What's the point of evangalizing if there are some born with no chance at salvation?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A few thoughts:Bulldog said:What's the point of evangalizing if there are some born with no chance at salvation?
God would use a different means (since it's a hypothetical, he could talk directly to their minds, write messages in clouds, spell out the gospel story by aligning rocks on mars for our rover to take pictures of, drop bibles out of the sky, etc...). The methods God uses to accomplish His will are not logically necessary, just what He chooses to use. As such, He can freely choose to do it a different way if He wants to.PatrickM said:Hypothetically, what if every Christian decided NOT to evangalize, disobeying God, etc.? How would the "elect", then, receive Christ?
Just a thought was there not a OT person whom tried some thing like this and he concluded he could not keep his mouth shut.PatrickM said:Follow-up question (with OPs permission, of course?):
Hypothetically, what if every Christian decided NOT to evangalize, disobeying God, etc.? How would the "elect", then, receive Christ?
PatrickM said:Follow-up question (with OPs permission, of course?):
Hypothetically, what if every Christian decided NOT to evangalize, disobeying God, etc.? How would the "elect", then, receive Christ?
These alternatives all seem much more effective than using fallible humans, so why then, doesn't God do just that?II Paradox II said:God would use a different means (since it's a hypothetical, he could talk directly to their minds, write messages in clouds, spell out the gospel story by aligning rocks on mars for our rover to take pictures of, drop bibles out of the sky, etc...). The methods God uses to accomplish His will are not logically necessary, just what He chooses to use. As such, He can freely choose to do it a different way if He wants to.
ken
PatrickM said:These alternatives all seem much more effective than using fallible humans, so why then, doesn't God do just that?
Could it be that by allowing us to choose to obey Him, He chooses to bless those whose feet carry the good news of the gospel of peace?
what a great testimony of God's great love, mercy, and grace for us. Thanks for sharing. It touched me.kickingsacredcows said:I'd like to jump in here and give my personal experience along these lines.
I was a hateful, Christian persecuting teenager who happened to have a believing sister. She would once in a while ask me to go to her youth group with her, and I would always become violently angry with her, to the point of one time lifting her off the floor by her throat and telling her if she ever mentioned God to me again I would kill her. She never said another word to me about Him again.
My fear of all things having to do with God was amazing and horrible at the same time. When I found myself at an occasional funeral or wedding I would break into a sweat at the mention of Jesus. I hated God, I hated anyone who talked of God, and I never stopped to ask myself why. I only knew that I had to flee or lash out at the mention of Him.
One day when I was 18 I went into my sister's bedroom to get a record I had loaned her and on the way out, while passing her dresser, my eyes fell on her bible. At that moment I was COMPELLED to pick it up. I remember wondering what that THING was doing in my hands and as I found myself laying on my bed reading about this Jesus whom I had blasphemed and hated, I began to believe.
Our loving heavenly father can, and apparently sometimes will directly compel someone to believe, as He did so graciously with me.
I can only assume that He has dealt with others similarly.
Thanks for bearing with a story that arguably belongs in a personal testimony thread.
kickingsacredcows said:I'd like to jump in here and give my personal experience along these lines.
I was a hateful, Christian persecuting teenager who happened to have a believing sister. She would once in a while ask me to go to her youth group with her, and I would always become violently angry with her, to the point of one time lifting her off the floor by her throat and telling her if she ever mentioned God to me again I would kill her. She never said another word to me about Him again.
My fear of all things having to do with God was amazing and horrible at the same time. When I found myself at an occasional funeral or wedding I would break into a sweat at the mention of Jesus. I hated God, I hated anyone who talked of God, and I never stopped to ask myself why. I only knew that I had to flee or lash out at the mention of Him.
One day when I was 18 I went into my sister's bedroom to get a record I had loaned her and on the way out, while passing her dresser, my eyes fell on her bible. At that moment I was COMPELLED to pick it up. I remember wondering what that THING was doing in my hands and as I found myself laying on my bed reading about this Jesus whom I had blasphemed and hated, I began to believe.
Our loving heavenly father can, and apparently sometimes will directly compel someone to believe, as He did so graciously with me.
I can only assume that He has dealt with others similarly.
Thanks for bearing with a story that arguably belongs in a personal testimony thread.
thanx..Reformationist said:II Paradox II, thank you, once again, for your biblically sound witness.
Because He chooses not to for some reason. We are only given general outlines of why He chooses to do so. God does not always use the most efficient method. For example, we all think God is omnipotent, thus He can do anything he wants, when he wants. However, he created a host of angels that he uses to watch over His creation and act as messengers and smite various people (and bless them sometimes too). Clearly, an omnipotent being does not need to have an angel smite his enemies, he can do it just by the same breath of His mouth He created the world with. However, He chooses to use what is obviously a far less efficient method to accomplish these tasks, His angels.These alternatives all seem much more effective than using fallible humans, so why then, doesn't God do just that?
Sure. I don't deny that God allows us to obey or disobey. As the Westminster confession states, the efficacy of secondary causes (me) is not destroyed by God's sovereignty, but established by it.Could it be that by allowing us to choose to obey Him, He chooses to bless those whose feet carry the good news of the gospel of peace?
Amen to that. Sorry if I've appeared to become, well, "you know who's" advocate. (Insert puns here!)II Paradox II said:Sure. I don't deny that God allows us to obey or disobey. As the Westminster confession states, the efficacy of secondary causes (me) is not destroyed by God's sovereignty, but established by it.
ken
no problem...PatrickM said:Amen to that. Sorry if I've appeared to become, well, "you know who's" advocate. (Insert puns here!)
foreknown said:I am thankful for God's word by I am more thankful that he predestined me to eternal life before the foundation of the earth.