Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Therefore, what hope do you have that by speaking against the rapture as a lie, that you would go with them who believe in it, should you happen to be wrong?
The initial few minutes of the video has a major flaw and a false claim that the Day of the Lord is a strict post tribulation event. The speaker is saying that the Day of the Lord doesn't begin until the end of 7 years, in order to justified the post trib theory.Pretribulationist Revisionism
(Grant Jeffrey’s revision of early Church Posttrib viewpoints)
Pastor Tim Warner
http://www.answersinrevelation.org/Jeffrey.pdf
,
Bab2,
The trangression of desolation - triggers the Day of the Lord.
The abomination of desolation - triggers the great tribulation.
70th week begins with the confirmation of the Mt. Sinai covenant.
The person is the Antichrist, the world saying peace and safety
He suddenly commits the transgression of desolation - the Day of the Lord begins.
God has him killed, brought back to life, becomes the beast.
Image of the beast made, placed in the temple - the great tribulation begins.
In Deuteronomy 31:9-13, it is not "about" 7 years that the Mt. Sinai covenant is to be confirmed but 7 years in the text.Based on Matthew 10:5-7, and Romans 1:16, and Galatians 1:14-18, the Gospel was taken "first" to Daniel's people for about 7 years before Paul began his ministry to the Gentiles.
In Deuteronomy 31:9-13, it is not "about" 7 years that the Mt. Sinai covenant is to be confirmed but 7 years in the text.
The Jews, nor the world, were saying peace and safety at the time of the destruction of the temple and city. It was not sudden destruction to come up on them. They were in stress the entire time leading up to Jewish revolt wars.
I think you need to figure out in what way. The feast of tabernacles will be observed when Jesus has returned. It is in Zechariah 14.For some reason you must have missed the fact that based on Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, the New Covenant has made the Sinai Covenant "obsolete"...
.
I think you need to figure out in what way. The feast of tabernacles will be observed when Jesus has returned. It is in Zechariah 14.
Now for a change, go read Deuteronomy 31:9-13, see when the leaders of Israel are supposed to confirm the Mt. Sinai covenant for 7 year, what feast day, for the benefit of future generations that weren't there to know anything.
I think you need to figure out in what way. The feast of tabernacles will be observed when Jesus has returned. It is in Zechariah 14.
The Galatians - gentiles, who had now become Christians, were being mislead, as such, that they had to do the same things the Jews were required to do under the Mt Sinai covenant. Which Paul was saying was taking a giant step backwards.Paul wouldn't likely agree.
Galatians 4
9 But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?
10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.
11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.
The Galatians - gentiles, who had now become Christians, were being mislead, as such, that they had to do the same things the Jews were required to do under the Mt Sinai covenant. Which Paul was saying was taking a giant step backwards.
Which is the case of any person who thinks by virtue of becoming a Christian - they have become Israel and/or a Jew.
In Zechariah 14, the observing the feast of tabernacles will be recognition that God took the Jews out of Egypt, lead them through the desert, living in make shift structures, until the second generation could enter the promised land - which God gave them forever. The entire world will have to send representatives to Israel, to acknowledge that God did all those things and fulfilled His promises to Israel..
Yes, all who share the faith of Abraham are his spiritual seed. But this cannot negate the very explicitly stated promises made to the ancient nations of Judah and Israel.
There is not even one promise of blessing in this world given to the church. You cannot cite even one.
Eph 2:11-13
11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
KJV
Based on what you said there, is to call Apostle Paul a liar in the above Scripture.
Based on what you say, Gentiles cannot be "made nigh by the blood of Christ" in "the covenants of promise" God gave to Israel. That is to say Gentiles have no Salvation through Christ Jesus, if they do not inherit in the promises. That's what your false statement means.
Once again, you wrongly assume that God is going to create a separate Israel of the seed only which believing Gentiles will not be a part of. That idea is nowhere stated in God's Word.
Just that question alone shows how ludicrous John Darby's doctrine of Dispensationalism is. Darby's theories of Dispensationalism were devised just to drum up support for the pre-trib rapture theory, which also is false.
Paul wouldn't likely agree.
Galatians 4
9 But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?
10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.
11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.
Was he referring to explicitly stated scripture in those verses?Paul would not disagree with explicitly stated scripture.
If that is the case, why was a fully developed Dispensationalism (less the pre-tribulation rapture) already being taught in England By Lewis Way more than five years before before Darby ever wrote anything? And why was an end time spiritual restoration of the Jews, along with their end tome return to their homeland, being insisted upon in England by William Lowth, more than a hundred years earlier than that?
If that is the case, why was a fully developed Dispensationalism (less the pre-tribulation rapture) already being taught in England By Lewis Way more than five years before before Darby ever wrote anything?
And why was an end time spiritual restoration of the Jews, along with their end tome return to their homeland, being insisted upon in England by William Lowth, more than a hundred years earlier than that?
Opinion. Citations?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?