Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
that includes me
, nicest thing anyone has said to me all day.
I agree with that 100%, this is the only other place on Christian forums, other than OBOB, where I do not feel like I am being attacked, I like all of you very much. I like what this sub forum stands for, objective truth and trust in the Bible, a traditional understaning of God and Christ and traditional moral values.This is the one place other than my own OBOB forum that I can come to without fearing that my faith "ID" is going to interfere, at least thats what I thought!!!
This statement has really stuck with me. If you don't mind, I'd really like to know what you consider to be the difference between key Christian principles and doctrine. Thanks.I was able to come together on key christian principles with others without letting "doctrine" get in the way![]()
even though the question was not adressed to me, could I please answer it, because I think I know where she is coming from?This statement has really stuck with me. If you don't mind, I'd really like to know what you consider to be the difference between key Christian principles and doctrine. Thanks.
To me, as a Catholic Christian, we have doctrines and dogmas that othe non-apostolic faiths don't have...ie...., real presence,perpetual virginity, etc....... these are part of my core faith.....I've even debated with a few here in GT....and we don't agree...............but thats okay......I can still respect and admire other Christians, I can still get along and work with other Christian who uphold key Christian principles and values....to me this is most imprortant......the Pro-life stance, protecting our churches from those who would try to change our stances on homosexuality, priesthood, pastorhood, these and so many more are things that we can and should work together on.........This statement has really stuck with me. If you don't mind, I'd really like to know what you consider to be the difference between key Christian principles and doctrine. Thanks.
desmalia
even though the question was not adressed to me, could I please answer it, because I think I know where she is coming from?
We all agree on the Divinity of Christ and the Bible and morality but as Catholics we also believe in the apostolic authority of the Bishops and that the Pope is the first among the Bishops and prayer to the saints, I really like CC because we have not been hassled about out beliefs and have been excepted as brothers and sisters in Christ
there is false, worldly, comprimising ecumenism. However, there is also the true.I don't believe that "ecumenism" is a characteristic that is much valued by conservative Christians. I'm positive that it's not included in the Conservative Christian Wiki. Otherwise I would NEVER EVER have joined. You must be thinking of the newer more liberal evangelical churches like those led by Joel Osteen and Rick Warren.
Seriously, ecumenism is not "getting along" but rather blurring doctrine so we can all be one. Very different concepts.
Maybe I will accused of having an agenda by making this statement but I can safely say that this division was due for a while. In it's foundation two groups of inviduals formulated CC. One were the individuals who wanted a "peaceful environment" and wanted nothing but fellowship. My assumption is that they want to wtiness by grace but in doing so they refuse to accept the liberal agenda which has long been infultrate with deception still using biblical termionology but it having different meaning. The other was a group not willling compromise the Gospel for the CF agenda fo relativism and "unity." As many of you know I have always been part of the latter. My issue with peace and unity with the liberals is their intent. It's more than clear to me that they are familar with the truth. This isn't about ignorance but about setting another agenda in this forum which has already perverted CF as a whole.
This statement has really stuck with me. If you don't mind, I'd really like to know what you consider to be the difference between key Christian principles and doctrine. Thanks.
Thank you. That does help me understand the post a little better.desmalia
even though the question was not adressed to me, could I please answer it, because I think I know where she is coming from?
We all agree on the Divinity of Christ and the Bible and morality but as Catholics we also believe in the apostolic authority of the Bishops and that the Pope is the first among the Bishops and prayer to the saints, I really like CC because we have not been hassled about out beliefs and have been excepted as brothers and sisters in Christ
Excellent post, thanks!To me, as a Catholic Christian, we have doctrines and dogmas that othe non-apostolic faiths don't have...ie...., real presence,perpetual virginity, etc....... these are part of my core faith.....I've even debated with a few here in GT....and we don't agree...............but thats okay......I can still respect and admire other Christians, I can still get along and work with other Christian who uphold key Christian principles and values....to me this is most imprortant......the Pro-life stance, protecting our churches from those who would try to change our stances on homosexuality, priesthood, pastorhood, these and so many more are things that we can and should work together on.........
My view, personally, I think everone should be Catholic.....but I would never force or belittle someone to force them to my way of thinking......that's not Christian at all..........it comes from the heart.........but this isn't about individual faith practices......from what I'm gathering here since i've been away........it's more about conservative stances being threatened by liberal ones.......and why should we have to "give up" what we are to appease those who want to disrupt or even hide behind the screen of "lets all be nice and pretend that we aren't trying to change you and make you accept us"....funny, but this WAS a place of acceptance of ALL different Chrisitan faiths that are conservative.......liberals have their fourm, fundys had theirs........why, oh why is this now the target for change...........maybe its the traffic....we have a lot here compared to the other.......boredom maybe????
IDK...........but I do know, from what I've read,that some peoples words and actions........well, the aren't very Christian..then when you bring it up to sort it out like an adult.........well now they want silence......."don't bring it up" don't do this, don't do that...........it's ridiculous and immature..........let the truth be known, air the dirty laundry and be done with it.........as Christians, suck it up and if you've done something wrong, repent, be ashamed......and don't do it again.......but don't try to hide, cover it up or pretend that it didn't happen, doesn't exist. etc.......
See, I went off and went random on you......
Key Christian principles........we should be able to act like adults who hold to believe in God, respect our brethren without prejudice, even when we disagree in theology!
Thank you. That does help me understand the post a little better.
Excellent post, thanks!
Your opinion about what CC should be is absolutely correct, IMHO. No one should have to muzzle or give up what they believe to be here. It's a matter of basic respect.
This forum has not become fundamentalist vs. Catholic (and I'm glad you feel that way too). If anything, when we've seen such an accusation leveled, it was quite possibly in a spirit of fear, not love. But we should be fully capable of disagreeing on these things without trying to annihilate each other.
We each have our own "home forum" but shouldn't need to be banished to them because we disagree on things. I feel the same kind of thing as you, in that I would love to see believers become more "fundamentalist". But while that is my desire, the word "militant" in our wiki statement (that has been so criticized here) has absolutely nothing to do with trying to brow beat or force people to believe as we do. I agree that we should be free to debate and discuss the issues respectfully. As soon as it becomes a reactionary personal vendetta, neither light nor love are being expressed, and satan wins. It has been suggested that the fundamentalists are trying to force the Catholics out of here. I'm glad to read that this is not how you actually feel. I am also glad to verify that Catholics are not trying to force the fundamentalists out either.
We've got people here on the attack on behalf of one supposed group or another. But it doesn't seem the individual members that make up that group necessarily feel the need to have someone "champion their cause", especially because it becomes so childish, as you mentioned. (And I fully admit my sin in this as when I saw fundamentalists being attacked, I jumped in to represent them, which accomplished absolutely nothing.)
There are some real issues here, I agree with you on that. Liberal is a word we can use to describe them, undoubtedly, but you know I think at its core it's much darker than simply that.
I am encouraged that you and I, though coming from very different viewpoints, can discuss this respectfully.![]()