• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

PeanutGallery part 2. Isaiah 53 response to "Why don't our Jewish brothers see ...."

Truthfrees

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 20, 2015
13,793
2,912
✟299,688.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Good advice. Thank you.
 
Upvote 0

Hoshiyya

Spenglerian
Mar 5, 2013
5,285
1,023
✟39,686.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
. . .

1. What's an example of something Jews have split over?

2. Have they split with MJ's over any Halacha?

Shalom Truthfrees, hope all is well with you.

1. What's an example of something Jews have split over?

In ancient times, the Sadducees and Pharisees were in disunity regarding (among other issues) the timing of the Shavuot (Pentecost).
In modern times, the Chasidim and the other Orthodox are split organizationally, but have much agreement when compared with the Karaite, who also disagree on the timing of the Shavuot.
There are certain Jews that count days from sunrise to sunrise, instead of the traditional method of counting (sunset to sunset, from the time three stars are visble as three witnesses in the sky) and thereby prohibit themselves from having unity with those keeping the traditional method of counting.
In these examples, timing is the issue, which is a practical matter, not an issue of "free will versus predestination" or "transubstantiation versus consubstantiation" or other such purely doctrinal matters.
Another good example are the Reform Jews: if they disagreed with the Orthodox only on matters of theory, they'd still be Orthodox. But their liberal, pick-and-choose attitude toward Torah make true unity between them and the Orthodox impossible.




2. Have they split with MJ's over any Halacha?


Interesting question.

Let's say you have two Jews, who both follow the same halaka and keep the Torah the same way. One of them believes the Messiah is Menachem Mendel Schneerson, or that he hasn't come yet, the other Jew believes Yeshua (Jesus of Nazareth) is the Messiah.

Now let's say you have two Jews, both of which agree that the Messiah is Schneerson or that he has not come yet, but who disagree on practical halakic matters.

Which pair will have more unity?

It makes sense that the first pair, which agree on lifestyle, would have more unity than the pair who disagree on lifestyle.
It seems to me that this is the hope or expectation of Paul and the Apostles in general, that the gentiles who accept Yeshua would themselves be accepted as Torah-keepers by the Jews.
Of course, they'd have to actually keep or try to keep Torah for that to happen.

Another possibility is that Paul and the Apostles expected the Jews who accept Yeshua and Torah would, along with the gentiles who accept the same, to organize together according to the same way the other Jews were organized, in the event that they were not accepted into the fold by these other Jews.
Hence MJ's should not be organized like a typical church, but rather have the same structure and method (and attitude) as the Orthodox Jews - even if they do not have organizational unity with the Orthodox Jews.
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟105,748.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Shalom Truthfrees, hope all is well with you
1. What's an example of something Jews have split over?

The second coming of Christ is highly debated by those who oppose the literal return of Christ.
2Co 12:21 And lest, when I come again, my God will humble me among you, and that I shall bewail many which have sinned already, and have not repented of the uncleanness and fornication and lasciviousness which they have committed.

Act 1:6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
 
Upvote 0

yonah_mishael

הֱיֵה קודם כל בן אדם
Jun 14, 2009
5,370
1,325
Tel Aviv, Israel
Visit site
✟34,673.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat

2 Cor 12.21 was talking about Paul going back to Corinth. It has nothing to do with Jesus coming back to earth. What in the world??
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
31,003
5,830
✟1,013,526.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married

The first quote, being taken from a letter of St. Paul to the Church at Corinth is out of context.

Acts 1:6 does show that Jesus Christ did not fit the "expectations" of many Jews. More appropriate quotes to support this would be found in Matthew 24:27 New King James Version: 27 For as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be.; Acts 10:42 42 And He commanded us to preach to the people, and to testify that it is He who was ordained by God to be Judge of the living and the dead. and 2 Timothy, the whole of Chapter 4; particularly in verse one; 1 I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom:.



 
Upvote 0

Truthfrees

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 20, 2015
13,793
2,912
✟299,688.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
2 Cor 12.21 was talking about Paul going back to Corinth. It has nothing to do with Jesus coming back to earth. What in the world??


I agree with you both.
 
Upvote 0

Torah Lishmah

The study of Torah for its own sake
Mar 17, 2013
438
50
✟24,056.00
Country
United States
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Are you saying because I like someone's explanation I am guilty of the same accusation you give to them?
Absolutely not! I know you are not anti-Semetic, and I didn't even hint at that. But accusing me of that was a pretty good way to avoid the real substance of my post.

Here is the comment you said was perfect, and you couldn't have said it any better...

To which I replied...

