depthdeception
Well-Known Member
Van said:I speak of sufficiency and he says infallibility and then says I post up the strawmen. Twaddle.
33...How is this not a strawman?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Van said:I speak of sufficiency and he says infallibility and then says I post up the strawmen. Twaddle.
Van,Van said:Usually when someone mentions "predestination" they do not have the biblical concept in mind, but rather the Reformed doctrine. The concept is that no plan of God can be thwarted, thus what God purposes and plans is predestined to occur. Thus the concept can be applied to any prophecy, for when God promises something, He fulfills it, He causes it to happen. Take Christ dying on the cross. According to 1 Peter 1:19-20, God knew before the foundation of the world, hence before creation, that Christ would shed His blood as a Lamb. This meshes well with Peter's words in Acts 2:23 which say Jesus the Nararene was "delivered over by the predestined plan and foreknowledge of God...." So Christ's death, his shedding of blood, was God's plan from before the creation. So while the Jews conspired and the Romans drove the nails, no one took Christ's life, He laid it down because of the command of His Father, John 10:18. Behold the Lamb of God...
Van said:I reposted my remarks and they speak for themselves
Van said:I believe in the Nicene Creed, I think it represents the plain meaning of scriptures. And DD does too, so his argument lacks integrety.
cygnusx1 said:All Reformed Christians as far as I can see agree with you that the fall was indeed part of God's plan .
And as you say , from God's perspective (God meant it for good) it was for the salvation of the human race , I see no way around this .
Perhaps those who are offended that God should have a purpose for permitting sin would care to explain the connection between the Knowledge of God and sin .......... because it seems a waste of time to me to just say "you are wrong" without saying why.....
also it would help communication if it is possible to remind ourselves to season our words with salt ........ otherwise nothing but conflict will ensue which can only drive people away.
the starting point could be summed up ; did God know for certain Adam would fall > Yes or no
You're on this website a lot so I assume you are a student without a job or family?depthdeception said:No, I believe the Nicene Creed because I have chosen to submit myself to the authority of the Church in regards to the matters outlined within it.
Tabatha2121 said:You're on this website a lot so I assume you are a student without a job or family?
Tabatha2121 said:You're on this website a lot so I assume you are a student without a job or family?
Van said:DD, if yolu believe in the Nicene Creed, you accept the plain meaning of scriptures as discerned by a whole lot of believers. Game set and match.
This is the RT doctrine and has nothing to do with predestination as presented in scripture. God causes His prophecy to happen, not because of knowledge of future events, but because He creates the future day by day. The future does not exist as part of creation, it exists as a concept God brings about. He declares the end from the beginning, He says what He is going to cause to happen, and then He makes it happen.In order to discuss predestination correctly you must also include foreknowledge, we are predestined because of Gods foreknowledge of the choices we will make, we are free to make any choice we want but God already knows the choices we will make and we are therefore predestined. Also prophecy comes true for the exact same reasons and it says that God is not a liar so the inspired Word of God does not lie. What is written will happen.
You have an interesting profile for someone with a wife and kids.depthdeception said:Actually, I work full time, go to school full time (Master's program), and have a wife and brand new baby daughter.
Van said:First we need to agree of the meaning of the word, foreknew.
Using todays dictionary, it includes the idea of knowing what will happen in the future.
But when the term translated as foreknew is used in the New Testament, it means to know something beforehand.
So it is an acknowledgment of information or a plan acquired or formulated in the past and using it in the present, and has absolutely nothing to do with knowledge of the future. Instead what is being said is things are happening in the present based on plans or knowledge from the past.
Tabatha2121 said:You have an interesting profile for someone with a wife and kids.
As you can see, DD has absolutely no clue as to what is being said.So "when" in the "past" did God "plan" to do "x" that is occuring "now?" God is not contingently bound to time--therefore, there is no "past" in which God plans anything. I know this is quite difficult for you to grasp, but God is dynamically present in every moment, so much so that each moment that unfolds is replete with the creative energy and possibility of the eternal God, not a prescripted series of linear events that are simply unfolding that which has been planned beforehand.
Van said:This is the RT doctrine and has nothing to do with predestination as presented in scripture. God causes His prophecy to happen, not because of knowledge of future events, but because He creates the future day by day. The future does not exist as part of creation, it exists as a concept God brings about. He declares the end from the beginning, He says what He is going to cause to happen, and then He makes it happen.
Van said:Elect, my post was directed to you, DD has nothing but twaddle on his mind.
As you can see, DD has absolutely no clue as to what is being said.