I watched it now. Pretty much the usual presentation of the 70 weeks, which I said several times now I accept.
It referenced the 2,300 days for a moment but did not elaborate. I do not agree with the Adventist interpretation of the 2,300 days.
But you were an SDA once, what now is your interpretation of both the 70 week and 1260 day prophecies?
I am looking for a timeline that illustrates other views of Daniels prophecies...remembering these also include the corresponding passages in Revelation.
Could I also make a seemingly offtopic statement...i wonder how many people here realise that of all the books missing from Codex Sinaiticus, the entire book of Daniel is not in that manuscript online! (how bizarre) I find this an incredible coincidence considering the location of the book of Daniel in the Bible...it does not surely seem like a random activity at the hands of an unknowing monk to rip that entire book out of the manuscript for fire starting material surely.
Also, some may find it almost impossible to also read, the book of Revelation in Sinaiticus is of such corrupted poor quality, it is unreliable as a witness for this important book of the Bible written by apostle John!
What is even more coincidentally suspicious...that this manuscript was first found by Ticshendorf in 1844!
What are the chances a long lost manuscript, the oldest of the known Bible, is found in 1844 with the entire book of Daniel missing...the very book that the founders of the SDA movement developed the IJ Doctrine from after the great disappointment of the same year!
May i also add an edit here after reading what Mrs White had to say about this subject...
in the type [earthly sanctuary] no sin could be confessed and conveyed into the sanctuary after the high priest entered the Most Holy. Lev. 4:1-7; 16:17,23,24. So if this was a type of the entrance of Christ into the Most Holy in heaven in 1844, then truly the door of mercy did close there, and all sinners since are lost"
So here is a problem for the opposing view to current SDA IJ... If Christ the High Priest entered the Most Holy place immediately after his ascension, how does one resolve Mrs. Whites claim above, is one therefore back where the Millerite movement were in Oct 1844?
Lets also add to this dilemma, Rev 8:1-5. If there are not 2 compartments in heaven, or indeed if the Holy place is this earth, how can the angel in Rev 8 possibly be standing at the altar of incense?
Berean Study Bible Par ▾
1When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour. 2And I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and they were given seven trumpets.3Then another angel, who had a golden censer, came and stood at the altar. He was given much incense to offer, along with the prayers of all the saints, on the golden altar before the throne. 4And the smoke of the incense, together with the prayers of the saints, rose up before God from the hand of the angel.5Then the angel took the censer, filled it with fire from the altar, and hurled it to the earth; and there were peals of thunder, and rumblings, and flashes of lightning, and an earthquake.
My understanding is that the High Priest must be in the Holy Place to offer intercessory prayers for Gods people
I also note Des Ford includes the following quote from Ballenger in his paper...which is a complete misrepresentation of the entire plan of salvation as it appears to claim Jesus only died for the sins of the living at the time and not for all time!
We teach that no sins are pardoned except those that go into the sanctuary by the priestly work, and yet we have the sanctuary closed to the patriarchs for four thousand years, and that Christ began the work of carrying sins into the heavenly sanctuary at his ascension.- This leaves four thousand years without any priest by which the sin was carried into the sanctuary.