Then let's see it, with evidence.
Those are claims. I am asking for evidence.
The measured ratios in rocks are very real. Please show me how they are inconsistent with a same state past.
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Radioactive dating
- Thread starter dad
- Start date
Then let's see it, with evidence.
Those are claims. I am asking for evidence.
The measured ratios in rocks are very real. Please show me how they are inconsistent with a same state past.
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
It is a deception to call ratios clocks when you do not know the state in the past! Think about it.
Upvote
0
We don't have to call them clocks. We can just call them ratios.
How are the observed ratios of isotopes in rocks inconsistent with a same state past? (notice that there was no mention of clocks)
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
They are consistant with creation. Whether they jive with your fantasy past or not doesn't matter.
Upvote
0
It's not man . . . its God's Universe that tells us the truths about its age and history. We only have to learn how to listen.
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
No it is an appeal to faith in man over God's word. You think man's interpretation of creation outranks God's.
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Too bad you have only beliefs that you paint on evidences then.
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
No. Creation is consistent with the actual past, not your unproven pagan past!
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
You wrote your post. You are not qualified to sat what the Spirit of God did or did not do. You can't see Him.
Upvote
0
It's not a matter of who is 'qualified', it's a matter of what people say, the strength of their arguments and the evidence that they base them on. And BTW, how are you qualified to say who else is qualified about what?
For God to have written The Bible, there needs to be a God. The evidence of The Bible is that it fits exactly with what we would expect had it been written by fallible humans in about 1400BC using the knowledge available then, and edited/cobbled together by humans since then. It doesn't at all look as if it was dictated by an omnipotent and omniscient God.
There of course also needs to be a God in the first place. When we've asked for evidence of a God, the evidence so far has been miracles performed at faith healing events. But, this evidence is easily explained with other hypotheses, such as deception and the psychology of crowds, and we note the lack of verified evidence of the claimed miracles.
Given how in threads on DNA you dismiss strong objective evidence without understanding, it doesn't look as if you have earned the right to any faith in your pronouncements on creation versus evolution. Before you can comment, you must understand. Where have you shown that you understand?
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
No, it is a matter of God dwelling in man when He is asked and proving the living daylights out of it. It is a matter of the death and life and Resurrection of Christ that was observed. It is a matter of all history being pregnant with fulfilled prophesy.
Well done Watson.
Daydreaming.
Upvote
0
You have just admitted that the actual past is a same state past since the evidence is consistent with a same state past.
Upvote
0
You will notice that I will say that I wrote it instead of God.
When man writes something, it isn't the word of God.
"No it is an appeal to faith in man over God's word."--dad
You are a man. You are asking me to accept what you say on faith.
Scripture was written by men. Using scripture is an appeal to faith in man.
Upvote
0
So what has God been 'proving the living daylights out of it' and how does it prove anything?
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Got that right, and it is easy to check. We can compare it to God's word.
No. I am asking you not to make stuff up, and claim things based on an unproven state in the past. This you do.
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
I have all the evidence you do, so I we need to do is let your claims of evidence stand alone, divested of your belief system.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
