The reason why Christ's blood had to be shed was to satisfy the justice in God's heart. Justice requires that the full penalty for sin be paid, so He died in our place to satisfy His requirement for justice so that He could show mercy; because the wages of sin is death.
So God has a heart problem and set up a poor system or was powerless against some rule He wrote or was weak in some way so He needed “blood” to satisfy a heart need God had? My God is in need of nothing, has no heart problem and does not set up a poor judicial system that requires blood to fulfill a need of His, since he ‘needs” nothing.
Did you make this rule up: “full penalty for sin be paid”, did God make it up or is it some cosmic “Law” God has to obey?
Can God/Christ forgive sins?
If a sin is forgiven
it would be wrong to also have it paid for, because that eliminates the significance of being forgiven. If the parent or judge forgives the offence then there is no punishment paying for the crime, but there can be disciplining of even forgiven offences, best given prior to forgiveness.
Justice must be served and with a perfect well thought out Law justice and fairness can be completely merciful and righteous. If the law allows for consistent equal forgiveness under certain conditions, that does not make it unjust to forgive.
In context: Ro. 6: 23 “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”. Are the “wages of sin” the second death (hell) since it is contrasted with eternal life?
We also have what is earned with sin contrasted with the gift of eternal life.
The gift is not like what is earned, so to suggest the debt of sin is paid, would also suggest the payment is for eternal life and thus not a gift but an obligation.
We may like to think about God’s judgement being similar to a judgement in court of law (with poorly written rules), but Christ wants us to think about god as our Father:
Think about this:
There is a, one of a kind, Tiffany vase on your parent’s mantel that has been handed down by your great grandmother. You, as a young person, get angry with your parents and smash the vase. You are later sorry about it and repent and your loving parent can easily forgive you. Since this was not your first rebellious action your father, in an act of Love, collects every little piece of the vase and you willingly work together with your father hours each night for a month painstakingly gluing the vase back together. The vase is returned to the mantel to be kept as a show piece, but according to Antique Road Show, it is worthless. Working with your father helped you develop a much stronger relationship, you are comfortable being around him and have a greater appreciation for his Love.
Was your father fair/just and would others see this as being fair treatment? Did this “punishment” help resolve the issue?
Was restitution made or was reconciliation made and would you feel comfortable/ justified standing by your father in the future?
Suppose after smashing the vase, repenting and forgiveness, your older brother says he will work with your father putting the vase together, so you can keep up with your social life. Would this scenario allow you to stand comfortable and justified by your father?
Suppose Jesus the magician waved his hands over the smashed vase and restored it perfectly to the previous condition, so there is really very little for you to be forgiven of or for you to do. Would this scenario allow you to stand comfortable and justified by your father?
What are the benefits of being lovingly disciplined?
Suppose it is not you that breaks the vase but your neighbor breaks into your house because he does not like your family being so nice and smashes the Tiffany vase, but he is caught on a security camera. Your father goes to your neighbor with the box of pieces and offers to do the same thing with him as he offered to do with you, but the neighbor refuses. Your father explains: everything is caught on camera and he will be fined and go to jail, but the neighbor, although sorry about being caught, still refuses. The neighbor loses all he has and spends 10 years in jail. So was the neighbor fairly disciplined or fairly punished?
How does the neighbor’s punishment equal your discipline and how is it not equal?
Was the neighbor forgiven and if not why not?
Atonement is a huge topic, but I will discuss it with you if you want?