Your blatant "caucasians have contributed but no one else has" attitude is noted
The one you imagined in your hysteria.
Lyricx was the one who started with the 'us' and 'them' attitude if you were paying attention.
He said 'non-whites have no reason to like us'.
I said how about all of the things 'we' have done for them - surely they can't hate whites
so much when you consider all of the contributions that have been made to the world by
people who were white? Anyone can come on a computer and say that whites are the most
evil people in the world and they should all be exterminated but they have their
computer, internet, and the right to say that all thanks to people who were white.
Of course, I never said, or implied, that there have been
no contributors to the world/civilisaiton/whatever who weren't white.
You see, I have no problem with you listing the contributions of non-whites, though
it is a mystery to me why you would do that. My best guess is, you assume immediatley
when you see someone talking about the contributions of 'caucasians' or whatever
the hell it is you want to call them, that they are
white supremacists trying to imply that whites have made the only meaningful
contributions to humanity. Well, that is a very prejudiced and biased veiw that
is obviously shared by the rest of the posters in this thread.
It is the only explanation that I can see because, as soon as I started to talk about the
contributions made by people who were caucasian, you ignored the context and started
to behave as if I was saying that whites were superior and the only contributors when
I have not even vaguely implied this in any words. So once again, I have no disagreement
with you talking about the contributions of non-'caucasians' or whatever. However,
if in the course of doing so you list contributions that were made by 'caucasians',
like the persians, then I'm going to say something.
Cmon, say it.
Come on out and say it "All the credit was given to einstein when caucasians already knew about it".
Now why would I say that when einstein was caucasian?
Arab" is to widespread a word to denote any comment here, except that it is a word often wrongly used by racists when referring to those of Islamic faith and Middle eastern background
That's not true at all. The term 'arab' refers to saudis, yemenese, iraqis, jordanians,
palestinians, syrians, egyptians, and libyans. It has nothing to do with racism at all
and ALL of these people identify themselves as arabs
that is why they are reffered
to as such in the first place. The reason why they have this 'arab identity'
is because of the dominance of arabic culture in the middle east with the advent
and conquest of islam from saudi arabia, non-arabian semitic people of the middle
east began to identify themselves as arabs. And yes,
the muslims that you claim preserved the sciences during the
european dark ages were 'arabs' under this definition.
Actually, the modern system of democracy, is exclusivey athenian and exclusivley derived
from the athenian concept. Democracy is a system and ideology with specific criteria, which was
conceived in athens and no where else.
Yeah, avestan is an INDO EUROPEAN language
Good try to catch me in a lame trap
That's preciesly what I was trying to say.
Avestan and is an indo-european language and thus related to not only latin and greek
but the celtic, germanic, baltic and slavic languages. No 'lame trap' other then in,
once again, your own wild imagination.
Really?
Care to actually guarantee that absolute assertion?
You must know very little about australian geography, flaura and fauna, and
the history of the aborigines, if you think that they would have progressed significantly
beyond the stone age without outside influence.
But you seem to be saying that they have made the only meaningful contributions to the world and by saying such, state that caucasians have some inherent "superior" ability to do such
That is complete and utter crap. As I've
already pointed out by now, all I did was list the contributions of caucasians,
such as running water, eletricity, transport, etc, to show that we can be
appreciated. Unfortunatley, but not suprisingly, hysterics followed.
When any non-white talks about the contributions of their people,
no one ever accuses them of trying to say that their people are superior
or have made the only meaningful contributions!
But of course it's such a hate crime for someone like me to defend themself again a
comment like
'why shouldn't non-whites hate us'. All I did was list a handful of contributions that
have been made by people who were caucasian, and you obviously feel that only these contributions are meaningful.
I'm sure that your evidence for the Caucasian Theory of Relativity comes from the same place as your information on the small volume of the African skull.
Will you PLEASE give me a SMALL break. Where have I EVER said ANYTHING about the smaller volume of the african skull?
Why don't you just quote me on that - oh yeh I forgot.
You can't because once again, you are lying. Saint arunma,
need I remind you that lying is a sin? just like judging others.
