Quantum Immortality Test

[JohnEmmett]

Field of Dreams 1989

 

[Rachel20]

So that's back to the Mandella Effect. But a "glitch" in memory could also indicate a simulation where the coders got reckless. It doesn't require reincarnation, which suffers the same infinite regress problem as the idea of simulations within simulations within simulations. Ultimately, the "first" must be explained. If Q were right - and those were all gods we created, there still remains the question who created us? And if we have no need of a creator, why do they?

 

[JohnEmmett]

there still remains the question who created us?

difficult question

 

[Kylie]

your attitude is difficult

The only people who find it difficult when asked them for evidence are those who haven't got any.

 

[JohnEmmett]

The only people who find it difficult when asked them for evidence are those who haven't got any.

Mark 4:12

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

https://www.reddit.com/r/Retconned/

place to discuss the effect under the presupposition that for whatever reason, *it is really happening,* at the exclusion of the theory of Confabulation.

Fail.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Fail.

Does it fail you. Or do you fail it.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

I finished the article. Why would "dimensional jumping" require many worlds? If there are more dimensions in this one world than we can perceive, and we temporarily move into a higher one, and back again, it's not needed. I've heard just the addition of one more dimension (4th spatial) would give the ability for different matter to exist in the same space. Much like I described of my experience.

Sadly, spatial dimensions don't work like that, it's a comic-book trope, a plot device; spatial dimensions are simply orthogonal directions in space. Secondly, there is a plausible physical theory that includes extra spatial dimensions which might describe our universe; it's called String Theory - it has 11 dimensions, but the additional spatial dimensions are curled up so small they're impossible to access (called 'compactification'), and this feature is essential to the theory.

The scientifically possible multiverses don't help either, as their universes are mutually inaccessible.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Sadly, spatial dimensions don't work like that,

The scientifically possible multiverses don't help either, as their universes are mutually inaccessible.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47qbPGmMHsw&t=20351s

Bell Classics - Remote Viewing w/ Major Ed Dames

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

John de Lancie the actor? Interesting. I really like him & glad he's here too. But scripture is way out enough for me. Teleporting (Philip), being "like" Christ because we'll see him as he really is (higher dimensions), Christ appearing in the midst of a cube (room) without coming through any of it's sides, ... Reality is a curious thing.

Cool stories.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47qbPGmMHsw&t=20351s

Bell Classics - Remote Viewing w/ Major Ed Dames

Same old BS.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Same old BS.

…

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

So that's back to the Mandella Effect. But a "glitch" in memory could also indicate a simulation where the coders got reckless.

It could indicate that - it could indicate a virus affecting our brains, or cosmic rays damaging our brain cells... but we already know from many examples, in the lab and in real life, that these kinds of recall 'glitches' are common and characteristic of how memory works. Memories are reconstructions, they're not like video replays.

Here's some interesting reading:

Why I’m Skeptical of Eyewitnesses
The ‘Mandela Effect’ and How Your Mind is Playing Tricks on You
How Much of Your Memory is True?
Memory Distortion & Invention
False Autobiographical Memories
Seven Sins of Memory
The Memory Doctor
How accurate are Memories of 9/11?
Memory is Unreliable - and it could be worse
List of Memory Biases

 

[JohnEmmett]

but we already know from many examples,

you don't already know

learn from Socrates

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Mark 4:12

So people who have no idea what they are seeing or hearing are the most credible?

Lol

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

you don't already know

learn from Socrates

I have; have you read Socrates?

 

[JohnEmmett]

I have; have you read Socrates?

you know this is not happening


wiser, better to not know…

 

[JohnEmmett]

Lol

…

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

you know this is not happening

wiser, better to not know…

You can't answer a simple question. Meh.

 

[JohnEmmett]

You can't answer a simple question.

I myself know nothing, except just a little, enough to extract an argument from another man who is wise and to receive it fairly.
- Socrates