Tu Es Petrus
Well-Known Member
Doesn't he have FAITH?...
Don't you have faith when you use your seatbelts? Are you afraid God won't protect you?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Doesn't he have FAITH?...
The more interesting question is why a Christian would need protection.He uses that glass for the same reason that we use seatbelts. The precaution is proportionate to the danger or threat.
For him to just go out without protection would be playing fast and loose with his life, and that would be a sin
I only wear a seatbelt because it is the Law here.Don't you have faith when you use your seatbelts? Are you afraid God won't protect you?
The more interesting question is why a Christian would need protection.
The more interesting question is why a Christian would need protection.
Do you think your Pope is the only Christian in danger of thatMaybe you had not considered that there are a billion screaming Muslims who hate Christians, and, if given the chance, would gladly blow us all to smithereens
Do you think your Pope is the only Christian in danger of that
But Christians don't go around in bullet-proof vehicles.Maybe you had not considered that there are a billion screaming Muslims who hate Christians, and, if given the chance, would gladly blow us all to smithereens
Maybe. Maybe it was a stunt. But 'popes' have kissed the Qur'an, criticised the liberation of Iraq, and made a lot of sympathetic noises to Muslims in recent years. So why the protection?In fact, it was a Muslim the shot John Paul II.
From what I have seen over the years, the Pope has brought a lot of the problems on himself, from both Muslims and Jews. And thus all Christianity is affected, not just the Pope and RCS. Whenever the Pope speaks, I actually cringe a lot of times at what he might say. But that is getting off topic I think........Did I say that? You have a knack for continually putting words in my mouth.
If you think you are in danger too, thats great: Go get yourself your own bullet proof car. I won't put you down for it the way you guys put down the pope.
The more interesting question is why a Christian would need protection.
But Christians don't go around in bullet-proof vehicles......
Don't forget, 'at least 500 other people killed'! Where does Ratzinger go where 500 people are killed?
Why would a Christian be a target?Christians who are targets do!
I doubt it. But why compare Ratzinger with a right-wing politician?Wasn't Bush a Christian?
Don't forget, 'at least 500 other people killed'! Where does Ratzinger go where 500 people are killed?
Anything about Luther must be taken in the context that he was first and foremost a catholic priest. He never wanted to start his own church but was kicked out of the catholic church (it is interesting that others who said the same thing have since been readmitted while Luther hasn't). So without a church he started a new denomination and did not actually want it named after himself. He still considered himself a catholic priest. So yes his statements are going to support the catholic church with the exception of where he believed their practices to be wrong.Your own leader says; I never approved of a schism, nor will I approve of it for all eternity. . . . That the Roman Church is more honored by God than all others is not to be doubted. St, Peter and St. Paul, forty-six Popes, some hundreds of thousands of martyrs, have laid down their lives in its communion, having overcome Hell and the world; so that the eyes of God rest on the Roman church with special favor. Though nowadays everything is in a wretched state, it is no ground for separating from the Church. On the contrary, the worse things are going, the more should we hold close to her, for it is not by separating from the Church that we can make her better. We must not separate from God on account of any work of the devil, nor cease to have fellowship with the children of God who are still abiding in the pale of Rome on account of the multitude of the ungodly. There is no sin, no amount of evil, which should be permitted to dissolve the bond of charity or break the bond of unity of the body. For love can do all things, and nothing is difficult to those who are united.
Martin Luther to Pope Leo X, January 6, 1519
more than a year after the Ninety-Five Theses
quoted in The Facts about Luther, 356
Hi Josh
I noted the obvious. YES, we all know, it was claimed that Peter was in Rome. Actually, I'm not sure too many contest that (I don't)...
Perhaps the RCC has had a change of heart toward Luther...there was this thread concerning that:Anything about Luther must be taken in the context that he was first and foremost a catholic priest. He never wanted to start his own church but was kicked out of the catholic church (it is interesting that others who said the same thing have since been readmitted while Luther hasn't). So without a church he started a new denomination and did not actually want it named after himself. He still considered himself a catholic priest. So yes his statements are going to support the catholic church with the exception of where he believed their practices to be wrong.