Presumptuous Creationists

[Morat]

Actually, it doesn't 'prove' that either.  It only proves that such journals don't publish creationist articles.   The reason could still be a host of explanations.  It couldn't perhaps be that such articles are rarely submitted to mainstream journals could it?  Or perhaps such articles are not well-documented or their research is not complete.  You jump to an unwarranted conclusion, CS.   For someone who complains about poor logic later in you post, you seem to suffer the same affliction.

   In one of the recent Evolution cases (I think it was Edwards, although Peloza is possibly) the Creationist's lawyers made the claim that they were 'censored' from journals. When asked to provide supporting evidence for this (rejection notices) they could not, nor could they name a single paper they had submitted.

    In fact, I have yet to find anywhere where a Creationist has brought forth a paper and rejection slip from any journal.

  It's not censorship when you don't even submit it.