• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Please explain the Trinity

elopez

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2010
2,503
92
Lansing, MI
✟25,706.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Then you would have one person not 3 separate people
No you have three separate people as there exists three people: The Father, The Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. With your automobile and car analogy you only have one car, not three, which is why the analogy is incomparable.

It sounds like you are saying he is one and more than one at the same time! That does not make sense!
I have never said God is more than one being, just three different persons. What doesn't make sense is how you derive at more than one from me saying one God.

And it also sounds like many of you guys are using the term persons to describe more than one person.
That's because we are. Person is singular, so persons means more than one person.

I'm not getting this; in grade school I learned that "people" was plural for "person".
People as it is plural is the same as persons, yes.

To use persons to discribe more than one person is akin to using gooses to discribe more than one goose. Maybe that has something to do with why what you guys are saying doesn't make any sense to me; i don't know?
Even then the grammatical mistake is really of no significance that the idea of one God being existent as three different people cannot be understood. Each person is the same one God and has the same will and nature. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. God has one will and one nature, so if each person possesses it equally, they are the same one God. Each person does possess the same nature and will so each person is God.
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
No you have three separate people as there exists three people: The Father, The Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. With your automobile and car analogy you only have one car, not three, which is why the analogy is incomparable.
No! In my analogy I have 3 separate cars, but they are 1 automobile; 3 in 1. Now if that doesn’t make any sense to you, maybe you can understand why what you are saying makes no sense to me.
I have never said God is more than one being, just three different persons.
A person IS a being. You can't have 1 person be 3 separate beings, or 3 individual people be 1 being; it doesn't make sense.

What doesn't make sense is how you derive at more than one from me saying one God.
The same way you derived that I only have 1 car simply because I said I have only 1 automobile.
That's because we are. Person is singular, so persons means more than one person.
Not in the English language it doesn’t; “People” is “plural”, person is singular.

People as it is plural is the same as persons, yes.

No. “Persons” is not a word in the English language, any more than “Gooses” in reference to more than one Goose.
Even then the grammatical mistake is really of no significance that the idea of one God being existent as three different people cannot be understood. Each person is the same one God and has the same will and nature. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. God has one will and one nature, so if each person possesses it equally, they are the same one God. Each person does possess the same nature and will so each person is God.
Would it be accurate to say they are each a fraction of God and when together they equal a complete God?

K
 
Upvote 0

elopez

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2010
2,503
92
Lansing, MI
✟25,706.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
No! In my analogy I have 3 separate cars, but they are 1 automobile; 3 in 1. Now if that doesn’t make any sense to you, maybe you can understand why what you are saying makes no sense to me.
Again you would not have 3 separate cars as only one would exist. This is incomparable to the Trinity because there are three separate people: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. There are actually three distinct people existing simultaneously, where as if you had 1 automobile you wouldn't have three cars.

A person IS a being. You can't have 1 person be 3 separate beings, or 3 individual people be 1 being; it doesn't make sense.
I'm not saying one person can be three separate beings. I am saying one God can exist as three separate people. You keep saying it doesn't make sense but you haven't explained or shown why it doesn't make sense.

The same way you derived that I only have 1 car simply because I said I have only 1 automobile.
It is not the same way because you would not have three cars but only one. There exists three people of the Trinity.

Not in the English language it doesn’t; “People” is “plural”, person is singular.
Right.

No. “Persons” is not a word in the English language, any more than “Gooses” in reference to more than one Goose.
You do realize this grammatical issue is irrelevant and seems to say nothing about the Trinity.

Would it be accurate to say they are each a fraction of God and when together they equal a complete God?
I've already answered this. No, it would not be accurate to say that. Each person is fully God. The Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Spirit is God. As each person shares the same nature and will they are one God.
 
