Rejection of evolution correlates with racism

[Mr Laurier]

You're wrong.Can I submit a pic and a hypothetical like you did?

Thanks.

Suppose the entire human race -- sans Noah's line -- looked like this:

And lived in extreme pain due to being so mutated?

In addition, they were racked with STDs that would make Woodstock look like Snow White's rose garden.

Get the picture?

Genesis 6:12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.

At no point has the entire human species ever looked like this.
At no point did even a significant minority look like the cutesy character you offer.

I'm not sure what you mean be "mutated"... But mutations generally do not cause pain. In addition, we have historical records that indicate humans were fairly healthy before the industrial era.

STDs have been an anomaly for most of human history before the medieval period. So your bizzare equivalence is in fact accurate. Woodstock was never wracked with STDs.


Your hypothetical is pure nonsense

 

[Mr Laurier]

God took care of the necessities.

He does say why He did it though, and that might be why you need to know why it was necessary.

That's what academia does to the mind.

Confuses things.

Your portrayal of God, shows him to be a raving maniac.

Academia does not confuse anything.

 

[AV1611VET]

At no point has the entire human species ever looked like this.

Oh ... well ... I stand correct then, Mr Ewerthere.

 

[Mr Laurier]

Oh ... well ... I stand correct then, Mr Ewerthere.

Huh?
What is this "Mr Ewerthere" you invoke?

 

[AV1611VET]

Your portrayal of God, shows him to be a raving maniac.

If God truly was a "raving maniac," wouldn't academia be able to understand Him?

Or let me ask it this way:

If He wasn't a "raving maniac," would you and your collection of collegiate cohorts know it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Huh?
What is this "Mr Ewerthere" you invoke?

Oh, sorry.

I must have gotten you mixed up with someone who was there.

My apologies.

 

[Mr Laurier]

If God truly was a "raving maniac," wouldn't academia be able to understand Him?

Or let me ask it this way:

If He wasn't a "raving maniac," would you and your collection of collegiate cohorts know it?

two separate questions.

And me lack of a "collection of collegiate cohorts", makes the second question moot.

 

[Mr Laurier]

Oh, sorry.

I must have gotten you mixed up with someone who was there.

My apologies.

No. You obviously did no such thing. BE HONEST!

 

[TLK Valentine]

Oh, sorry.

I must have gotten you mixed up with someone who was there.

Yourself, perhaps?

 

[Mr Laurier]

Whose will is it when atheists murder people?

the atheist who murdered someone. Thats who's will it is.

 

[Mr Laurier]

This thread turned into a discussion about Christians following orders from God to do immoral acts. Whose orders are atheists following when they murder people?

their own

 

[AV1611VET]

two separate questions.

And me lack of a "collection of collegiate cohorts", makes the second question moot.

IOW NEI to answer?

 

[AV1611VET]

No. You obviously did no such thing. BE HONEST!

Honestly.

Assuming "Ewerthere" is wrong.

 

[AV1611VET]

Yourself, perhaps?

Nah.

I don't need to be.

I'm not the one misunderstanding.

 

[Mr Laurier]

IOW NEI to answer?

I cannot decipher your code.
Try being clear, instead of talking in jibberish.

 

[Mr Laurier]

Honestly.

Assuming "Ewerthere" is wrong.

Who or what is "Ewerthere"?

 

[TLK Valentine]

Nah.

I don't need to be.

I'm not the one misunderstanding.

Sure you are. You're all over the place telling us all about what God did, didn't do, must have done, couldn't have done... as if you were there.

 

[AV1611VET]

BE HONEST!

Would you know it if I was?

 

[essentialsaltes]

Who or what is "Ewerthere"?

You-were-there

 

[Bradskii]

Huh?
What is this "Mr Ewerthere" you invoke?

If you make a statement about something that happened with which the other guy doesn't agree, then he'll reject it because you 'needed to have been there' to be able to verify it. Note that the reverse in not the case.

And yes, I know it's a schoolyard level argument. But that should give you a heads-up as regards the debating prowess of the person who makes it. How you respond is up to you. A face palm is often used.