Probability and Creation

[JacksBratt]

It doesn't stand on it's own 'for me'. It stands on it's own, period. We accept the validity of evolution because of the mountains of evidence which support it, and the countless predictions it has made which have all been proved correct.

Acceptance of evolution is not an opinion. It's a rational conclusion. That we have a forum to debate it is simply a product of peoples' irrationality, and of poor education.

Again, this is your opinion, and the opinion of many others. However, on the flip side, there are many educated, accredited, professional scientific people that use the same "evidence" to disprove the TOE and promote the creation belief.

 

[JacksBratt]

What does the Federated States of Micronesia have to do with anything?

FSM was Forced Satirical Myth. Wasn't it?

 

[OldWiseGuy]

.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

FSM was Forced Satirical Myth. Wasn't it?

I think you might be right.

 

[Oafman]

Again, this is your opinion, and the opinion of many others. However, on the flip side, there are many educated, accredited, professional scientific people that use the same "evidence" to disprove the TOE and promote the creation belief.

Even if that were true (it's not) it would make no difference to the validity of the theory of evolution. It stands on its own, regardless of who does and doesn't agree.

 

[JacksBratt]

Even if that were true (it's not) it would make no difference to the validity of the theory of evolution. It stands on its own, regardless of who does and doesn't agree.

Really? They should make a forum where this can be debated.