Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Please: try to think about this without the Bible. This is a science not religion thread.
The universe existed long before life existed in the universe.
At least on that we can agree.If I found that there was no reason to "take up my cross and follow Jesus", my life would be a whole lot easier
Individuals do not evolve.
Dunno. It has nothing to do with Psychology 101.
That never happens.Individuals that are part of one species and then part of another, are "re-evolved" not evolved.
Gottservant said:In the beginning, the universe waiting for Evolution (by mutation) had to come first?
Sure. Why not.
That never happens.
It it every happened then where is the evidence of it happening? An organism does not start as one specie and the evolve into another.You are assuming it never happens (re-evolution) when you have the same foundation (as Evolution)?
I don't get it. You said the universe was waiting for evolution. I agreed with you.
It it every happened then where is the evidence of it happening? An organism does not start as one specie and the evolve into another.
That only happens with the X-Men.
He is so good he planned 4 million plus deaths?Unless it was designed to do exactly what it has done.
God is so good at planning things, that He planned it.
For this to make sense you would have to describe how a new adaption appear without a mutation.
We have no evidence for or method of detection a change made to a genome of a species that wasn't from either a mutation or human intervention.
He is so good he planned 4 million plus deaths?
I know most things can be said, another way to what they actually need to be - what's the difference? If you don't get what you want from me, as an Evolutionist... what does your theory of Evolution say that you should do? I was happy to rephrase what I believe for you, but you can't do that for me?
The proposition remains: if you are not saying mutation comes first, when you say "mutation has to come before adaptation", what are you saying?
It was a scientific experiment, you just refuse to believe that someone could be inspired by God to do better with Creation than had ever been done with Evolution before.
As to learning, there are plenty of things that I have found true about the words of Jesus, I am learning all the time to reinterpret and resubjectify those words in new contexts - as creates more meaning, when looked at from the greater perspective of God's inspiration of mankind. I have never, even once, used Jesus' words to confuse someone about the truth - if anything that should be humbling for an Evolutionist? You guys basically sell people strife in an atheoretical bubble wrap, whose only innocence is that you never really know what it means?
The ability to trigger or not certain genetic traits in immediate offspring is itself an inherited trait. It also tends to revert when the climate, famine crisis returns to normal in a generation or two.For example: When rats are fed a high fat diet, the offspring show a higher ability to digest fats.
Similar studies exist for drought conditions showing metabolic changes that are inherited.
But whether that species lives or dies, is subjective? Somethings live then die, other things die then live?
So now you are saying "in the beginning, Evolution had to be first" - wow! you guys are so confusing!
An adaptation can't have more than one consequence, but a mutation can? Can I get a word of consistency here?
The sentence makes sense... it implies something about how hard it is to get cake to remain consistent with the recipe?
Put it this way, if Jesus said "Go the extra mile" what does that apply to, when it comes to Evolution?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?