No, I have not conflated anything.
Men who were
NEVER MEANT to be saved are
(a) destined to damnation and
(b) not able to repent
You politely requested Scripture to refute your claim and
I politely
PROVIDED several examples of Scripture.
That
REFUTE your doctrine. I will re-post them for you:
The
FIRST TIME I posted #1-#4 (below) you completely
ignored them. Would you be so polite (this time) to actually
ADDRESS the passages I provided to you? Please do not
PRETEND this information is not
PART of the Gospel by
intentionally ignoring it.
(1) It REALLY does not matter what you believe. The Bible is clear,
and history confirms, some men were
NEVER MEANT to be saved.
Tell me... during the Jewish Kingdom, how many Gentiles were saved?
Of course the answer demonstrates how many Gentiles were
NEVER MEANT to be saved.
(2)
Mark 4:11-12 teaches that some men were
NEVER MEANT
to "
perceive" or "
understand" or "
be converted" or to ever have
"
their sins forgiven". Clearly men who were not meant to have
"
their sins forgiven" are men
NEVER MEANT to be saved.
(3)
Romans 9 speaks of God
CREATING some men to be
"
vessels of mercy" (they were meant to be saved) and others as
"
vessels of wrath" (they were
NEVER MEANT to be saved).
God also speaks of
CREATING some men to be "
vessels of honor"
(they are meant to be saved) and others as "
vessels of dishonor"
(they are
NEVER MEANT to be saved).
(4) Jesus explained in
Matthew 13 that the church consists
of MANY unsaved "
tares/goats" sown by Satan and destined
to the same fire prepared for Satan and his demons (clearly
these men were
NEVER MEANT to be saved). Jesus also
speaks of some in the church who are saved "
wheat/sheep"
sown by God and destined to eternal life (clearly those men
are meant to be saved)
(5) The Bible is very clear, there are three (3) types of people
(1) the saved "
wheat" in the church destined to heaven
(2) the unsaved "
tares" in the church, destined to hell
(3) the lost souls
OUTSIDE the church, also destined to hell
If you do not understand this
CONTEXT of the Bible then you
have little hope of understanding the
MEANING of passages
which talk about ONE (1) of these three (3) groups of men.
BTW... I understand that the Biblical
FACT that some men
were
NEVER MEANT to be saved immediately destroys the
false gospel that all men are ABLE to be saved. But that
does not change this Biblical
FACT.
And, the fact that God commands all men to repent does NOT
mean that ANY man is ABLE to repent. The fact is,
NO MAN
is able to repent until AFTER he is regenerated.
Repentance is the
RESULT of regeneration...
and never the
CAUSE.
First, I am not disputing that men are
COMMANDED to repent
or that they are
ACCOUNTABLE for not repenting. However,
(as shown in examples #1-#4 above) the fact that some men
are
NEVER MEANT to be saved (or believe/repent) does not
negate the command to do so.
Secondly... it is not ME that "paints God as the author of sin",
that is just a strawman you have constructed to protect your
system from contradicting what GOD HAS SAID.
I gave you examples #1-#4 (above) where GOD (not me)
shows some men were
NEVER MEANT to be saved or repent.
You do not have to
LIKE what the Bible teaches and you do not
have to
ACCEPT what the Bible teaches... but you are only
embarrassing yourself by saying that the
WORD OF GOD
(shown in examples #1-#4) are just my words.
So go ahead... try to refute what
GOD has taught
in examples #1-#4 instead of constructing a strawman
that I make God the author of sin - while you intentionally IGNORE
the Gospel teachings provided in examples #1-#4 (above)
You do not have to
LIKE or A
CCEPT the Biblical teaching that
NO MAN can come to Jesus unless the Father "
draws" them
and
ALL MEN the Father draws "
shall come" to Christ and He
will lose
NONE of them....
The Bible is very clear that men are
UNABLE to come to God
unless they are "
elect". That is why the Bible declares in boththe
OT and NT that
NO MAN will ever "
seek God"
(no, not even one)
unless they are regenerated [Rom 3:10-12]
So you have never read that:
MANY are called
["called" by the Gospel]
but
FEW are chosen
["chosen" to be saved]
You do not have to
LIKE the Gospel, you do not have to
ACCEPT the Gospel... you can even call the Gospel "folly",
but you are
mocking the
WORD OF GOD (not me)
But GOD has already responded to that (humanistic) doctrine:
Read the following passage
CLOSELY because it is addressing
the
SAME ARGUMENT you make - God is a cruel tormentor.
Rom 9:19
Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?
Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to
make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the
vessels of wrath fitted to destruction: And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore
prepared unto glory,
As I already showed you (but you chose to IGNORE)
God creates "
vessels of mercy"
(elect) and "
vessels of wrath"
God creates "
vessels of honor"
(elect) and "
vessels of dishonor"
You do not have to
LIKE what the Gospel teaches... but you
can never
CHANGE the Gospel by ignoring what it teaches.
Remember, everyone (both the "
wheat and tares") are born
"
wicked" and
NONE will ever "
seek God"
(no, not even one)
unless they are elect. But that Gospel FACT does not mean
the unsaved "
tares" sown by Satan can
decide to become
the saved "
wheat" sown by God.
So... how about ADDRESSING the SCRIPTURES presented
in #1-#4 (above) instead of continuing to CONFLATE what
the Bible says about the saved "
wheat" with what it says
about the unsaved "
tares"... they are NOT the same.
I have made it VERY SIMPLE for you.
Just
REFUTE #1, then #2, then #3 and then #4
Can you do that?
Jim