Junia
Well-Known Member
- May 17, 2020
- 2,795
- 1,387
- 43
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Polygamy mentioned in scriptures was for various reasons.
A patriarchal system was instituted and because of that system everyone was now able to access at least "middle management" for issues that come up in life instead of going to the Top.
In several instances polygamy was mandated. If a brother died for some reason then his spouse was to be married to another brother and the child of that union was to be for the deceased brother. The book of Ruth is central to this theme of a kinsman Redeemer.
Then we have Moses.
Who after receiving the Law took a "barbarian" wife. (Cushite) obviously it was at the direction of God.
King's of Israel were often started out with two wives. There was no number limit placed on them.
Then we have polygamy in the New Testament.
The average wealthy Roman Businessman in various places had a wife that was of Roman upper society that was married for Business purposes or political reasons. The man also usually had a "consort"/girlfriend that was for true companionship. The Society wife would have offspring for carrying on the family name and was an heir. The consort's children...they didn't fare so well. But actually the girlfriend's status of being a consort was a recognized position in Roman society as having the ear of the man. Societal wives usually despised/disrespected their husbands for being placed first in name only but not function in their husband's hearts.
Paul, in a bit of a sarcastic jab at the situation, called both girlfriend and wife equally "wives" in the Pastoral letters.
Which of course infuriated and insulted Roman society because Romans only had one wife...but his letter was addressed to Timothy and was considered a form of an internal memo.
Kinda a backhanded fashion of telling Timothy that he could get married but only to one woman and no consort was going to be allowed and not to allow a wealthy person to take a leadership role.
But basically in all instances because of the role and opportunities for women no one suggested that support (in both directions) or in other words the symbiotic relationships with the multiple women and the only man be destroyed.
And in these modern times with everything on television I viewed a couple of programs covering a plural marriage...
The guy in the marriage was always hen pecked far more than I could ever withstand in any shape whatsoever.
Any thoughts that being in a plural marriage was about hedonism went right out the window, the door, and the chimney...
The children and the henpecking completely controlled the husband's life. He never caught a break...ever... even in his "down time".
So it became even more obvious that a person in such a position had no time to actually be of service to a church group.
I often wonder how Solomon coped.with all the nagging! All those wives and concubines!!
and I say this as a woman myself
Upvote
0