Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I would like to say again that quizzes aren't meant to be an exact science. You provide the answer that you learn the most towards.
Quiz: Are you Calvinist or Arminian?
This is a short quiz to see if you are Calvinist or Arminian. While the average person seems to have a natural revulsion to Calvinism, you might be a Calvinist without even realizing it.
Calvinism is not something to be afraid of. The more I learn about the doctrines of grace, the more thankful I am to God for calling me, and the more I want to live in a way that pleases Him, no matter what suffering I might endure in life.
By the way, "Calvinism" is just a convenient term for a set of beliefs regarding God's election that were common among early reformers. Martin Luther and John Calvin were largely in agreement.
While the following might sound Calvinistic, it's actually from Martin Luther's 97 Theses, which were written before his famous 95 Theses:
In case you aren't sure about exactly what the basic teachings of Calvinism are, and how they find support in the Bible:
The Five Points of Calvinism: Defined, Defended, and Documented by David N. Steele
Similarly. I tried a few of the questions, but the wording of them was often giving me a binary choice between alternatives neither of which accurately expressed anything like my own understanding.
I honestly do not know enough about the Bible to say whether I am Calvinist or Arminian.
I might take an online quiz that says I'm a Calvinist, but that might be due to an ignorance of scripture.
I just took the quiz again and it says I am an Arminian, but I really don't know. It doesn't matter to our salvation whether we are Arminian or Calvinist.
However, the simplified version of this question, is basically, do we humans have the free will to enable us to willingly and of our own volition believe in Christ, or does God foreordain us to salvation or damnation? And there is scriptural support for both of those.
1 Peter 1:1–2
Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ,
To the pilgrims of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ:
Grace to you and peace be multiplied.
Romans 8:29
For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.
These passages seem to support the Arminian view, that we are predestined unto faith based on God's foreknowledge that we would choose to believe:
and the phrase consensus Patrum was even invented by Reformed theologians!
However, the simplified version of this question, is basically, do we humans have the free will to enable us to willingly and of our own volition believe in Christ, or does God foreordain us to salvation or damnation? And there is scriptural support for both of those.
I noticed the first question says whether "man is free from Satan, but can choose to sin," I believe that's more Semi-Pelagian than Arminian.
I got Calvinist, btw.
It should have been
Arminian: Do we as humans have a loving God that has sovereignly chosen to supernaturally "draw ALL mankind" unto Himself - where that drawing of God fully enables the free will (choice) to accept the Gospel even for the unregenerate person - or do we not have such a God according to the Bible?
Does the Romans 10:9-10 process work without first arbitrarily selecting someone to be born-again or is the sequence of Romans 10:9-10 correct as it is stated?
Rom 10:
9... if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; 10 for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation.
Is there in your view - no such thing as a born again person who knows what the Bible says about salvation -- but is not saved, not a believer, has not decided to accept the Gospel?
Does God actually "so love the WORLD that He gave.. or is it just "few of Matt 7" that God loved?
Is it the "whole World" in 1 John 2:2 or just the select few of Matt 7 that have the benefit of Christ's atoning sacrifice made available to them if they so choose?
1 John 2:2 He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.
I Jesus "the savior of the world" 1 John 4:4 in your view or just the savior of an arbitrarily elect "few" in Matt 7.
Are the "few" in Matt 7 just a "selected few" or those who select themselves by choosing not only to hear Christ's Words but also to act in obedience --- "according to the text"?
=========================
OR is Calvinism correct such that God is sovereign in a way that does not allow some choice by the lost sinner to have any part in determining the outcome?
Traditionally, Arminians and Calvinists agree on total depravity. The main difference between Calvinism and Arminianism is whether election is conditional or unconditional.
Quiz: Are you Calvinist or Arminian?
This is a short quiz to see if you are Calvinist or Arminian. While the average person seems to have a natural revulsion to Calvinism, you might be a Calvinist without even realizing it.
Calvinism is not something to be afraid of. The more I learn about the doctrines of grace, the more thankful I am to God for calling me, and the more I want to live in a way that pleases Him, no matter what suffering I might endure in life.
