Real time or evo time?

[dad]

Believe what you want to believe. You will anyway.

It's not me who's wrong.... it's everyone else!

When you get more than beliefs and want to call them science, get back to us then I guess.

 

[dad]

I can show that dad has to ignore all rules of evidence in order to deny that there is evidence for a same state past.

The rules of the present state do not apply and they are the only rules you go by! They are the tent that all so called evidence must reside in for you. How small minded and petty.

 

[dad]

Just answer the question.

Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?

Anser the question, do you have some DNA from the time of creation and the flood etc? Yes or no? Obviously not. Do not pretend you have a suspect or evidence! Hoo ha

 

[dad]

Dad is master of the art of ad hoc hypotheses. ...

It is childish to call names. You can call thinking beyond the science knowledge puddle 'as hoc' all you like. Come on over to where oceans are deep ad fresh clean water abounds.

 

[ViaCrucis]

It is childish to call names. You can call thinking beyond the science knowledge puddle 'as hoc' all you like. Come on over to where oceans are deep ad fresh clean water abounds.

Ad hoc, not as hoc.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[Derek Meyer]

It is childish to call names.

I agree that is is childish to call all those hundreds of thousands of cosmologists and astrophysicists from all over the world 'evolutionists'.

 

[dad]

I agree that is is childish to call all those hundreds of thousands of cosmologists and astrophysicists from all over the world 'evolutionists'.

Call the silly false prophets whatever you like.

 

[lesliedellow]

Call the silly false prophets whatever you like.

I will buy Dad a dictionary for Christmas, so that he can look up the definition of the word "prophet."

 

[AirPo]

Call the silly false prophets whatever you like.

How about "dad"?

 

[Loudmouth]

The rules of the present state do not apply and they are the only rules you go by!

It is the rules of reason and evidence.

When the facts match the hypothesis, then the hypothesis is accepted as true. That's how it works.

 

[Loudmouth]

Anser the question, do you have some DNA from the time of creation and the flood etc? Yes or no? Obviously not. Do not pretend you have a suspect or evidence! Hoo ha

I asked first. Answer the question.


Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?

 

[Loudmouth]

It is childish to call names. You can call thinking beyond the science knowledge puddle 'as hoc' all you like. Come on over to where oceans are deep ad fresh clean water abounds.

You can't even describe what the word "evidence" means. There is nothing in your ocean.

 

[dad]

I will buy Dad a dictionary for Christmas, so that he can look up the definition of the word "prophet."

Meanwhile let's see a demo pf prophesy from renowned men of science....

"
tephen Hawking is (yet again) a harbinger of bad things to come: During the BBC's yearly Reith Lectures, the physicist said the science and technology advances made by the human race would likely be its undoing. In response to a question about how the world would end, Hawking pointed to nuclear warfare, global warming, and genetically engineered viruses as examples of how man-made threats could bring about its demise.

"Although the chance of a disaster to planet Earth in a given year may be quite low, it adds up over time, and becomes a near certainty in the next thousand or ten thousand years," Hawking said, according to the BBC. "By that time we should have spread out into space, and to other stars, so a disaster on Earth would not mean the end of the human race."

http://www.fastcompany.com/3055651/fast-feed/stephen-hawking-foretells-the-end-of-the-world-again


Or here..

"What is the ultimate fate of our universe? A Big Crunch? A Big Freeze? A Big Rip? or a Big Bounce? Measurements made by WMAP or the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe favor a Big Freeze. But until a deeper understanding of dark energy is established, the other three still cannot be totally ignored."

http://www.universetoday.com/37105/fate-of-the-universe/


Hahaha pity the poor folks that believe any of this nonsense and false prophesy.

 

[dad]

I asked first. Answer the question.


Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?

You have no DNA from the early creation era, so be honest.

 

[dad]

It is the rules of reason and evidence.

You have none. So any rules you make u are worthless.

When the facts match the hypothesis, then the hypothesis is accepted as true. That's how it works.

When modern hypotheses are all based on religion, what actually needs matching is fact and evidences. Show independent proof of dates (not involving supposed radioactive decay in the far past) for anything in the KT era?

 

[joshua 1 9]

It's all just made up stuff.

So are you admitting that everything you say and everything you do on here is just "made up stuff"? Do you just kinda make it up as you go along?

 

[lesliedellow]

So are you admiring that everything you say and everything you do on here is just "made up stuff"? Do you just kinda make it up as you go along?

Dreaming up ad hoc hypotheses, to explain away inconvenient facts, tends to be creationists' speciality. But, since they form part of no coherent theory, and there only function is to explain things away, those ad hoc hypotheses eventually end up contradicting one another.

 

[Loudmouth]

You have no DNA from the early creation era, so be honest.

Answer the question.


Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?

 

[Loudmouth]

You have none. So any rules you make u are worthless.
When modern hypotheses are all based on religion, what actually needs matching is fact and evidences. Show independent proof of dates (not involving supposed radioactive decay in the far past) for anything in the KT era?

Answer the question.


Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?

 

[AirPo]

So are you admiring that everything you say and everything you do on here is just "made up stuff"? Do you just kinda make it up as you go along?

With respect to The HI theory, yes. That's what it's all about.