- Aug 27, 2014
- 13,565
- 13,723
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Private
NB: I'm posting this here because I think it may lead to debate. I don't necessarily want one.
In another thread that is now locked, a user who is a guest to the EO forum basically accused the EO Church of trading canonical recognition of breakaway EO bodies for 'donation' money. I don't believe there's any truth to that accusation, but it did get me wondering: would this fall under the definition of simony, and be treated as such according to whatever canons govern the EO Church with regard to that corruption? From my admittedly weak understanding, simony involves the selling of positions within the Church (e.g., ordination to the priesthood), but I have never heard of it being extended to wholesale recognition of an entire group as being the Church/within the Church. You'd think if that were possible, then the newly-minted Ukrainian Church would've tried that, or the Macedonian Orthodox Church, or whoever else may be out there and seeking recognition as the legitimate EO Church of a given territory.
So it's a bit weird. Has there ever been anything like that in the history of the Chalcedonian Orthodox churches, and if so, how as it dealt with? Thanks for any input. I'm just curious, not really looking to argue.
In another thread that is now locked, a user who is a guest to the EO forum basically accused the EO Church of trading canonical recognition of breakaway EO bodies for 'donation' money. I don't believe there's any truth to that accusation, but it did get me wondering: would this fall under the definition of simony, and be treated as such according to whatever canons govern the EO Church with regard to that corruption? From my admittedly weak understanding, simony involves the selling of positions within the Church (e.g., ordination to the priesthood), but I have never heard of it being extended to wholesale recognition of an entire group as being the Church/within the Church. You'd think if that were possible, then the newly-minted Ukrainian Church would've tried that, or the Macedonian Orthodox Church, or whoever else may be out there and seeking recognition as the legitimate EO Church of a given territory.
So it's a bit weird. Has there ever been anything like that in the history of the Chalcedonian Orthodox churches, and if so, how as it dealt with? Thanks for any input. I'm just curious, not really looking to argue.