Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ugh…
"It has to be right because I believe it very strongly."
The difference between us is that my arguments are supportable.
You are arguing for the sake of arguing.
The difference between us is that my arguments are supportable.
Indeed - even the so-called 'flashbulb' memories of extraordinary events (e.g. 9/11), that produce a vivid snapshot-like memory, have been shown to be prone to inaccuracies.I'd rather have evidence.
As has so often been shown, memory - no matter how strong and vivid it is - can not be relied upon.
Seems legit. After a year 37% of people were in a timeline with a different version of 9/11. After 3 years 47% of us had changed timeline. That's a far better explanation than problems with memory.You may remember the past differently because it really was different.
Due to the Mandela Effect.
Straw man argument. Again.
You keep saying that, yet I have already asked you to show me even a single post of yours that does not boil down to this, and you seem incapable of doing so.
That's a far better explanation than problems with memory.
And you're credulous. So?
But you claim to? Why?
Not everyone can know.
Not everyone wants to know.
Logical fallacy.
With the strawman argument, someone attacks a position the opponent doesn’t really hold.
This fallacy can be unethical if it’s done on purpose, deliberately mischaracterizing the opponent’s position for the sake of deceiving others.
But you claim to? Why?
Evidence in support of faulty memory is, indeed, everywhere. So why do you claim to know that this evidence is bunk and the real explanation for every faulty memory is people changing timelines, something for which there is no evidence?
It is everywhere…
Evidence in support of faulty memory is, indeed, everywhere. So why do you claim to know that this evidence is bunk and the real explanation for every faulty memory is people changing timelines, something for which there is no evidence?
There is endless evidence. But you (and others) are endlessly unable (or unwilling) to appreciate, know this evidence. As it is.
Instead, you are endlessly debating it. Since it seems this is what you do regardless of what I say. Regardless of the evidence I share.
I suspect this is about levels of reality. And our ability (or inability) to be aware of the transcendental. This Effect is quite a test. And I cannot pass it for others.
You have not presented any evidence. Anecdotes and stories are not evidence.
There is endless evidence. But you (and others) are endlessly unable (or unwilling) to appreciate, know this evidence. As it is.
Instead, you are endlessly debating it. Since it seems this is what you do regardless of what I say. Regardless of the evidence I share.
I suspect this is about levels of reality. And our ability (or inability) to be aware of the transcendental. This Effect is quite a test. And I cannot pass it for others.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?