EnemyOfReason
Well-Known Member
Every time I hear about NDE studies there is never any quotations nor am I able to find any sources of research just speculative neuroscience.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Every time I hear about NDE studies there is never any quotations nor am I able to find any sources of research just speculative neuroscience.
So literally, you feel that the soul is somehow "restricted by the body" and once the body dies, the soul is "free" and fully capable of experiencing the world. Got it.
So why have a body at all then? Clearly we're all better off just as souls...what's the point of having a body?
I'm having a great day, thank you lol.
So literally, you feel that the soul is somehow "restricted by the body" and once the body dies, the soul is "free" and fully capable of experiencing the world. Got it.
So why have a body at all then? Clearly we're all better off just as souls...what's the point of having a body?
I'm having a great day, thank you lol.
So why have a body at all then? Clearly we're all better off just as souls...what's the point of having a body?
Alternatively, you could just answer the questions as they are put to you.Your post is there for all to read. I'm not required to quote anything at all. I could just respond with a wall of text. I quote to bring focus to how I am interpreting you and what I am specifically responding to. If I have misunderstood you, then clarify it.
I will rephrase: why would I try to prove a negative?Because you seem to think neurology is the way to study "self". I proposed it as part of "self", so I would expect your method to address that.
By what measure do you consider yourself free of cognitive dissonance? Introspection?I'm sure you think my opinion is invalid. As it happens, I'm not undergoing any cognitive dissonance at the moment, so I think it is valid.
I do not see the similarity between the functioning of the brain and digital circuitry/software. Your analogy is lost on me.Scientific. Just as geology is not the science to explore "self", neither is neuroscience. To use the analogy I've used all through this thread, using neuroscience to explore "self" is like someone checking the CPU in their computer to figure out where the bug is in a program.
When I refer to "self" as a scientific term, I am thinking of the "phenomenal self-model" definition developed by philosophers such as Thomas Metzinger, working with neuroscientists.If any science is suited to the study of "self", it's psychology ... not that that thrills me either.
Hi, I know that you weren't responding to me, but I wanted to provide some "insight" as per the philosophy/spirituality of the discussion. This is especially concerning your latter paragraph.
God is natural; what seems like miracles to us is just "science" to Him. And, He doesn't do "magic," as in Djinn/genies/immediate wishes. Everything happens in its season - natural, yet poweful. And, as He created this universe - including the earth, when He made us, He knew that we would need an earth body. Look at the human composition: it is very close to the composition of elements and compounds found on earth. Why? Because this body is an earth body. If we were on Saturn, we would have a Saturian body. If we were in space, we would need a magnetic field to protect us from cosmic rays. Whatever physical place you are in, you need "protection."
Now, spirits inhabit bodies. The "soul" is the essence of "you" - it is (in my opinion) separate from the "spirit," which is still quasi-tangiable. So, let's use "spirit." The spirit is "free" when the body dies, because it is back in heaven. It is just a matter of consequence that the spiritual body is the appropriate "body" for heaven.
Yea, that is a "what is the meaning of life" type of question.
The end of the book of Ecclesiastes sums that question up: simplistic yet complex.
to have an experience that would not happen if you were not so restricted. why do humans like to play different video games? why do humans like to watch tv? why do humans do things the way they do things? if I want to have a human experience then I need a human body. if I want to have the experience of a different kind of being such as an angel, then I need to be whatever an angel is. if I wanna have the experience of being a dog I have to be a dog. then I can see it from different perspectives. a human with a pet dog and an angel watching it all happen from some other place, and doing what ever it is that angels do. though it would be far more complex than that since reality is far more complex.
restrictions are not necessarily bad.
i just found this on youtube. it is a person that is channeling an alien named 'bashar'... the most important part about a certain aspect of what is a spirit and soul starts at 8:26 though this youtube clip is talking about other layers of reality as well... but I think it gave a good explanation for what a human soul and spirit is.
youtube.com/watch?v=JuIJLrmDGLQ
Dunno what happened there. This was my response in the post above...
I really should post somewhere on my profile that I don't watch linked videos. Save people some time. Anyways...
You said we need a "human body" to have a "human experience". If your soul/spirit can see, smell, hear, taste, think, touch, etc...then clearly we don't need a "human body" to have a "human experience". All those human experiences are a result of those functions...which everyone seems to think the soul/spirit is capable of.
So I ask again...why the body at all? No one has given me a function that the body performs that the soul/spirit cannot
if you link a youtube video without the www. part then it does not mess up the CF forums as bad but apparently nothing can be displayed after the youtube link.
