- Sep 23, 2005
- 32,061
- 5,873
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
It involves a possibly edited e-mail taken totally out of context, unlike the previous thread which revolved around edited videos taken totally out of context.
Indeed it does. And which also is related to an open conversation with the CEO. I would be glad if they released more of the context. On the other hand, I don't just dismiss what they did release. Because Youtube has been taking actions against their creators for some time in regards to demonetization, removing videos, putting people in a limited state, or just removing people from the platform.
You may not care. I enjoy watching a fair amount of Youtube because I can get long form content, often times with interaction or debate. I don't care for five minute news segments from Fox or MSNBC where they have two people yelling and no one has time to make a point.
I watch progressives, moderate democrats, conservatives, libertarians, etc. to get various views. And almost any channel that is not a major news network is getting actions taken against them because Youtube is editing for content.
That is a free speech issue. And yes, free speech does matter here because Youtube is operating under liability protections as a platform rather than an editorial publisher.
I am not so much interested in this because I love Project Veritas' approach. Their narrative driven videos are annoying, and they release so little context you can't make out what is going on. But I am interested because I care about the topic this regards. And while his stuff is annoying companies often respond to it with information that may clarify.
Last edited:
Upvote
0