I think your request would have come off better had you simply requested a Presbyterian forum for the purposes of discussing not only the 5 pts of Calvinism but also a shared belief in paedobaptism, the concept of a presbytery, issues within the organized Presbyterian churches, etc.
In labeling the request as Presbyterian/Reformed (NonBaptist), you set up a negative request - you created a request for a forum that would be free of Baptists (though accepting of other nonBaptist nonPresbyterian Reformed believers according to the title) rather than make a simple positive request for a denominational forum. That is how it came off to me and I am sure it did to others. As a result, there is more conflict in this thread than was needed.
Now some questions:
What about Cumberland Presbyterians - would they be accepted? Yep.
I saw a statement that Presbyterians "believe in the undefinable presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper" - so what about the position of the Orthodox Presbyterian who holds to the Westminister Confession which includes:
Does that fit? Is that what you are talking about? (If so, I don't see a real difference with Baptists in this fwiw. But that is another topic for another forum) yep and yep.
The way I see it...any presbyterian will be welcome to call this new forum home even if the word presbyterian isn't officially in their denominations name and there are plenty out there. This is why I differentiated in the threads title...by declaring Reformed(NON-Baptist)...it's quite simple and is not offensive in the least, and IMHO people that got offended don't know any better and don't know Presbyerianism, and reacted out of ignorance.
Forget I said anything about Traditional Reformed, or whatever.
And to be honest, there seems to be less than a handful of people here actively supporting this idea anyway...so the ball's in CF's court now...I've said my peace.
Last edited:
Upvote
0