Reality vs Atheism?

[AV1611VET]

Not seeing how not knowing leads to a loss of reality. You are making to big of a jump there.

You guys don't realize how much reality you're denying.

That's because science is myopic.

 

[pitabread]

You guys don't realize how much reality you're denying.

Irony much?

 

[Paulos23]

You guys don't realize how much reality you're denying.

That's because science is myopic.

No, just being honest about our limit of knowlage. It is Christians like you that like to fill in the gaps with God without evidence.

 

[AV1611VET]

It is Christians like you that like to fill in the gaps with God without evidence.

Merry Christmas!

 

[joinfree]

I see that argumentum ad Youtubum is as strong as ever. Was there some point you wanted to convey?

What is better: to accept God or reject Reality?

 

[joinfree]

Not seeing how not knowing leads to a loss of reality. You are making to big of a jump there.

Science knows, that there is no Reality. Do you like it? It is result of Atheism.

 

[bhsmte]

What is better: to accept God or reject Reality?

As I have already have asked; what reality are you referring to in your OP?

 

[pitabread]

Science knows, that there is no Reality. Do you like it? It is result of Atheism.

 

[jayem]

If we evolved from other organisms what type of organisms will be become in the future?

It depends on the environment in which we will live. Environment is the driving force of evolution by natural selection. Whatever traits promote the reproductive success of a species within a given environmental niche will be favored. So over time, the members of that species will possess those traits.

Though based on what we know from the fossil record--virtually all species will eventually go extinct. Some environmental change occurs that is too sudden or extreme. There are not enough favorable alleles in a species' genome that will allow the species to survive by evolving. IIRC, mammal species seem to go extinct after about 4 million years. I'm not trying to be a Debbie Downer. But unless we develop the technology to leave this planet and survive elsewhere, Homo sapiens will likely have the same fate. That appears to be biological reality.

 

[Paulos23]

Science knows, that there is no Reality. Do you like it? It is result of Atheism.

I think you are making to big of a jump of logic. Show your work.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Science does not know all, but something. This something includes: lost of Reality. Thus, only God can save us from mental case!

Are you struggling with a mental case that you want god to save you from?

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

What is better: to accept God or reject Reality?

False dichotomy fallacy.

 

[joinfree]

I think you are making to big of a jump of logic. Show your work.

Don't be liar: watch videos.

 

[joinfree]

False dichotomy fallacy.

No, it is not the choice. It is the philosophical consideration: what would seem to be better: 1) accept God, or 2) reject reality.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

No, it is not the choice. It is the philosophical consideration: what would seem to be better: 1) accept God, or 2) reject reality.

Neither, they're both irrational.

 

[bhsmte]

No, it is not the choice. It is the philosophical consideration: what would seem to be better: 1) accept God, or 2) reject reality.

You still have failed to define and demonstrate, what this reality is you talk about.

 

[dmmesdale]

Atheists can't see into the future any better than believers can.

Prediction can be made based on what we do know.

Atheism does not try to answer questions about the universe,

Atheists do.

it's purely a non belief in a God or Gods.

Right a negative belief about God, Not a lack belief. Since outhouses lack belief. In that sense, it is a negative truth claim about all of reality.

It is not a denial of God,

It is denial. How could it not be?

if you show sufficient evidence for a God then I would be open to it,

No you would not.

and most atheists would welcome such evidence,

No they would not. Their mind is slammed shut.

unfortunately you have hit us with everything you have and it's not sufficient.

The problem is not with the evidence.

Atheism does not rely on any scientific theory,

Agree. Many atheists rely on atheistic creation myths about imaginary creatures etc. The misuse of science as a ruse to validate their atheistic convictions.

it is just a position on one particular issue that's all.

It is a position that comes with consequences.

 

[pitabread]

No they would not. Their mind is slammed shut.

Irony much? (Part II)

 

[bhsmte]

Irony much? (Part II)

Part III, should come shortly.

 

[Speedwell]

It is denial. How could it not be?

It could merely be indifference.