trophy33
Well-Known Member
- Nov 18, 2018
- 13,831
- 5,621
- Country
- Czech Republic
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
I am afraid its not allowed to speculate about it here.That's understandable, but it seems that preterists have overreacted to that and gone too far the other way.
Is the following open to interpretation in terms of whether or not Jesus would come back one day visibly and/or bodily?
Acts 1:9 After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight. 10 They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11 “Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven.”
When Jesus ascended to heaven people literally saw Him before their very eyes go up towards heaven and He literally ascended bodily, right? This passage indicates that He will come back from heaven in the same way/manner in which He ascended to heaven. So, that means He will come back bodily and people will see Him. Do you agree? If not, then this is the kind of thing that makes some of us just as frustrated with preterism as you are with futurism.
But do you agree that Jesus and apostles, from Matthew to Revelation, expected it to happen soon, in the life time of their generation?
Preterists are trying to follow the timeframe, futurists are trying to follow their understanding of "how". Which inherently makes preterism much simpler and futurism full of complex charts and predictions.
But let us not forget historicism. There are not just those two. Anyway, I think that most Christians do not have any systematic eschatology or they have some unordered mix.
Last edited:
Upvote
0