Upvote 0

ChristianT

Newbie Orthodox
Nov 4, 2011
2,059
89
Somewhere in God's Creation.
✟25,331.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
person |ˈpərsən|
noun ( pl. people |ˈpēpəl| or persons )
1 a human being regarded as an individual : the porter was the last person to see her | she is a person of astonishing energy.
• used in legal or formal contexts to refer to an unspecified individual : the entrance fee is $10.00 per person.
• [in sing. ] [with adj. ] an individual characterized by a preference or liking for a specified thing : she's not a cat person.
• an individual's body : I have publicity photographs on my person at all times.
• a character in a play or story : his previous roles in the person of a fallible cop.
2 Grammar a category used in the classification of pronouns, possessive determiners, and verb forms, according to whether they indicate the speaker ( first person), the addressee ( second person), or a third party ( third person).
3 Christian Theology each of the three modes of being of God, namely the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, who together constitute the Trinity.
PHRASES
be one's own person do or be what one wishes or in accordance with one's own character rather than as influenced by others.
in person with the personal presence or action of the individual specified : he had to pick up his welfare check in person.
in the person of in the physical form of : trouble arrived in the person of a short, mustached Berliner.
ORIGIN Middle English : from Old French persone, from Latin persona ‘actor's mask, character in a play,’ later ‘human being.’
USAGE The words people and persons can both be used as the plural of person, but they are not used in exactly the same way. People is by far the more common of the two words and is used in most ordinary contexts: : a group of people ;: there were only about ten people ;: several thousand people have been rehoused. Persons, on the other hand, tends now to be restricted to official or formal contexts, as in : this vehicle is authorized to carry twenty persons ;: no persons admitted without a pass. In some contexts, persons, by pointing to the individual, may sound less friendly than people:: the number should not be disclosed to any unauthorized persons.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟52,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I realize several people have asked for an explanation of the Trinity, but the answers given doesn’t quite make sense to me and because I can’t respond on those threads I have to start my own. So here is my questions:
*Is Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit the same God with 3 nicknames? if so how could one be the son and the other the father?
*Are they each a fraction of a God and only when together they are a complete God? (kinda like the "egg white, yolk, and shell" explanation I've heard before
*Or are they each 3 separate Gods? (Polytheism)
If something different please explain

Ken

God is a title not a Name, as in:
God the Father
God the Son
God the Holy Spirit

Each is an incarnation of the One God of the universe.

This is not polytheism even though there are three separate deities here simply because they are all one God. Much like there is only one government governing these United States even though that Government is subdivided into three equal but separate branches. Polytheists believe that there are multiple gods. a Sun god, a god of the sea A god of the harvest etc. all separate with their own agenda and own rules. In governmental terms that would be like each state having it's own Executive, Congressional, and Judicial branches that were completely independent of all the others.

Here the Trinity is one God manifested in three separate but equal beings. Remember God is a title and not an individual deity's name.
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Again you would not have 3 separate cars as only one would exist. This is incomparable to the Trinity because there are three separate people: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Yes and I have 3 separate cars! A Ford, a Chrysler, and a Chevy! And they all exist as 1 automobile! Why is this so hard for you to understand? Could it be for the same reason I’m having a hard time understanding your analogy?
There are actually three distinct people existing simultaneously, where as if you had 1 automobile you wouldn't have three cars.


Yes I do! 3 distinct cars existing simultaneously
I'm not saying one person can be three separate beings. I am saying one God can exist as three separate people.

Same thing! God is a person; and people are beings.
You keep saying it doesn't make sense but you haven't explained or shown why it doesn't make sense.
It doesn’t make sense to me for the same reason my 3 separate cars existing simultaneously as 1 automobile, doesn’t make sense to you.
It is not the same way because you would not have three cars but only one. There exists three people of the Trinity.

Why do you keep saying I only have 1 car, when I’ve told you over and over I have 3? I have 3 separate cars.
You do realize this grammatical issue is irrelevant and seems to say nothing about the Trinity.


Yes. That’s why I asked it as a side note. I just noticed everybody responding to the trinity seems to be making the exact same mistake. Just trying to see if there is a connection here.
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
God is a title not a Name, as in:
God the Father
God the Son
God the Holy Spirit

Each is an incarnation of the One God of the universe.

