Yah, yah, we just call them "races". Doesn't make your claims any more valid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(biology)
"In biological taxonomy,
race (Latin:
prōles, stirps[1]) is an informal rank in the taxonomic hierarchy, below the level of subspecies; the term is recognized by some, but is no longer governed by any of the formal codes of biological nomenclature."
So race was initially instituted to show the division between different taxa within a species. So, is an Asian a different race or not from an African?
And we call the infraspecific taxa within domesticated species "breeds". We all understand the difference between the Husky and the Mastiff is no greater or less than the differences between Asian and African.
You know - what the "species" becomes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species
"Presence of specific locally adapted traits may further subdivide species into "infraspecific taxa" such as subspecies (and in botany other taxa are used, such as varieties, subvarieties, and formae)."
So if you wish to stop the designation at subspecies, we can do that too. As the Husky subspecies mates with the Mastiff Subspecies and produces the subspecies Chinook, so the Asian subspecies mates with the African subspecies and produces the Afro-Asian subspecies.
How you want to do this? What names do you want to use?
Didn't evolve at all, they were bred, just as a Husky when bred with a Mastiff Makes a Chinook. Please quit ignoring not only all of nature - but now also how reproduction works.
No, it means they came (the "First Americans" their wording) from Asia. Later another different infraspecific taxa migrated and began mating with the ones already there. Different because we understand that it is at that point - two separate classes of DNA were combined - not of the same population. On a further occasion another infraspecific taxa migrated over. We also know this because their DNA was also different. As for the pretty phrase "most anciently diverged" it means that the first one that migrated over was from the first infraspecific taxa from Western Asia. We know this because the Native Americans (specifically the Eskimo branch - even has a pretty subname if u want to look it up) migrated back and mixed with the Eastern infraspecific taxa.
At no time was the fantasy of evolving from one species to the next involved. In fact, without even realizing it you have revoked all claims to evolution - by insisting humans cannot ever become other than they are. By ignoring the very biological data that was your only claim to fame. When you say "modern Humans" does this include Neanderthal????
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_genome_project
"According to preliminary sequences, 99.7% of the base pairs of the modern human and Neanderthal genomes are identical, compared to humans sharing around 98.8% of base pairs with the chimpanzee. (Other studies concerning the commonality between chimps and humans have modified the commonality of 99% to a commonality of only 94%, showing that the genetic gap between humans and chimps is far larger than originally thought.)"
Yes it is, just imagine what a little .3 does in some peoples imaginations.
At least be a little more realistic in the artwork.