I would say that the "soul" that smells and sees things like the physical body does means that it is still in some kind of body and in some kind of reality that is like unto this human reality that i'm typing in.
just because you may "see, smell, hear, taste, think, touch, etc" does not mean the human body is not needed for a human experience. you can't mix human experience with other types of realities and then say one is not needed because it is obviously needed or wanted because it is existing.
"You can't mix human experiences with other types of realities."
So what you're saying is that the soul/spirit doesn't exist in this reality? I don't think that's what you mean. I omitted the rest because, well, those are examples of this reality as well.
the things you omitted are not to be looked at in a specific literal sense but in a more liberal symbolic sense.
the word 'reality' is a very vague term. this place we are in, what you call reality, is part of the reality of spirit. nature came from spirit. the soul is like a house for the spirit or a painting for the spirit. the physical part of the soul is the physical body. soul is the part of the spirit that 'becomes' a being. the soul is the female and the spirit is the male and they are one. the spirit shapes the soul to the degree that the soul agrees to be in union with it, or the soul can be shaped by nature or other souls as well. the soul is a garden or a wasteland, depending on what is in it, depending on what keeps it, depending on who rules over her or who her husband is. the soul is a kingdom. the soul is a world. as the higher nature of the soul becomes manifest, the spirit becomes manifest. the soul is darkness and the spirit is light. the soul is a crystallized version of spirit and the spirit is like the sea. the soul is clay and the spirit is the one who shapes the clay. you can not have one without the other. you can't have physical reality without spirit or soul because physical reality is created by spirit. nature does not contain spirit or soul, it is only part of it.
I shall throw out a few quotes from nikolai berdyaev to show you how different noxots world view might be from Ana the Ist :
Man's highest consciousness of himself is not explicable by the world of nature and remains a mystery to that world. ... Man is not only of this world but of another world; not only of necessity, but of freedom; not only out of nature, but from God....
Spirit is, as it were, the breath of God penetrating man's being and communicating a higher dignity, a higher quality of his existence, inner independence and unity....
Spiritual experience is the supreme reality in man's life: in it the divine is not proven, it is simply shown.
The reality of spirit is witnessed by the whole experience of mankind, by all its higher life. Denial of this reality is blindness and deafness to realities, the incapacity to distinguish of being, or incapacity to describe that which is distinguished. Spirit is otherwise real than the world of natural things. This reality is not proven, but evidenced by those who are capable of distinguishing qualities.
Man may know himself from above or from below, from his own light, from the divine element within him, and he may know himself from his darkness, from his elemental-subconscious, from the demonic element within himself. And he may do this because he is a dual and a contradictory being, a being polarized to the highest degree, god-like and beast-like, high and low, free and slave, capable of rising to the heights or of falling, capable of great love and sacrifice or of great cruelty and limitless egotism.
Countless times on here I've seen the term "soul" and "spirit" used almost interchangeably...and without any real explanation for what they mean. The clearest understanding I have, is that a soul is some part of you that exists apart from your physical self (as in, a supernatural part of a person).
Frankly, this sounds awful. Without eyes, ears, nerves, a tongue, a nose...and all the other rather nice physical bits of myself, I'd just be some thinking "essence" without any real sensory experience. Does this actually sound good to anyone? Would you want to exist as this? Am I way off here? If so...please correct my understanding...but before you do...consider please...
If a soul has access to all the sensory experiences we have and enjoy in our physical bodies, just what is the point of having a physical body? Wouldn't we all be better off as souls?
Just for reference, I don't believe in the soul, or spirit, but I'm curious how those who do reconcile this.
Countless times on here I've seen the term "soul" and "spirit" used almost interchangeably...and without any real explanation for what they mean. The clearest understanding I have, is that a soul is some part of you that exists apart from your physical self (as in, a supernatural part of a person).
Frankly, this sounds awful. Without eyes, ears, nerves, a tongue, a nose...and all the other rather nice physical bits of myself, I'd just be some thinking "essence" without any real sensory experience. Does this actually sound good to anyone? Would you want to exist as this? Am I way off here? If so...please correct my understanding...but before you do...consider please...
If a soul has access to all the sensory experiences we have and enjoy in our physical bodies, just what is the point of having a physical body? Wouldn't we all be better off as souls?
Just for reference, I don't believe in the soul, or spirit, but I'm curious how those who do reconcile this.