Republicans Reject Motion to Impeach Joe Biden

[BPPLEE]

The fact that an investigation is going on is evidence of any wrong doing? Shall we apply this to Trump too?
"Where there’s smoke there’s fire."

If you want to, be my guest, do whatever you please

 

[driewerf]

If you want to, be my guest, do whatever you please

I don't want to. I want to know if it's universally applicable. But you did answer with a non-answer.

 

[eleos1954]

Round and round we go. What specific information has been disclosed so far showing criminal activity by Joe Biden?

you can go look up and watch the hearings ... there has been big money transactions (per bank records) within several biden family members with no explanation (as of yet) what they were for.

 

[BPPLEE]

I don't want to. I want to know if it's universally applicable. But you did answer with a non-answer.

I’m not Trump’s lawyer

 

[eleos1954]

Is there any evidence showing that there's a reason to think they weren't?
Because if not, seems like a politically motivated witch hunt rather than a legitimate investigation. Don't GOP legislators have anything better to do?

According to bank records there were large money transfers through the LLC's to various biden family reasons ... and thus far no explanation for them.

 

[KCfromNC]

According to bank records there were large money transfers through the LLC's to various biden family reasons ... and thus far no explanation for them.

Why would there be a need to explain them?

 

[KCfromNC]

you can go look up and watch the hearings

What evidence of illegal activity would I learn of if I did? Which hearings? Which witnesses? What evidence?

I mean it is great to handwave at hours and hours and hours of hearings as if there's something there - but is there actually anything there?

 

[A2SG]

The fact that an investigation is going on is evidence of any wrong doing? Shall we apply this to Trump too?
"Where there’s smoke there’s fire."

Absolutely.

Grand juries indict over evidence, not suspicion. So there is evidence of wrongdoing for Trump. He even has a couple of guilty verdicts already, to add to the other fraud charges he's been proven guilty of beforehand (Trump University, etc.).

Where's the evidence of wrongdoing for President Biden?

-- A2SG, all smoke, no fire so far...with a few mirrors thrown in for good measure...

 

[APersonWithNoName]

In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office.

The senate majority is held by the democrats ... regardless of what evidence is presented the senate majority would never vote to impeach the president. So the left knows this would not happen so of course they "push" for it.

The right knows this as well and this inquiry can only serve as information being publicly known (presented) to the public in hopes the next upcoming elections will swing to the right.

There will be no impeachment and this inquiry will continue (presenting information) until the next election.

this

 

[DaisyDay]

Where's the evidence of wrongdoing for President Biden?

Not here (Lev Parnas hold phone for Rudy and Shokin):

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773170300965847280

 

[eleos1954]

Why would there be a need to explain them?

Tax returns

 

[Fantine]

In their dreams!

I want them to earn their money working for us, not wasting time on hopeless goose chases.

 

[DaisyDay]

Tax returns

Pres. and Dr. Biden have made their tax returns public for some time. Donald, despite his campaign promises, never did.

 

[stevil]

I don't want to. I want to know if it's universally applicable. But you did answer with a non-answer.

The way I understand it.
If Trump is under investigation, it is a witch hunt
If Biden is under investigation it is evidence he has a crime family

If a Republican speaks out against Trump doing criminal activity then he/she is a RINO (lots and lots of exTrump admin people <the best people> in this category now)
If a person speaks out against Biden he is a "highly credible, multi lingual, extremely trustworthy, long time confidential FBI informant" (well, at least until he gets criminally charged for lying and pushing Russian propaganda)

 

[BPPLEE]

The way I understand it.
If Trump is under investigation, it is a witch hunt
If Biden is under investigation it is evidence he has a crime family

If a Republican speaks out against Trump doing criminal activity then he/she is a RINO (lots and lots of exTrump admin people <the best people> in this category now)
If a person speaks out against Biden he is a "highly credible, multi lingual, extremely trustworthy, long time confidential FBI informant" (well, at least until he gets criminally charged for lying and pushing Russian propaganda)

Doesn’t say much for the FBI does it?

 

[stevil]

Doesn’t say much for the FBI does it?

Doesn't say much for Comer's impeachment investigation or for Fox News' opinion shows' enthusiasm for truth.

 

[BPPLEE]

Doesn't say much for Comer's impeachment investigation or for Fox News' opinion shows' enthusiasm for truth.

How much did they pay the informant?

 

[loveofourlord]

In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office.

The senate majority is held by the democrats ... regardless of what evidence is presented the senate majority would never vote to impeach the president. So the left knows this would not happen so of course they "push" for it.

The right knows this as well and this inquiry can only serve as information being publicly known (presented) to the public in hopes the next upcoming elections will swing to the right.

There will be no impeachment and this inquiry will continue (presenting information) until the next election.

except it's an election year and if they had damning enough evidence to impeach biden, it would hurt his chances of being elected regardless of what happened.

 

[stevil]

How much did they pay the informant?

Comer and Fox news paid dearly for their reputation, don't know if they gave the informant money though.
However, in saying that. MAGAs don't fault Comer and Fox news opinion hosts, in fact if they had spoke the truth, the MAGAs would have likely instead switched to another "news" source, like they did when Fox News called the election for Biden.

 

[BPPLEE]

Comer and Fox news paid dearly for their reputation, don't know if they gave the informant money though.
However, in saying that. MAGAs don't fault Comer and Fox news opinion hosts, in fact if they had spoke the truth, the MAGAs would have likely instead switched to another "news" source, like they did when Fox News called the election for Biden.

I can’t speak for MAGAs,