Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They've got a Jewish fullback I'm gonna need Martin Luther on defensive tackle!This is starting to sound like draft picks
Started reading his Wikipedia entry and saw this:There is another choice other than Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox. George Fox and the early Quakers, though nothing like what passes today as Quakerism, were against Protestantism, and sola scripture, and strongly against Catholicism with its hierachy. They believed that scripture is secondary to the revelation from the Holy Spirit, of course always confirmed by scripture but in that order.
I recommend you read Fox's Journal as he wandered the land looking for answers to similar questions to the ones you have, and what was revealed to him about organised religion and 'steeple houses'. The drawback is finding anything likewise in the flesh.
There is a link with the Nazarene church over the doctrine of entire sanctification which they used to espouse which like most other truth has gone down the pan.
We actually had a couple ducklings hatch a week ago!Quack.
We actually had a couple ducklings hatch a week ago!
What kind(s) of poultry?Started reading his Wikipedia entry and saw this:
"Toward the end of his life he wrote a letter for general circulation pointing out that Abel, Noah, Abraham, Jacob, Moses and David were all keepers of sheep or cattle and therefore that a learned education should not be seen as a necessary qualification for ministry."
It's funny considering I raise poultry.
Open minded, but not so open that their brain falls out.Thanks for your reply and the linked videos. I'll make sure to check those out.
I'm curious as to what you mean by more progressive in theology?
Turns out that's only human, and present in all churches, as best I can tell. I can't tell you how many endless disputes I read about in the modern Catholic church for instance, but I don't put special emphasis on their fractiousness. They are only human, just like any other people. It's not like they are worse than other churches. Rather, the same, in that way. Certainly better than many though, since they do have a good big-tent aim which many of them adhere to even while others are so partisan against others in their own church you want to grab them by the lapel and ask them what are they thinking, even though you aren't even in that particular church. The same goes for every church really. But, back to the big tent tendency -- it's a very good thing, and many large churches have it.While I've developed severe doubts about the ability of Protestantism to maintain long-term social & theological stability and to avoid fractiousness
I was raised Nazarene but I think I'm completely convinced at this point that I can't be Protestant. Now I just have to figure whether I should be Catholic or Eastern Orthodox. I really struggle, as many do, with the current corruption of the Church & the Papacy. I understand that it was the result of an agenda of infiltration & subversion, but I'm struggling to understand the doctrine of the infallibility of the Church and how it could have even been corrupted in the first place if it truly possessed the singular legitimacy in the way (I think) they claim it does. I can easily get around the fact that humans & our institutions are inherently flawed, but the way Catholics argue for the singular legitimacy of their Church seems to imply that such corruption shouldn't have been possible if they were correct.
I'm also still confused about the way they treat Mary, but that's much less serious a hangup than the aforementioned.
Any input is appreciated. I want to get cleared up on this before proceeding to examine the doctrinal differences between Catholicism & Orthodoxy.
Thank you.
That's worth mentioning.There still is a third option, the Church that gave the world monasticism, the Oriental Orthodox. If you live near a big city, chances are good there is a Coptic Church in your area.
The Voice In The Desert - Oriental Orthodox
If I'm recognizing him, I think the video you posted is of one of my favorite teachers.
Oh okay, that's what I figured but I wanted to make sure it wasn't bitterness or something, as others have pointed out. It's always a bad idea to make a major change when you're acting only on temporary emotions.If I understand correctly, it's their hermeneutics that I disagree with, as well as Sola Scriptura.
I agree. D. L. Moody.Started reading his Wikipedia entry and saw this:
"Toward the end of his life he wrote a letter for general circulation pointing out that Abel, Noah, Abraham, Jacob, Moses and David were all keepers of sheep or cattle and therefore that a learned education should not be seen as a necessary qualification for ministry."
It's funny considering I raise poultry.
What kind(s) of poultry?
Poultry in motion ....We actually had a couple ducklings hatch a week ago!
Sorry - Quakers are definitely protestant.There is another choice other than Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox. George Fox and the early Quakers,