There is evidence for a flood. But I don't see the point in bringing much of it up. I've had these conversations before. The issue is we don't know enough about what the earth was really like back then. Not at all. We don't know what the atmosphere was like, what the land was like. How much land vs water there was. Here's something to chew on. We know very little about what's at the bottom of our oceans.
Anyway, this is all I am going to post on this subject anymore.
Evidence Noah's Biblical Flood Happened, Says Robert Ballard
A recently discovered fossilized forest in Antarctica could be evidence of the Bible's great flood
We have fish on Mount Everest. We have evidence of a great flood in China. There is geological evidence beneath the Earth's surface is Russia. There was a vast lake in Canada that the water suddenly fled out of.
I mean there are all kinds of things like this all over the earth. Those that don't believe in the flood just dismiss it with other explanations. Explanations by the way that they just don't know. And that's my point we just don't know everything. To say we do is beyond ludicrous.
As we know science is not exact and is learning all the time. Who knows what might be discovered in the next 200 years or so.
So there's no point in continuing this conversation.
Fundamentalist Christian beliefs thrive among the
uneducated.
There is evidence for a flood. But I don't see the point in bringing much of it up. I've had these conversations before. The issue is we don't know enough about what the earth was really like back then. Not at all. We don't know what the atmosphere was like, what the land was like. How much land vs water there was. Here's something to chew on. We know very little about what's at the bottom of our oceans.
Anyway, this is all I am going to post on this subject anymore.
Evidence Noah's Biblical Flood Happened, Says Robert Ballard
A recently discovered fossilized forest in Antarctica could be evidence of the Bible's great flood
We have fish on Mount Everest. We have evidence of a great flood in China. There is geological evidence beneath the Earth's surface is Russia. There was a vast lake in Canada that the water suddenly fled out of.
I mean there are all kinds of things like this all over the earth. Those that don't believe in the flood just dismiss it with other explanations. Explanations by the way that they just don't know. And that's my point we just don't know everything. To say we do is beyond ludicrous.
As we know science is not exact and is learning all the time. Who knows what might be discovered in the next 200 years or so.
So there's no point in continuing this conversation.
A point for you is whether it is wise to accuse the God
you nominally worship of committing such a vast atrocity as
described in genesis.
Sure, there is "evidence," such as you speak of.
God, it may be presumed, equipped people with brains, and expects
people to be responsible, and use them.
The evidence you speak of is on the level of the " evidence"
exclaimed over when I was at Uni in NYC, walking across
campus with another girl one autumn day.
A fine red maple leaf fell at our feet. "Look", she says, "It's a
Sign from God, to represent the Trinity!"
"So why does it have five parts?" I asked.
" Oh, you are right. It represents the Pentarch!".
Thing about evidence is it varies in quality and needs
interpretation in it's context. Use of some brains.
Sure, you can find seashells in Kansas. Quick glance, oh, it's a
Sign of the flood. Careful study of the geology
shows how impossible that is.
Someone can find an empty whiskey bottle and conclude
it is evidence that your drunk driving resulted in criminal
manslaughter. The theory is advanced that you did it!
You re on trial!
More evidence comes in!
But if investigation shows that A) said bottle was left in the car to
frame you but more importantly that C) you were having high tea.
with Queen E at the time, the theory of your guilt is disproved.
That is how science works. Meticulous investigation,
and, if there is data contrary to the theory or.hypothesis
then they are disproved and abandoned.
Polar ice alone disproves any and all the so- called
flood evidence.
Anyone claiming to be a scholar in any field.
ought to know how that works. It's not just
science that values meticulous study and
the understanding that data contrary to n
idea diproves it, no matter how precious it is.
The fundamentalist mindset is the opposite of
scholarship and intellectual integrity.
To illustrate, we present Dr. k Wise, PhD paleontology:
" ...even if all the evidence in the universe turns against
Yec, I will still be yec as that is why the bie seems to
indicate.".
Dr W. is no scholar nor is it possible to be n intellectually
dishonest scholar.