This is not polytheism even though there are three separate deities here simply because they are all one God. Much like there is only one government governing these United States even though that Government is subdivided into three equal but separate branches. Polytheists believe that there are multiple gods. a Sun god, a god of the sea A god of the harvest etc. all separate with their own agenda and own rules. In governmental terms that would be like each state having it's own Executive, Congressional, and Judicial branches that were completely independent of all the others.

Here the Trinity is one God manifested in three separate but equal beings. Remember God is a title and not an individual deity's name.

[FONT='Verdana','sans-serif']Since as we all know that each branch is only a fraction of a complete governing body and only together do they equal the complete governing body of the USA; it sounds like you agree with my previous statement that Jesus, the Holy Spirit, and God are each only a fraction of a God and only make up a complete God when they are together. Is that correct?[/FONT]
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟52,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
[FONT='Verdana','sans-serif']Since as we all know that each branch is only a fraction of a complete governing body and only together do they equal the complete governing body of the USA; it sounds like you agree with my previous statement that Jesus, the Holy Spirit, and God are each only a fraction of a God and only make up a complete God when they are together. Is that correct?[/font]

If by "fraction" you mean to say every member of the God Head has a unique and distinct role, and personality separate from each other, yet each in of Himself is still fully God, then Yes.

*God is not bound to my analogies.
 
Upvote 0

elopez

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2010
2,503
92
Lansing, MI
✟25,706.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Yes and I have 3 separate cars! A Ford, a Chrysler, and a Chevy! And they all exist as 1 automobile! Why is this so hard for you to understand? Could it be for the same reason I’m having a hard time understanding your analogy?
All I'm doing at this point is repeating myself as you're not really responding to much of what I'm saying. You cannot have a For, Chrysler, and a Chevy exist as one automobile while having the three cars exist simultaneously. Yet according to the Trinity there is one God existent as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Each person exists simultaneously, and each person has the same nature and will. Each person is the same one God. So no, it is not for the same reason at all.

Yes I do! 3 distinct cars existing simultaneously
There cannot be as there is only 1 automobile.

Same thing! God is a person; and people are beings. It doesn’t make sense to me for the same reason my 3 separate cars existing simultaneously as 1 automobile, doesn’t make sense to you.
Why do you keep saying I only have 1 car, when I’ve told you over and over I have 3? I have 3 separate cars.

No, God is not a person. God as incarnated of Christ is a person but still he is fully God too. And again, it's not the same reason because it's impossible for there to be three cars if there is only one automobile. It's not impossible for one God to exist as three distinct people simultaneously.

I keep saying you only have one because you would only have one. You could not have three as distinct cars but only one, it's either one or the other not both. Again with the Trinity it is different as there actually does exist three distinct people that are God.


Yes. That’s why I asked it as a side note. I just noticed everybody responding to the trinity seems to be making the exact same mistake. Just trying to see if there is a connection here.
Maybe it's not everyone else who is making the mistake. It could, after all, be you ya know. Unless this is the usual 'I am right and everyone else is wrong' attitude
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If by "fraction" you mean to say every member of the God Head has a unique and distinct role, and personality separate from each other, yet each in of Himself is still fully God, then Yes.

*God is not bound to my analogies.
No that would be polytheism. If you have 3 God Heads unique and distinct in roles and personality, and separate from each other yet a complete God; that would be polytheism. The only loophole that I can think of that can justify Monotheism would be if each God were a fraction of God and only when together they equal a complete God when together.

BTW our United States Government is closer to Polytheism than Monotheism because we are not ruled by a single ruler or ruling body like a dictator or king, we are ruled by 3 separate bodies each given distinct but equal powers.

Ken
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
All I'm doing at this point is repeating myself as you're not really responding to much of what I'm saying.
So how is what I’m saying different than what you are saying; except my analogy includes the description of 1 automobile and yours includes the description of 1 God?
You cannot have a For, Chrysler, and a Chevy exist as one automobile while having the three cars exist simultaneously.
Then you can’t have the Father, Son and Holy Spirit exist as one God while having the 3 God heads exist simultaneously.
Yet according to the Trinity there is one God existent as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Each person exists simultaneously, and each person has the same nature and will. Each person is the same one God. So no, it is not for the same reason at all.
So how is it different from my claim that I have one automobile existent as a Ford, Chrysler, and a Chevy? Each car existing simultaneously and each car has the same nature and will, and each car being the same automobile?

