razeontherock
Well-Known Member
What's good for the gooses is good for the ganders. Es. I think ...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What's good for the gooses is good for the ganders. Es. I think ...
No you have three separate people as there exists three people: The Father, The Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. With your automobile and car analogy you only have one car, not three, which is why the analogy is incomparable.Then you would have one person not 3 separate people
I have never said God is more than one being, just three different persons. What doesn't make sense is how you derive at more than one from me saying one God.It sounds like you are saying he is one and more than one at the same time! That does not make sense!
That's because we are. Person is singular, so persons means more than one person.And it also sounds like many of you guys are using the term persons to describe more than one person.
People as it is plural is the same as persons, yes.I'm not getting this; in grade school I learned that "people" was plural for "person".
Even then the grammatical mistake is really of no significance that the idea of one God being existent as three different people cannot be understood. Each person is the same one God and has the same will and nature. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. God has one will and one nature, so if each person possesses it equally, they are the same one God. Each person does possess the same nature and will so each person is God.To use persons to discribe more than one person is akin to using gooses to discribe more than one goose. Maybe that has something to do with why what you guys are saying doesn't make any sense to me; i don't know?
No! In my analogy I have 3 separate cars, but they are 1 automobile; 3 in 1. Now if that doesnt make any sense to you, maybe you can understand why what you are saying makes no sense to me.No you have three separate people as there exists three people: The Father, The Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. With your automobile and car analogy you only have one car, not three, which is why the analogy is incomparable.
A person IS a being. You can't have 1 person be 3 separate beings, or 3 individual people be 1 being; it doesn't make sense.I have never said God is more than one being, just three different persons.
The same way you derived that I only have 1 car simply because I said I have only 1 automobile.What doesn't make sense is how you derive at more than one from me saying one God.
Not in the English language it doesnt; People is plural, person is singular.That's because we are. Person is singular, so persons means more than one person.
People as it is plural is the same as persons, yes.
Would it be accurate to say they are each a fraction of God and when together they equal a complete God?Even then the grammatical mistake is really of no significance that the idea of one God being existent as three different people cannot be understood. Each person is the same one God and has the same will and nature. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. God has one will and one nature, so if each person possesses it equally, they are the same one God. Each person does possess the same nature and will so each person is God.
Again you would not have 3 separate cars as only one would exist. This is incomparable to the Trinity because there are three separate people: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. There are actually three distinct people existing simultaneously, where as if you had 1 automobile you wouldn't have three cars.No! In my analogy I have 3 separate cars, but they are 1 automobile; 3 in 1. Now if that doesnt make any sense to you, maybe you can understand why what you are saying makes no sense to me.
I'm not saying one person can be three separate beings. I am saying one God can exist as three separate people. You keep saying it doesn't make sense but you haven't explained or shown why it doesn't make sense.A person IS a being. You can't have 1 person be 3 separate beings, or 3 individual people be 1 being; it doesn't make sense.
It is not the same way because you would not have three cars but only one. There exists three people of the Trinity.The same way you derived that I only have 1 car simply because I said I have only 1 automobile.
Right.Not in the English language it doesnt; People is plural, person is singular.
You do realize this grammatical issue is irrelevant and seems to say nothing about the Trinity.No. Persons is not a word in the English language, any more than Gooses in reference to more than one Goose.
I've already answered this. No, it would not be accurate to say that. Each person is fully God. The Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Spirit is God. As each person shares the same nature and will they are one God.Would it be accurate to say they are each a fraction of God and when together they equal a complete God?
I realize several people have asked for an explanation of the Trinity, but the answers given doesnt quite make sense to me and because I cant respond on those threads I have to start my own. So here is my questions:
*Is Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit the same God with 3 nicknames? if so how could one be the son and the other the father?
*Are they each a fraction of a God and only when together they are a complete God? (kinda like the "egg white, yolk, and shell" explanation I've heard before
*Or are they each 3 separate Gods? (Polytheism)
If something different please explain
Ken
Yes and I have 3 separate cars! A Ford, a Chrysler, and a Chevy! And they all exist as 1 automobile! Why is this so hard for you to understand? Could it be for the same reason Im having a hard time understanding your analogy?Again you would not have 3 separate cars as only one would exist. This is incomparable to the Trinity because there are three separate people: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
There are actually three distinct people existing simultaneously, where as if you had 1 automobile you wouldn't have three cars.
I'm not saying one person can be three separate beings. I am saying one God can exist as three separate people.
It doesnt make sense to me for the same reason my 3 separate cars existing simultaneously as 1 automobile, doesnt make sense to you.You keep saying it doesn't make sense but you haven't explained or shown why it doesn't make sense.
It is not the same way because you would not have three cars but only one. There exists three people of the Trinity.
You do realize this grammatical issue is irrelevant and seems to say nothing about the Trinity.
God is a title not a Name, as in:
God the Father
God the Son
God the Holy Spirit
Each is an incarnation of the One God of the universe.
This is not polytheism even though there are three separate deities here simply because they are all one God. Much like there is only one government governing these United States even though that Government is subdivided into three equal but separate branches. Polytheists believe that there are multiple gods. a Sun god, a god of the sea A god of the harvest etc. all separate with their own agenda and own rules. In governmental terms that would be like each state having it's own Executive, Congressional, and Judicial branches that were completely independent of all the others.
