Evolution didn't happen! It's all lies I tell you! Walt Disney made the stuff up in his lab
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Can you prove it didn't happen?steelerguy99 said:Evolution didn't happen! It's all lies I tell you! Walt Disney made the stuff up in his lab
Go for it. Show us your evidence ( and quoting Genesis 1 doesn't count).steelerguy99 said:Yeah I can.![]()
Jase said:Go for it. Show us your evidence ( and quoting Genesis 1 doesn't count).
In other words, you don't have evidence or you're a parody. Got it.steelerguy99 said:You have to buy my book.![]()
Jase said:In other words, you don't have evidence or you're a parody. Got it.
MartinM said:No, he isn't. The brother said that mutations don't change gene number, which is false. Duplications do, for instance.
RichardT said:Yes it does.
Read Genesis 1....
Christians that accept evolution are "liberal" christians... There's nothing worse than being a liberal..
RichardT said:Yes it does.
Read Genesis 1....
Christians that accept evolution are "liberal" christians... There's nothing worse than being a liberal..
Except maybe being a close minded fundamentalist.RichardT said:Yes it does.
Read Genesis 1....
Christians that accept evolution are "liberal" christians... There's nothing worse than being a liberal..
I wish the word fundamentalist wasn't such a dirty word. It SHOULD mean :Follows the fundamentals. what it as become is Intolerant, bigoted, stone thowing, terroristic, etc...Jase said:Except maybe being a close minded fundamentalist.
Please show me where in Genesis 1 it says evolution cannot be true.
Uphill Battle said:I wish the word fundamentalist wasn't such a dirty word. It SHOULD mean :Follows the fundamentals. what it as become is Intolerant, bigoted, stone thowing, terroristic, etc...
But that's a matter for another thread.
random_guy said:I agree. I think part of the problem with the debates today is how people frame the issue. Look at how RichardT uses liberal as a deflamatory remark, even though liberalism as brought some of our greatest freedoms. Likewise, I live in Utah, and I know people that call themselves fundamentalists, but are not intolerant, bigotted, etc... Anyway, back on topic.
RichardT:
What are your thoughts about Christian geologists who falsified the Global Flood searching for evidence of the Flood, and that with new advances in science, 99% of geologists now accept that the Earth is old?
He's not saying that the Earth is old because 99% of geologists believe it is. He's saying that the evidence for an old Earth convinces 99% of geologists.Uphill Battle said:Thanks for replying. As to your 2nd part, isn't quoting "Majority rules" technically an error in logic?
Uphill Battle said:Hey random.
Thanks for replying. As to your 2nd part, isn't quoting "Majority rules" technically an error in logic?
at one point, the scientific consensus was that the earth was flat. (insomuch as it was archaic "science.") There is always the possibility that the majority, even if experts, are wrong.Skaloop said:Not so much when dealing with experts in the given field (geology). In this case, it is scientific consensus, not argumentum ad populum.
Contrary to popular belief, the idea of a flat earth was disbanded very early in history. In the 1st century BC at the latest, every scholar agreed that the earth is spherical - and you can't really say that there was something like the "scientific consensus"before that time.Uphill Battle said:at one point, the scientific consensus was that the earth was flat. (insomuch as it was archaic "science.") There is always the possibility that the majority, even if experts, are wrong.