That's cool when everyone agrees. What about when we don't agree? Why should the minority explanation, which has absolutely zero evidential support, be considered preferable to the majority explanation which has gobs and gobs of support?
Suppose everyone agrees about the way things are.
And your memory agrees with theirs.
Are you going to doubt them? Does that make sense?
You know. Even if reality changed.
~
Faulty memory? Multiple experiments demonstrating that memory can be faulty.
Mandela Effect? A handful of people who cannot accept that memory can be faulty and rely on demonstrably faulty memory to make their argument.
Upvote
0