Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Another liberal lie....Except the embargo of Gaza (an act of war)
And the Gazans can stop it anytime they want by turning on Hamas and giving up their ID's, locations, movements, etc.....except they won't because they approve of Hamas killing Jews. I have no sympathy in my heart for the Gazans; they have brought all of this on themselves.And obviously it affects the entire Gazan populace, not just Hamas and other terrorists who participated in the terror attack.
You're the one who called embargos an act of war.Another liberal lie....
Suppose a Democratic president invaded Panama and killed a bunch of people, then China took their side and invaded the US with the object of reducing it to rubble and killing anyone who resisted. Would Republicans fight to defend their homes?Another liberal lie....
And the Gazans can stop it anytime they want by turning on Hamas and giving up their ID's, locations, movements, etc.....except they won't because they approve of Hamas killing Jews. I have no sympathy in my heart for the Gazans; they have brought all of this on themselves.
False dichotomy.Suppose a Democratic president invaded Panama and killed a bunch of people, then China took their side and invaded the US with the object of reducing it to rubble and killing anyone who resisted. Would Republicans fight to defend their homes?
So you are reduced to 'what if's' now? You must find your own arguments less than persuasive.Suppose a Democratic president invaded Panama and killed a bunch of people, then China took their side and invaded the US with the object of reducing it to rubble and killing anyone who resisted. Would Republicans fight to defend their homes?
Between NATIONS which Gaza is not.....how many times do you have to be told?You're the one who called embargos an act of war.
And not even if Gaza was a nation based upon Gazas behavior. Tge blockade was legit.Between NATIONS which Gaza is not.....how many times do you have to be told?
So the curtailment of food to the Warsaw ghetto was merely domestic policy? Subject to no criticism?Between NATIONS which Gaza is not.....how many times do you have to be told?
No, what find is an astonishing unwillingness of conservatives to face up to the actual history of the state of Israel, which I find rather strange as it doesn't justify the HAMAS attack any more than the imaginary history pedalled the conservatives.So you are reduced to 'what if's' now? You must find your own arguments less than persuasive.
We are not talking about the Warsaw ghetto here; go start another thread on that is it is so important to you!!!!!!!!!!!So the curtailment of food to the Warsaw ghetto was merely domestic policy? Subject to no criticism?
You mean the 'progressive-leftist democratic party propaganda history'? Only you guys believe in that fairy tail.No, what find is an astonishing unwillingness of conservatives to face up to the actual history of the state of Israel, which I find rather strange as it doesn't justify the HAMAS attack any more than the imaginary history pedalled the conservatives.
Yes, that's the one. The one I've read about over the years, the one I've spoken about with Jews and Muslims in the region. Maybe you can tell me why it is a fairy tale. You can also tell me why it is so important to you to denounce real history as a fairy tale, since it doesn't justify the Hamas October attack any better than the one you tell. You have basically called me a liar to my face. Why? Why is it so important to you?You mean the 'progressive-leftist democratic party propaganda history'? Only you guys believe in that fairy tail.
We've all read up on the actual histories and haven't all read the imaginary histories produced by leftist anti-semetics or Arabic propaganda.No, what find is an astonishing unwillingness of conservatives to face up to the actual history of the state of Israel, which I find rather strange as it doesn't justify the HAMAS attack any more than the imaginary history pedalled the conservatives.
That's the question I am asking. what "actual histories?" Where are you guys getting this stuff?We've all read up on the actual histories and haven't all read the imaginary histories produced by leftist anti-semetics or Arabic propaganda.
Sure, but why is it so important to you that the agression is all one-sided? And has been "throughout the years?"The Hamas attack you mention is a singular event. The history does not justify ANY of the attacks that have occurred down through the years. It doesn't justify the deep seared hatred and murderous intent of the Palestinians. Throughout the years.
From history.That's the question I am asking. what "actual histories?" Where are you guys getting this stuff?
It is all one sided. The only thing Israel did was take what was offered. Even though the Arabs refused. And Israel was IMMEDIATELY attacked by the Arabs. The UN partitioned Palestine and By 1948 Israel had secured the area against the attacks of the Arabs. Then as soon as Great Britain left, the Arabs attacked again en mass. The aggressors again. And all through the years the Arabs attacked Israel over and over again. They just never stopped. In some of these fights that the Arabs started, Israel won and seized more territory. Which is the Arabs fault because they attacked.Sure, but why is it so important to you that the agression is all one-sided? And has been "throughout the years?"
Even though the Arabs refused. They "refused" the Mandate too and fought the British over it. Or is that part of "the imaginary histories produced by leftist anti-semetics or Arabic propaganda.".
This is known history.
Yes, just goes show how bad they hate the Jews. And the anti-Semetic left wants to blame the Jews.Even though the Arabs refused. They "refused" the Mandate too and fought the British over it. Or is that part of "the imaginary histories produced by leftist anti-semetics or Arabic propaganda."
They hated the British mandate because the British were Jews? Jews fought the British Mandate as well (or are we not supposed to know that?) You're going to have to provide some sources. See, I've lived and travelled in Muslim countries over the years, always with my wife who is openly Jewish--and as recently as six months ago in Tunisa. We talked with both Muslims and Jews in those places about it--as well as doing our own reading. What have you got?Yes, just goes show how bad they hate the Jews. And the anti-Semetic left wants to blame the Jews.
If a foreign entity laid claim to a parcel of land in the heartland of the United States, removed the people from that land, took their homes and farms that had been in their families for generations, and restricted their freedom and basic rights if they tried to re-enter that land, how would you expect the people that were removed from that land to react?The only thing Israel did was take what was offered. Even though the Arabs refused. And Israel was IMMEDIATELY attacked by the Arabs. The UN partitioned Palestine and By 1948 Israel had secured the area against the attacks of the Arabs. Then as soon as Great Britain left, the Arabs attacked again en mass. The aggressors again. And all through the years the Arabs attacked Israel over and over again. They just never stopped.