Really, you don't know?
Really?
Trump's buddy, Putin was attacking USA's ally Ukraine and Ukraine needed Javelins to defend themselves against Russian tanks.
But Trump said he wasn't going to give the Javelins until Zelenski declared on USA tv that he was opening an investigation into Biden (Trump's key political opponent).
Read through that, and think about what the quid pro quo is.
So, he didn't have any evidence. Uh, huh.
And what exactly was Guliani's job? Trump's personal attorney. Guliani doesn't work for USA, he isn't a diplomat, he isn't in congress. Why was he trying to convince Zelenski to go after a particular USA person?
Think about it, yeah.
Nope, that's not it.
If Guliani somehow had evidence of a crime, he is supposed to hand it over to the authorities, not fly out to Ukraine and get a personal audience with Zelenski and try to convince him to start an investigation into Joe Biden. That's not what civilians do, that's not what personal attorney's do.
And was it just a coincidence that the subject was Joe Biden? Really???
This isn't at all the proper channel to be addressing corruption through. And they shouldn't be giving Javelins only contingent on publicly claiming having an investigation into someone.
To believe the narrative you have put through, a person would have to be very gullible.
If they had evidence, then they should have handed it over, no conditions, just hand it over.
Really? Send a personal attourney and get him to demand an investigation but not give any evidence..... Really?????
And as we know, that didn't happen at all.
Biden got a prosecutor removed because the prosecutor was refusing to do investigations.
I would imagine that Trump will stop being investigated when there isn't strong evidence for a crime he hasn't yet been charged with.
