Ana the Ist
Aggressively serene!
- Feb 21, 2012
- 39,990
- 12,573
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Thanks.
It looks like this article is criticizing the Implicit Association Test in particular. It's possible that the IAT isn't a good measure, and should be discarded in favor of some other measure.
It would be more troubling to me to see studies in which, say,
professors discovered that they were calling on students in category A twice as often as students in category B, and then the professors tried to correct their behavior, but were unable to correct it no matter what. This article doesn't seem to be addressing that kind of situation.
If you're referring to the study in the OP, you're looking at it wrong. 7-12% is a marginal difference. Imagine you asked me 100 questions one year and I only answered 7....then you asked me 100 questions the next year and I answered a whopping 12 lol. Do you think your reaction would be....
A. Wow! He answered almost twice as many questions the second year!
Or
B. Wow...no matter what I do, this guy ignores around 90% of my questions.
I mean 2 is double the size of 1...but out of 100...nobody would care or likely even notice. There's a reason this study is grasping at the straws of a tiny statistical difference.
Upvote
0