The analogy is giving you the reason for not making stupid choices like giving up your salvation the way Esau gave up his birthright.Don't make stupid choices.
The only significant choices we make are those that affect our salvation.
It was both a privilege and honor for Christ to go to the cross to help those that totally did not deserve His help. These rewards are not as great but similar in nature (serving others). The context is not some rewards, but salvation is the prize.Don't lose your reward by making bad choices. That is the context, not salvation.
The error is treating eternal life like some kind of coin or an object that can be lost, given away, etc. Salvation is so much more than that. It's not accurate to view salvation in the way that your view does. We become actual children of God. Can you give away your status of child to your parents? Of course not.
A birthright is so much more than a coin or object, also.Since there is no verse anywhere in the Bible that describes the election of Israel as a gift, there is no reason to use that for Rom 11:29. Paul was clear in his letter to the Romans about what he meant by "gift". He defined it clearly.
We are children of God because we chose to be children of God. We can also go from being one of his children to being a child of satan: John 8:44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your fathers desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him
That is extrapolating Pauls reference to the gift the Jews were given.Right. Election is not about salvation. But the gift of eternal life is irrevocable, according to Paul.
Again Gal. 6:8-10 is saying you can give up and thus give away the harvest of eternal life (as Paul specifically says).Except there isn't any verse in the Bible to suggest such a thing. Can one give away their physical relationship to their parents? No.
To be born a Jew prior to Christ was a huge gift, so what would you call it?I see nothing here of relevancy to what God's gifts are. You've not established that Paul was "thinking" of the election of Israel as a gift. And nowhere is that ever described as a gift.
Please don't put quotes around reward. The promise of reward is real and promised to every believer who lives an obedient faithful life on earth. And those who don't will forfeit their reward.
Are you saying: the indwelling Holy Spirit is not a gift?What they didn't yet is the reward promised. But all faithful believers will receive the reward. Remember when we get rewarded; when Christ returns, per Rev 22:12.
This is not relevant to the issue of gifts.
Are you say those prior to Christ also got the gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit?
Was the Spirit not promised to those after Pentecost and not to those before?
You are the one saying the promise could not be the indwelling Holy Spirit, yet it was not promised to them before?
Sorry it is spiritual. This is a huge other topic.Nope. It is not spiritual but physical and real. Rev 21:1 and 2 Pet both are talking about the same thing.
No. Ro 8:38 prevents that.
Paul told you specifically eternal life, you have added blessing and taken away eternal life?You've missed the point. To reap refers to blessings, not just eternal life. And I gave supporting verses to affirm this.
The Christian has both and you really cannot get life without an abundant life?The unbeliever isn't even relevant here. Apples to oranges. The contrast is either having life, or having life more abundantly. Which would you rather have?
Yes! Every saved individual gets not only a life, but also gets to be a part of Gods work while here on earth (we have a wonderful objective) and we can actually share in Gods Glory by having God live and work through us and thus as God is glorified in us we share in that glory by our presence.
They should count all the suffering as their joy?This isn't about life on this earth. As Heb 11 reveals, many believers suffered greatly. While God was glorified by their work, what were they feeling? They will be rewarded.
Gal. 6:8-10I'm always amazed at the apparent lack of understanding or appreciation for the doctrine of eternal rewards. So many believers seem to fight the very idea.
I said this:
"At that point, the die is cast. He HAS become a new creature, born again, a child of God. Where does Scripture teach that these are reversible or forfeited?"
None of what I listed can be reversed. No verse even suggests such a thing.
They go together and cannot be separated.And none of these can be given up. And free will has nothing to do with the things that God does for us. We don't help Him getting these things, and we can't undo what God does. Preposterous to even think that way.
The same as the comparison between life and abundant life.
I did nothing for either and am happy for either?What's the difference between having a crop and having an abundant crop?
That does not explain any benefit to having free will? You say we have free will and yet a very important free will choice we could make is not available to us, so why have free will at all?Huh? Generally we mess up with our choices. I said no one holds their salvation by freewill and no one can lose their salvation by freewill. Your comment doesn't seem relevant to the issue.
I am talking about before the angels joined with satan were they gifted with salvation by God?Apparently not. The Bible describes fallen and elect angels.
You cannot say: lack of evidence is evidence for the opposite. Just because it is not written in scripture: Being born a Jew prior to Christs coming was a gift from God, does not mean it is not a gift from God.I prefer how Scripture describes gifts, not how you or I would. And Israel's election is NEVER described as a gift. So, Biblically, one cannot say that Rom 11:29 refers to Israel's election.
The trinity is never mentioned in scripture so does that mean it does not exist?
That is not good hermeneutics; context can change in a letter and especially a long letter like Romans.Context within the letter. That is totally legit. And see where Paul describes what he calls "gift".
Mark 10:42 Jesus called them together and said, You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. 43 Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, 44 and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. 45 For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.The Bible teaches it. But, please don't forget; there are severe warnings to those of God's children to disobey. Ain't purty.
He was teaching humility among His disciples.
Yes it does.I believe the verse is quite clear about not losing what was worked for.
I think it's sad how many believers have no understanding of this. It should be obvious that Satan doesn't want God's children to know about it.
I said this:
"Which scenario seems better:
to be in heaven but having no position of authority or sharing in the rulership of Christ, or to have a position of authority and sharing in the rulership of Christ?
Some people will say they will be happy just to be near Jesus in heaven. Well, that's quite nice. But guess what: to be near Him, one must have earned a throne on which to sit to be near Him. Because only those who have earned that privilege and reward will be the closest to Him.
So, the point of Hebrews: take your pick. Rewards through works, or not."
Your response doesn't address my question.
Mark 10:42 Jesus called them together and said, You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. 43 Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, 44 and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. 45 For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.
10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.Of course. And I know what awaits those who live this way.
To clarify once again; yes, believers can become rebellious, just like natural children in this world. But There is nothing in Rom 8:38 to differentiate what is "outward" vs "inward", as you've tried to suggest.
That verse is very clear; there is NOTHING in the present nor the future that can separate us from God's love. Paul is talking about anything that MAY OCCUR IN THE FUTURE. There is nothing about outward vs inward. Paul covered it all by "nothing present nor future".
Sure, for loss of significant reward. We are always accountable for our actions.
2 Cor 5:10 is very clear. And it isn't about loss of salvation.
Whatever good I do in this life was because I allowed the Holy Spirit to work through me and do it. The bad I did on my own. The bad was forgiven and forgotten by God and thus would only have significance if it was not forgiven.
In the other judgment passages there is only the separation between the sheep and the goats, there is no degrees of rewards.
Upvote
0