By the way, "Calvinism" is just a convenient term for a set of beliefs regarding God's election that were common among early reformers. Martin Luther and John Calvin were largely in agreement.
While the following might sound Calvinistic, it's actually from Martin Luther's 97 Theses, which were written before his famous 95 Theses:
In case you aren't sure about exactly what the basic teachings of Calvinism are, and how they find support in the Bible:
The Five Points of Calvinism: Defined, Defended, and Documented by David N. Steele
Semi-Pelagian here.
I think rather the main difference is that what we call “Calvinism” is really Determinism, in that we have no free will, and our election is thus in a sense unconditional, but also, foreordained by God, and what we call “Arminianism” is Non-Determinist, in that we have free will, so election is deterministic.
But your post hints at another element, the fact that classical Arminians and Calvinists both believe in Total Depravity. if you actually look at the Arminian church in the Netherlands, you will see there is more to Arminianism than is commonly believed or understood. I think it is much better to refer to the non-Calvinist soteriology of the Orthodox, the Seventh Day Adventists, the Evangelicals, the Roman Catholics, the Lutherans, the Moravians, the non-Calvinist Baptists, and most of the Methodists (specifically the soteriology of John Wesley as opposed to some of his Calvinist Methodist counterparts such as George Whitefield and Lady Moody), as simply Free Will Soteriology, or Non-Determinism, and for that matter, to refer to the “Calvinist” Soteriology of Reformed churches, Presbyterians, many Baptist churches, Fundamentalist Christians, some Anglicans, the majority of Congregationalists, and others, as Determinism.
Because, basically, that is what it boils down to. There is much more to Calvinism than the Determinist soteriology, and there is much more to Arminianism than the Non-Determinist soteriology.
For example, in my experience, most Methodists subscribe to Non-Determinist soteriology, but have an interpretation of the Eucharist which aligns with that of John Calvin.
So I really wish we would use the broader terminology of Determinism vs. Non-Determinism in order to avoid snagging ourselves on denominational specifics. Because, for example, in the case of “Calvinist Baptist” churches, and in the theology of prominent Baptist theologians of that orientation, such as Dr. Al Mohler, whom I regard with considerable admiration even though I do not agree with him on every issue of theology, there is actually relatively little in the beliefs and practices of these Baptist churches that is Calvinist per se, other than their shared belief in Determinism. When it comes to their views on sacramental theology, baptism, particularly infant baptism, the Eucharist, liturgics, Mariology, ecclesiology, and many other issues, the theology of John Calvin is vastly different than the theology of Al Mohler.
Despite being a Calvinist myself, I feel like I have more in common with Evangelicals and Baptists theologically and culturally than I do with the Reformed.
I don't know how important it is to be logically consistent. Couldn't determinism and free will both be true?
Like, we have libertarian free will, but God has ordained all things. It may seem contradictory, but perhaps our minds are too limited to reconcile the two?
There's also the oft overlooked Molinism, which I don't know if I agree with, but think is still worth considering.
I am not going to debate Calvin’s view of limited atonement. Instead, I’d like to point out what I find most fascinating about Calvin on this subject: his willingness to speak in ways that the Bible itself speaks when it comes to these matters.
Take this Trinitarian prayer for example:
We offer up our prayers unto Thee, O most gracious God and most merciful Father, for all men in general, that as Thou art pleased to be acknowledged the Savior of the whole human race by the redemption accomplished by Jesus Christ Thy Son…
Or consider his thoughts on the pardoned thief:
Our Lord made effective for the thief his death and passion which he suffered and endured for all mankind.
Or his thoughts on Christ’s suffering:
Indeed, our Lord Jesus was offered to all the world… Our Lord Jesus suffered for all and there is neither great nor small who is not inexcusable today, for we can obtain salvation in him.
Why Calvin is More Biblical Than Some Calvinists
In your view does God "ordain a man to take God's name in vain" or does he simply "foreknow it"?
IF taking God's name in vain were ordained by God - why would we be told to repent of that which God ordains?
Or do you use the term "ordain" to mean "God foresaw it and then sovereignly decided not to stop it"?
As in "He came to His OWN and His OWN received Him not" John 1:11
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?