Here the Trinity is one God manifested in three separate but equal beings. Remember God is a title and not an individual deity's name.
What about three distinct emanations, as if from a single source of light?
[FONT='Verdana','sans-serif']Since as we all know that each branch is only a fraction of a complete governing body and only together do they equal the complete governing body of the USA; it sounds like you agree with my previous statement that Jesus, the Holy Spirit, and God are each only a fraction of a God and only make up a complete God when they are together. Is that correct?[/font]
All I'm doing at this point is repeating myself as you're not really responding to much of what I'm saying. You cannot have a For, Chrysler, and a Chevy exist as one automobile while having the three cars exist simultaneously. Yet according to the Trinity there is one God existent as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Each person exists simultaneously, and each person has the same nature and will. Each person is the same one God. So no, it is not for the same reason at all.Yes and I have 3 separate cars! A Ford, a Chrysler, and a Chevy! And they all exist as 1 automobile! Why is this so hard for you to understand? Could it be for the same reason Im having a hard time understanding your analogy?
There cannot be as there is only 1 automobile.Yes I do! 3 distinct cars existing simultaneously
Same thing! God is a person; and people are beings. It doesnt make sense to me for the same reason my 3 separate cars existing simultaneously as 1 automobile, doesnt make sense to you.
Why do you keep saying I only have 1 car, when Ive told you over and over I have 3? I have 3 separate cars.
Maybe it's not everyone else who is making the mistake. It could, after all, be you ya know. Unless this is the usual 'I am right and everyone else is wrong' attitudeYes. Thats why I asked it as a side note. I just noticed everybody responding to the trinity seems to be making the exact same mistake. Just trying to see if there is a connection here.
No that would be polytheism. If you have 3 God Heads unique and distinct in roles and personality, and separate from each other yet a complete God; that would be polytheism. The only loophole that I can think of that can justify Monotheism would be if each God were a fraction of God and only when together they equal a complete God when together.If by "fraction" you mean to say every member of the God Head has a unique and distinct role, and personality separate from each other, yet each in of Himself is still fully God, then Yes.
*God is not bound to my analogies.
So how is what Im saying different than what you are saying; except my analogy includes the description of 1 automobile and yours includes the description of 1 God?All I'm doing at this point is repeating myself as you're not really responding to much of what I'm saying.
Then you cant have the Father, Son and Holy Spirit exist as one God while having the 3 God heads exist simultaneously.You cannot have a For, Chrysler, and a Chevy exist as one automobile while having the three cars exist simultaneously.
So how is it different from my claim that I have one automobile existent as a Ford, Chrysler, and a Chevy? Each car existing simultaneously and each car has the same nature and will, and each car being the same automobile?Yet according to the Trinity there is one God existent as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Each person exists simultaneously, and each person has the same nature and will. Each person is the same one God. So no, it is not for the same reason at all.
So since each emanations are a fraction of the single source of light; God, Jesus, and the HS are a fraction of God; would you agree?
No as I explained that God is a title and not a name, There is only one God. This God is represented by three separate parts. Polytheism supposes or worships multiple gods.No that would be polytheism. If you have 3 God Heads unique and distinct in roles and personality, and separate from each other yet a complete God; that would be polytheism.
And i agree so long as you incorporate the biblically based principle that all three are God in their own right.The only loophole that I can think of that can justify Monotheism would be if each God were a fraction of God and only when together they equal a complete God when together.
.Evidently this is the part that is confusing you in that we are still only governed by one government. Each separate governing body is a representation of the greater whole or a incarnation of the one Government.BTW our United States Government is closer to Polytheism than Monotheism because we are not ruled by a single ruler or ruling body like a dictator or king, we are ruled by 3 separate bodies each given distinct but equal powers
I've already explained how it is different. It is different on the basis that if you have one automobile, you cannot have three. Three cars could not exist as one as there would only be actually one vehicle.So how is what Im saying different than what you are saying; except my analogy includes the description of 1 automobile and yours includes the description of 1 God?
It's possible because first of all all three people actually exist. There is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit existing all at the same time. Second, there is one God that exists, and if each person is God then there are three people existent as the one God.Then you cant have the Father, Son and Holy Spirit exist as one God while having the 3 God heads exist simultaneously.
I've explained this numerous times now. The relevant difference is that the Ford, Chrysler, and Chevy would not all exist at the same time if indeed there was but one automobile, however, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit can all exist at the same time as one God because each person actually does exist.So how is it different from my claim that I have one automobile existent as a Ford, Chrysler, and a Chevy? Each car existing simultaneously and each car has the same nature and will, and each car being the same automobile?
I realize several people have asked for an explanation of the Trinity, but the answers given doesnt quite make sense to me and because I cant respond on those threads I have to start my own. So here is my questions:
*Is Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit the same God with 3 nicknames? if so how could one be the son and the other the father?
*Are they each a fraction of a God and only when together they are a complete God? (kinda like the "egg white, yolk, and shell" explanation I've heard before
*Or are they each 3 separate Gods? (Polytheism)
If something different please explain
Ken