Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Somehow this blessed among women changed to blessed above all others.. Reminds me of that game where one whispers truth in someones ear and by the time it gets around all it is not even close to the first whisper..
And as noted by Jesus, her blessedness resided in her hearing & obeying God, not in the state of her flesh.
agreed; but wholeness indicates a "not competing/warring" between the inner and the outer in this life (ie, operating as a wholeness directed toward God) and likewise the whole person receiving God (as temple). In some instances, Christ healed by word and others by touch - again, evidencing "wholeness" in His example.The wholeness restored was in the relationship, not the flesh. We have the wholeness of the relationship but we must wait for return/resurrection before we put on immortality.
No, I disagree. For anyone that reads the scriptures it is plain to see.But according to the "broken telephone" idea of Mama z declared earlier .... Trinity could just be one of those concepts of God that passed on and got distorted... Not my concept it was brought up just like that... So... according to that notion any belief (norma normas???) is based on "rumor" if it is yet outside from a Biblical truth. Even reading more than the epistles during Church services should be questioned as it does not declare so in the Bible...or one marrying its own offsprings.!!! etc. ....
Again in the Bible it does not so specify that the Bible is the ONLY authority in Christian belief... period!!
You know what, folks, after I became a Christian the word, trinity, carried no special meaning for me. I did not need a church to drum it into me. When I read the New Testament for the first time it was quite apparent that God was the Father of Jesus Christ, Jesus Christ was God, and the Holy Spirit was God. It was also clearly evident that there is only one God. In my feeble little mind it dawned on me that these three are one God. A trinity by any other name is still a trinity.
You brought it up in response to MamaZ's post.Still the word Trinity nowhere to be found ... Anyways that is not our topic and I would hate to derail that was brought up as an analogy and there are some more that would align in the same manner...
Not to simply be contentious, but this (bolded & italicized) is in contradiction to the assertions I hear in defense of extra-scriptural Traditions that illiteracy was the norm.I have no doubt that this happens (you're evidence, for one); but it would seem in earlier times, a different mileau, this would not necessarily be the case. For example, such an idea could easily be "confused" with existent notions of "trinity" (Platonic, Celtic, for ex.) and take on the characteristics of pagan trinities. Also, the idea of the identity of the promised Messiah then popular in some circles presented another competing conceptualization.
Though I may be wrong, I do think modern Christians have benefited from the battles waged on this issue in earlier centuries.
Eggs Ackley the same here.quote=bbbbbbb; You know what, folks, after I became a Christian the word, trinity, carried no special meaning for me. I did not need a church to drum it into me. When I read the New Testament for the first time it was quite apparent that God was the Father of Jesus Christ, Jesus Christ was God, and the Holy Spirit was God. It was also clearly evident that there is only one God. In my feeble little mind it dawned on me that these three are one God.
Dude, you could write plays or somethin'!A trinity by any other name is still a trinity.
That mini-rant was inspired by my assertion that any oral tradition mentioned in scripture isn't necessarily any different than what's written, but is necessarily in harmony with what's written.