Proof science is inspired

[RickG]

But today, instead of doing this in the name of God, people have jettisoned God out of the picture and actually use science against Him and His Word.

Science started out as pure wheat; but the tares are now outgrowing the wheat as this dispensation comes to a close.

You mean things like learning the order of things in the genesis creation story are out of order.

You mean like learning that there has never been a "global" flood.

That can only lead to only two things.

1. God is a trickster and deliberately misleads us.
2. God is not infallible.

I think the better route to take is to see and understand that the book of Genesis is not literal.

Yes AV, I proudly wear the mark you have given all the scientists. We are so evil, 666.

 

[loktai]

Nothing is more supported.

My chair is more supported.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

It should only if it wanted to elevate itself from a Satan inspired little godless joke, into something that can know, and deal in reality that is not lobotomized by self limiting present state physical only fishbowl criteria.

Do you think that sounds clever? It's meaningless.

It is all relevant...just not to one sided brain so called science!

Enlighten me. What would spirituality add to my understanding of why that pen I just dropped fell on the floor?

Of wisdom? It comes down from the Father of lights.

That's not a definition. But as you've said it, it would appear that your claim is that science (as wisdom) comes down from the Father of lights.

You defeat your own arguments . Perhaps you'd be good enough to update your title line.

No it is a fact that they claim such Satanic foolishness as a universe in a hot little soup.

It would appear to be a fact that you don't know when science ends and philosophy of science begins.

 

[AV1611VET]

There's one important thing to keep in mind though:
If there's evidence to be expected, evidence left by claimed events etc., absence of such evidence means evidence of absence.

Fine ... then they can say there's no evidence supporting that claim; but to say for a fact that there's no teapot circling the sun is, in my opinion, overstepping.

 

[Criada]

Mod Hat On

​

This is not General Apologetics, folks!
After a Staff review, we have decided to keep the thread closed. If you'd like to continue the conversation, please make sure to start the discussion in the correct place and to review the rules before posting.

If you have any questions about this, please send a pm to a Staff member. Thank you for your patience while Staff reviewed the thread.

Mod Hat Off​