So I'll ask you again to substantiate your claims, please. It is the Jewish people who are a light unto the gentiles by bringing forth, and upholding the Torah (observing the mitzvot). When has the Church ever been Torah observant? When has the Church ever promoted Torah observance? Doesn't the Church do the exact opposite, and claim that Torah Law ended when Yeshua was crucified? Not only that, but do they not claim one of the main reasons he was crucified was to free people from Torah Law, which they view as a curse?


 
Upvote 0

Tishri1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2004
59,894
4,321
Southern California
✟347,174.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married

Im not playing your game TL this was my post....don't put words in my mouth or intention in my heart

My point, IMO( in my opinion) Paul was Torah observant and taught gentiles to be....it was suppose to be the Jews job to introduce God to the pagan nations and disciple them....they don't appear to be doing that like the gentiles are.. From what I know they only evangelize their own blood and those who really already want to convert ( from what I have heard, not saying its fact)

Can the Christian loose sight of this great commission too..sure absolutely!

Hey Im not about telling you how to evangelize though, thats your business....What I am all about though is believing Paul was not teaching gentiles to give up Torah ....His focus was hey if the power of the Holy Spirit was all over these folks , and we can see that with our own eyes..then they are saved, no more hoops to jump thru first....lets get them educated AS they walk it out with us.....
 
Upvote 0

Truthfrees

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 20, 2015
13,793
2,912
✟299,688.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Hellenization of scriptures does make it look as though the Paul is saying this.

But Paul also said there always is and will be a faithful Israel. (Romans 9:27, 11:5)

IMO, the scriptures quoted are talking about hypocrites, those who knew Yeshua was Messiah, and yet rejected him, not the Jewish people as a whole.

"Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: “Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, The remnant will be saved." - Romans 9:27

"Even so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace." - Romans 11:5

I believe Hellenization of scriptures includes a strong bias for replacement theology.

The state of "hypocrisy" or "falling away" can be applied to Gentiles as well as Jews, because both groups have the faithful and the unfaithful.

IMO, faithfulness to YHVH is something we all need to focus on.
 
Upvote 0

yonah_mishael

הֱיֵה קודם כל בן אדם
Jun 14, 2009
5,370
1,325
Tel Aviv, Israel
Visit site
✟34,673.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
By the way, I've finished writing up my explanation for Truthfrees's questions. If you're interested, contact me by PM and I'll send you the link. It's published online as a PDF.

By the way, it's a 17-page presentation of my opinion as to why Jews do not believe in Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
31,003
5,830
✟1,013,526.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Anywhere we have interaction, don't you think?

If you are free to say everything you want to on this forum then, yes.

Dear friends,

I have no issues with allowing such a dialogue in Formal Debate. This is a good topic for discussion, and in formal debate it would be just the two of you.

Propose the topic here: Formal Debate Proposals

We can work out the stipulations and set this up for you guys. I'm also flexible with the stipulations so like the discussions between Athanasius and Myself we can leave it open ended with no maximum number of posts limit. Formal debate is a report free zone so you both may speak freely but with civility.

What do you guys think?

Mark
Area Supervisor


 
Upvote 0

Truthfrees

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 20, 2015
13,793
2,912
✟299,688.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Hi Mark,
I was thinking more of dialogue rather than debate.

IOW, asking questions of the Jewish perspective for clarification, and then presenting scripture for consideration, etc.

I've been learning a lot of new things from the Jewish perspective, and am interested in first understanding the other side, and then reasoning together.

"Come now, and let us reason together, says the Lord." - Isaiah 1:18

Have you read Yonah's 17 page presentation on why Jews don't believe in Yeshua?

I was hoping for a dialogue on that topic, so anyone could present scripture in a friendly fashion.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
31,003
5,830
✟1,013,526.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married

A dialogue is exactly what I thought you had in mind!

I mentioned above the "dialogue" that I had set up for Athanasius (a Catholic) and myself (a Lutheran) to discuss the Augsburg Confession; the document that 500 years ago caused separation of our two Churches. I envisioned a similar "go and see; ask and learn" type thread to develop understanding. I was not thinking of an adversarial-debate type thread at all.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
31,003
5,830
✟1,013,526.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married


Anywhere we have interaction, don't you think?

Yonah, would you be interested in helping us out and giving this a try? Formal Debate's moderated threads would ensure that you both can speak freely and openly without the intrusion of others.

Let's break some new ground here at CF!
 
Upvote 0

Truthfrees

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 20, 2015
13,793
2,912
✟299,688.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
I liked this from page 3 of Yonah's 18pg paper on Hebrewcafe.

There's more that I liked, but this was the first thing.

There's a lot in Yonah's paper that would be excellent for a discussion.
 
Upvote 0