. Microscopic studies of a supposed iron bracket show that it is derived from weathered volcanic minerals. Supposed metal-braced walls are natural concentrations of limonite and magnetite in steeply inclined sedimentary layers in the limbs of a doubly plunging syncline. Supposed fossilized gopherwood bark is crinkled metamorphosed peridotite. Fossiliferous limestone, interpreted as cross cutting the syncline, preclude the structure from being Noah's Ark because these supposed "Flood" deposits are younger than the "Ark." Anchor stones at Kazan (Arzap) are derived from local andesite and not from Mesopotamia.[17]
In April 1997, in sworn testimony at an Australian court case, Fasold repeated his doubts and noted that he regarded the claim that Noah's ark had been found as "absolute BS".
Durupınar site - Wikipedia
I don't assume it has been flowing any longer than it has . There is a delta and sediment rate that can be reasonably measured since we've been measuring it , anything else is speculation including old Earth ..