Again; how is what you’re saying different than what I’m saying?

K
 
Upvote 0
N

Nanopants

Guest
So since each emanations are a fraction of the single source of light; God, Jesus, and the HS are a fraction of God; would you agree?

Using that analogy, not exactly. Each emanation is of the same substance (the same light), but each emanation alone is not the source.

I really don't know if that's the nature of the Godhead, or whether that's considered heretical or not. It's what I saw in my conversion experience.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟52,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No that would be polytheism. If you have 3 God Heads unique and distinct in roles and personality, and separate from each other yet a complete God; that would be polytheism.
No as I explained that God is a title and not a name, There is only one God. This God is represented by three separate parts. Polytheism supposes or worships multiple gods.


The only loophole that I can think of that can justify Monotheism would be if each God were a fraction of God and only when together they equal a complete God when together.
And i agree so long as you incorporate the biblically based principle that all three are God in their own right.

BTW our United States Government is closer to Polytheism than Monotheism because we are not ruled by a single ruler or ruling body like a dictator or king, we are ruled by 3 separate bodies each given distinct but equal powers
.Evidently this is the part that is confusing you in that we are still only governed by one government. Each separate governing body is a representation of the greater whole or a incarnation of the one Government.
 
Upvote 0

elopez

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2010
2,503
92
Lansing, MI
✟25,706.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
So how is what I’m saying different than what you are saying; except my analogy includes the description of 1 automobile and yours includes the description of 1 God?
I've already explained how it is different. It is different on the basis that if you have one automobile, you cannot have three. Three cars could not exist as one as there would only be actually one vehicle.

With the Trinity, three people actually do exist simultaneously, not just one. There is one God but He is existent as three different people.


Then you can’t have the Father, Son and Holy Spirit exist as one God while having the 3 God heads exist simultaneously.
It's possible because first of all all three people actually exist. There is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit existing all at the same time. Second, there is one God that exists, and if each person is God then there are three people existent as the one God.

So how is it different from my claim that I have one automobile existent as a Ford, Chrysler, and a Chevy? Each car existing simultaneously and each car has the same nature and will, and each car being the same automobile?
I've explained this numerous times now. The relevant difference is that the Ford, Chrysler, and Chevy would not all exist at the same time if indeed there was but one automobile, however, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit can all exist at the same time as one God because each person actually does exist.

It's not like you could drive a Chevy, get out and switch to driving the Ford if again there is only one automobile.
 
Upvote 0

gaweatherford

Member
Jan 11, 2005
164
18
✟27,053.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I realize several people have asked for an explanation of the Trinity, but the answers given doesn’t quite make sense to me and because I can’t respond on those threads I have to start my own. So here is my questions:
*Is Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit the same God with 3 nicknames? if so how could one be the son and the other the father?
*Are they each a fraction of a God and only when together they are a complete God? (kinda like the "egg white, yolk, and shell" explanation I've heard before
*Or are they each 3 separate Gods? (Polytheism)
If something different please explain

Ken

I think before it can be grasped one has to realize that the concept of the trinity is more a response from the "phenomenon of it all" than it is of anything that could be put into mathematical terms. It was never mentioned in the Bible per se. Theologians, philosophers and early church fathers of the middle ages deduced the trinity after scrutinizing all the scripture in with the facts of Christ's appearance. So, over periods of years the trinity was discovered. The trinity is a nature (or capability) of God that God has chosen to reveal to man. We can't really compete for the understanding of it all because it is above us some what.

Spurgeon:
We can never understand how Father, Son, and Holy Spirit can be three and yet one.
For my part, I have long ago given up any desire to understand this great mystery,
for I am perfectly satisfied that, if I could understand it, it would not be true, because
God, from the very nature of things, must be incomprehensible
 
Upvote 0