Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's not a denial of anything. It's an unwillingness to abandon a well-supported interpretation of the biblical account in favor of literalism. Once you take that position, no "explaining away" is required.
Can you show evidence that we had feathers. Shared genes do nothing unless all the genes line up. They don't, we don't have feathers and there is no evidence that we ever did. Similarities do not mean evolution is accurate. It shows there is a common design and that God used common designs in his creation.Then perhaps you can present a DNA analysis which demonstrates this?
We observe creatures sharing common ancestors. For example, siblings share the same parents and cousins share the same grandparents. We don't observe creatures being designed by some "creator" and we don't observe any kind of "creator" being. Science supports what we observe. We observe common ancestry occurring all the time. We never observe creation. Therefore science supports common ancestry and not creation.
Right. You have your own internally self-consistent view of it, with what you consider to be convincing apologetic support. So do I. The diifference is, I am willing to allow you yours, on the basis that we both seem to draw basically the same doctrine from our respective views.Yes it is. There is no well supported interpretation. There is no need for interpretation at all. It says what it says. The only need is to change what is written. The only need to interpret it differently is if it makes no sense like if it says God is a door or some obvious metaphore. If God said he did it in six days then there is no need to say he didn't. It is far more supported that the Genesis account is accurate.
Right. You have your own internally self-consistent view of it, with what you consider to be convincing apologetic support. So do I. The diifference is, I am willing to allow you yours, on the basis that we both seem to draw basically the same doctrine from our respective views.
We don't observe evolution from a common ancestor either but that doesn't stop you from from believing that.We observe creatures sharing common ancestors. For example, siblings share the same parents and cousins share the same grandparents. We don't observe creatures being designed by some "creator" and we don't observe any kind of "creator" being. Science supports what we observe. We observe common ancestry occurring all the time. We never observe creation. Therefore science supports common ancestry and not creation.
Oh good grief we are not talking about common ancestors of humans being humans. We are talking about common ancestors of ours being the spider. Big difference.
Oh good grief we are not talking about common ancestors of humans being humans. We are talking about common ancestors of ours being the spider. Big difference.
Likewise, I'm sure. But you know why I am on this forum--many of those who believe as you do about the Bible are not so charitable.I allow you yours as well. You are more than welcome to your belief no matter how wrong it is.
Are you a disinformation agent?
It’s true the first signs of civilization are dated around then; this is already known. It does not follow that because the earliest human remains found predate the earliest known civilization we did not evolve from a common ancestor with apes. That’s a complete non sequitur. Nonetheless, anotomically modern humans first showed up no later than 300,000 years ago.
An assumption based on nothing substantial.The answer is obvious - the same answer that there is for all creationists - prior commitment to accepting bible tales no matter what.
Don't get me started on what amazes me, pal.I am always amazed at how just about every creationist one encounters on an internet forum is the ultimate authority on every field of science there is, regardless of their actual background.
Sorry, but those sons of God were not humans.The sons of God were "Their" kind, the kind The Trinity created from water on the 5th Day, which was some 3.8 Billion years ago in man's time. Gen 1:21 Humans, were made some 10 Billion years BEFORE the last universal common ancestor appeared in the water of our Earth. Gen 2:4-7 Humans were made to live forever and had a Shekinah Glory or brightness like that of Jesus. Humans are "His" kind or the kind which Jesus made with His own Hands.
Humans (His kind) arrived on our Earth 11k years ago Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE and Noah's grandsons produced children with the descendants of the sons of God (prehistoric people) (Their kind). Gen 10:10 This fulfilled the prophecy of Gen 6:4 which tells us the SAME thing happened on Adam's Earth since Cain had NO other Humans to marry. The prophecy is found in the "and also after that".
Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God (prehistoric man) came in unto the daughters of men, (Heb-Adam) and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Sex is the only way to change one's intelligence. You either inherit the superior intelligence of Adam or you do NOT. The ToE is the biggest Satanic Lie ever forced upon innocent children. Such blasphemy is evidence that we are truly living in the last days before Jesus returns. Amen?
Ha, what? Due to the fact that the lineage of birds split from that of mammals before the trait of feathers existed, it would make absolutely no sense for humans to have genes specific to feather production.Can you show evidence that we had feathers. Shared genes do nothing unless all the genes line up.
Tell me who told you the theory of evolution suggested humans had ever had feathers. Tell me so I can smack them with a rotten tuna for acting as an authority on stuff they know nothing about.They don't, we don't have feathers and there is no evidence that we ever did. Similarities do not mean evolution is accurate. It shows there is a common design and that God used common designs in his creation.
Sorry, but those sons of God were not humans.
-_- fyi, Aman777 would agree with you on this... well, the idea that the "sons of god" aren't human, that is.Sorry, but those sons of God were not humans.
Why do you think God's people were sent to wipe out all the giants up until the last ones from Gad?
I have long since given up on refuting your "truth". I more seek to establish internal consistency within your bible interpretation, because a story that confuses itself is much, much harder to remember and tell other people about.No, I post God's Truth which is the Truth in every way and watch as atheists agnostics and phonies try to prove His Holy Word wrong. I've been watching for many years and you, nor any other person, has EVER refuted His Truth. Amen?
we pretty much see all living things (with very few exceptions) naturally occurring, yet none require an intelligent designer. Cars though, we've never seen them naturally occur. All examples have come about due to an intelligent designer and none have come about naturally. In fact, until we designed and built them, cars weren't even a thing.how many living things do we see naturally occuring?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?