Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Please, don't cast the blame at me as if I forced you to make the inaccurate statements that you have made. Own your own messages.
That same right as yours saying to abstain from certain meats and it's better to be vegetarian.![]()
In truth I'd say it's to be more like Christ. I admire those who devote themselves to celibacy. I'm just glad I wasn't called into such as I'd have been a miserable failure. But that's just old randy Randy. I'm better now that I'm older.
If I'm wrong, please tell me where? I've simply asked questions and made statements based off of what I've read while in this thread. I'm not placing blame, simply specifying my source of information.
It's their way.
The concept most people are mistaken on is that a Catholic priest cannot marry.
This isn't true. there are tens of thousands of Catholic priests who have married. They are no longer clergy but they remain priests.(Roman rite)
My Church also does not permit a priest, deacon or bishop to marry and remain clergy. But we do ordain men who are already married.
This is not forbidding to marry. It is a choice freely made.
The celibacy of priests is based on the celibacy of Christ. St. Paul was celibate and even wrote about it's virtues. It's astounding to me how a group of people who supposedly hold the bible in such high esteem fail to recognize this.
I don't think I want to spend too much time on this little garden path
Suffice it to say, celibate people can become priests and married people can, under certain conditions but a celibate person who decides to marry leaves the active priesthood.
1 Cor 9:5 Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife, as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?
Is this not teaching that not only did some of the Apostles take a wife, but that Paul and Barnabas would be right in doing so at that point if they wished?
Pastor, Bishop, Priest...all the same to me
Does he still lead the local congregation? I'm guessing that once a preist always a priest, kind of like once a pastor always a pastor. So it's all well and good to say "He's still a priest" because technically he is. That however seems to simply be a nicer way of saying "We won't need your services anymore".
A priest or a part of a royal priesthood?Actually, if they were Christians, they were priests long before they were every clergy and will be so throughout eternity. Every believer in Jesus Christ is a priest.
The fact does remain, however, that clergy in the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church are forbidden to marry unless they sneak in the back door like married Anglican priests who convert to Catholicism and are enrolled as Catholic clergymen.
So you believe in the office of a priest?
One can function in that office without being clergy. Just in a different way. It's not like they are given the boot. Just given a different type of ministry.
The best part of being an unmarried pastor is he doesn't ever get embarrassed when his wife runs of with the piano player![]()
And you think marriage would cure a deviate mind? I think such a man would have done it married or single.The worst part of being an unmarried priest is being hauled before a jury on charges of molestation of former altar boys and being found guilty.![]()
And you think marriage would cure a deviate mind? I think such a man would have done it married or single.
A priest or a part of a royal priesthood?
The real fact is that for many centuries Roman Catholics had married priests and even some Popes. At some point they found it better that they should remain celibate and unmarried. I don't know if that was a good decision or a poor one. That's for the Roman Catholic to decide. Seems they've opened a door recently(Anglican rite) and things could change as it's not Dogma.
I know it's a hot topic at Catholic sites. By hot I mean both heated and of great interest to Catholics.
Yes, I know that there is a lot of discussion going on at the fringes of the Catholic Church both for the ordination of women as priestly clergy and for permitting celibate clergymen to marry. From what I see the discussion has not yet materialized within the primary centers of Catholic authority. I could easily be wrong on this. Time, as they say, will tell.
a celibate person who decides to marry leaves the active priesthood.
Thats false doctrine. Paul didn't forbid marriage to any Christian or Church leader.
Thats false doctrine. Paul didn't forbid marriage to any Christian or Church leader.
Right. The idea of a Christian clergy/laity dichotomy is simply the Sinai model brought forward and combined with later ever-virgin ideas of both Mary and Joseph.
I suppose you're referring to the Public School System in the US? As far as I know, that's the only system that permits such a thing...Likewise an unfaithful wife. Neither situation is at all godly, but I cannot think of any examples of your case although we all know examples of my case. The problem lies in a system which permits such abuses to occur.