Zebra1552
Urban Nomad. Literally.
- Nov 2, 2007
- 14,461
- 820
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
I don't know why you'd need to ask it if it's already been answered using simpler terms.A framed question is simply a question that is designed to get an answer to a specific question. It's the opposite of saying, "Hey, what do you think about Matthew 28:19?" I'm interested in a serious conversation and don't know why can't just answer the simple and direct questions I provided. I don't know why you would refuse to answer a simple grammatical question.
I'm dogmatic about the idea of it being for some and not others, not that it's inapplicable. If you remember my statement a few posts ago...You seem pretty dogmatic about the idea that Matthew 28:19-20 no longer applies when it comes to discipleship but seem very vague when it comes to what has taken its place.
It applies especially to its target audience and its target audience must be kept in mind when one is reading it. Not all are called to raise people up in the faith, Paul touches on this concept of gifts in at least 3 places. Just as not all are called to baptize others, just as not all are called to be baptized.Does all of Scripture only apply to those who happened to be present when it was written or spoken of? For instance, does the Epistle to the Romans only have application to the church that existed in Rome in the first century?
Again, you might try putting my statements together.
No, I'm not going to provide ONE statement. I'm going to go tell you to read all of Paul's writings and look at the Gospels. It's done via relationship.I'm just trying to get some specific answers. I believe that discipling is done through baptism and teaching. Could you provide a similar statement describing how you believe discipling is done?
Red herring. We're talking about foundation not cornerstones.So do you think there could be multiple chief cornerstones as well since the Bible does not specifically say in the passage that Jesus is the chief cornerstone?
Well that depends on the context. If they imply that brick was the only thing it was made of, then yes, I would call them a liar. Just like your context implies that the apostles and the sacraments are the only foundation due to your extreme focus on them.Regardless, my original statement was that the church was built on the foundation of the apostles. This remains true whether or not multiple parties are involved. If someone says they built a house out of brick are you going to call them a liar and say that there was mortar there too?
Upvote
0